Major Update: Remdesivir for Adults With COVID-19 : A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians Practice Points

Anjum S Kaka, Roderick MacDonald, Nancy Greer, Kathryn Vela, Wei Duan-Porter, Adam Obley, Timothy J Wilt, Anjum S Kaka, Roderick MacDonald, Nancy Greer, Kathryn Vela, Wei Duan-Porter, Adam Obley, Timothy J Wilt

Abstract

Background: Remdesivir is being studied and used for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Purpose: To update a previous review of remdesivir for adults with COVID-19, including new meta-analyses of patients with COVID-19 of any severity compared with control.

Data sources: Several sources from 1 January 2020 through 7 December 2020.

Study selection: English-language, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of remdesivir for COVID-19. New evidence is incorporated by using living review methods.

Data extraction: 1 reviewer abstracted data; a second reviewer verified the data. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method were used.

Data synthesis: The update includes 5 RCTs, incorporating data from a new large RCT and the final results of a previous RCT. Compared with control, a 10-day course of remdesivir probably results in little to no reduction in mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.06]; 4 RCTs) but may result in a small reduction in the proportion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.71 [CI, 0.56 to 0.90]; 3 RCTs). Remdesivir probably results in a moderate increase in the percentage of patients who recovered and a moderate decrease in serious adverse events and may result in a large reduction in time to recovery. Effect on hospital length of stay or percentage remaining hospitalized is mixed. Compared with a 10-day course for those not requiring ventilation at baseline, a 5-day course may reduce mortality, the need for ventilation, and serious adverse events while increasing the percentage of patients who recovered or clinically improved.

Limitation: Summarizing findings was challenging because of varying disease severity definitions and outcomes.

Conclusion: In hospitalized adults with COVID-19, remdesivir probably results in little to no mortality difference but probably improves the percentage recovered and reduces serious harms and may result in a small reduction in the proportion receiving ventilation. For patients not receiving ventilation, a 5-day course may provide greater benefits and fewer harms with lower drug costs than a 10-day course.

Primary funding source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M20-8148.

Figures

Appendix Figure.. Evidence search and selection.
Appendix Figure.. Evidence search and selection.
Figure 1.. Mortality for remdesivir 10-d course…
Figure 1.. Mortality for remdesivir 10-d course vs.
control (placebo or standard care). The black diamonds reflect pooled results from randomized controlled trials (listed above) that enrolled patients in the corresponding respiratory support subgroups. ACTT-1 = Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; RR = risk ratio; SIMPLE-2 = Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir [GS-5734] in Participants With Moderate Coronavirus Disease [COVID-19] Compared to Standard of Care Treatment. Top. Overall. Bottom. Results by initial respiratory status.
Figure 2.. Nonmortality outcomes for remdesivir 10-d…
Figure 2.. Nonmortality outcomes for remdesivir 10-d course vs.
control (placebo or standard care). ACTT-1 = Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; RR = risk ratio; SIMPLE-2 = Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Remdesivir [GS-5734] in Participants With Moderate Coronavirus Disease [COVID-19] Compared to Standard of Care Treatment. Top. Proportion of patients recovered. Middle. Need for invasive ventilation/ECMO. Bottom. Patients with ≥1 serious adverse event. * For the pooled trials, defined as proportion receiving invasive ventilation/ECMO (new vs. continued from baseline) at follow-up (ACTT-1 on day 15, Wang et al on day 14, and SIMPLE-2 on day 11). † Unpooled Solidarity trial, defined as subsequent need for ventilation in those not receiving ventilation at baseline (through day 28).

References

    1. Mulangu S , Dodd LE , Davey RT Jr , et al; PALM Writing Group. A randomized, controlled trial of Ebola virus disease therapeutics. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2293-303. [PMID: ] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910993
    1. Sheahan TP , Sims AC , Leist SR , et al. Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2020;11:222. [PMID: ] doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13940-6
    1. Wilt TJ , Kaka AS , MacDonald R , et al. Remdesivir for adults with COVID-19: a living systematic review for an American College of Physicians Practice Points. Ann Intern Med. 2020. doi:10.7326/M20-5752
    1. Pan H , Peto R , Henao-Restrepo AM , et al; WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. Repurposed antiviral drugs for Covid-19—interim WHO Solidarity trial results. N Engl J Med. 2020. [PMID: ] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2023184
    1. Beigel JH , Tomashek KM , Dodd LE , et al; ACTT-1 Study Group Members. Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19—final report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1813-1826. [PMID: ] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Accessed at on 24 July 2020.
    1. Schunemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, et al, eds. GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. Accessed at on 2 June 2020.
    1. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;36:1-48.
    1. Higgins JP , Thompson SG , Deeks JJ , et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-60. [PMID: ]
    1. Wilt TJ, Kaka AS, MacDonald R, et al. Rapid Response: COVID-19: Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults. Evidence Synthesis Program, Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2020. VA ESP Project 09-009.
    1. Goldman JD , Lye DCB , Hui DS , et al; GS-US-540-5773 Investigators. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 days in patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1827-37. [PMID: ] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2015301
    1. Spinner CD , Gottlieb RL , Criner GJ , et al; GS-US-540-5774 Investigators. Effect of remdesivir vs standard care on clinical status at 11 days in patients with moderate COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324:1048-57. [PMID: ] doi:10.1001/jama.2020.16349
    1. Wang Y , Zhang D , Du G , et al. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1569-78. [PMID: ] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9
    1. Horby P , Lim WS , Emberson JR , et al; RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19—preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020. [PMID: ] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first treatment for COVID-19. Accessed at on 3 November 2020.
    1. Harrington DP , Baden LR , Hogan JW . A large, simple trial leading to complex questions [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2020. [PMID: ] doi:10.1056/NEJMe2034294
    1. Hsu J . Covid-19: what now for remdesivir. BMJ. 2020;371:m4457. [PMID: ] doi:10.1136/bmj.m4457
    1. McCreary EK , Angus DC . Efficacy of remdesivir in COVID-19 [Editorial]. JAMA. 2020;324:1041-2. [PMID: ] doi:10.1001/jama.2020.16337
    1. Siemieniuk R , Rochwerg B , Agoritsas T , et al. A living WHO guideline on drugs for Covid-19. BMJ. 2020;370:m3379. [PMID: ] doi:10.1136/bmj.m3379
    1. Bhimraj A, Morgan RL, Shumaker AH, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19. Accessed at on 21 December 2020.
    1. National Institutes of Health. Therapeutic management of patients with COVID-19. Accessed at on 21 December 2020.
    1. Abraham GM, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Jokela JA, et al. Should remdesivir be used for the treatment of patients with COVID-19? Rapid, living practice points from the American College of Physicians (version 2). Ann Intern Med. 9 February 2020. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.7326/M20-8101
    1. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. ICER provides second update to pricing models for remdesivir as a treatment for COVID-19. Accessed at on 8 December 2020.
    1. Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir (GS-5734™) Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in an Outpatient Setting [clinical trial]. Accessed at on 21 December 2020.
    1. Study in Participants With Early Stage Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Remdesivir Administered by Inhalation [clinical trial]. Accessed at on 21 December 2020.
    1. Gilead Sciences. Gilead's response to COVID-19. Accessed at on 21 December 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren