Mental health in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic: protocol for a nationally representative multilevel survey in Serbia

Nadja P Marić, Ljiljana B Lazarević, Ljiljana Mihić, Milica Pejovic Milovancevic, Zorica Terzić, Oliver Tošković, Jovana Todorović, Olivera Vuković, Goran Knezevic, Nadja P Marić, Ljiljana B Lazarević, Ljiljana Mihić, Milica Pejovic Milovancevic, Zorica Terzić, Oliver Tošković, Jovana Todorović, Olivera Vuković, Goran Knezevic

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to have a prolonged impact on mental health (MH); however, the long-term MH effects of the COVID-19 pandemic remain unknown. The Serbian national survey-CoV2Soul.RS-was launched to document the MH status of the Serbian population following the COVID-19 pandemic and to contribute to an international evidence base about MH prevalence rates during different phases of the pandemic.

Methods and analysis: This cross-sectional study was designed to collect a nationally representative sample (N=1200; age 18-65 years; estimated start/end-June/November 2021) using multistage probabilistic household sampling. Trained staff will conduct in-person diagnostic interviews. A battery of self-report instruments will be administered to assess the quality of life (QoL), general distress and associated protective and harmful psychological and societal factors. Analyses will be conducted to delineate the prevalence rates of MH disorders, how MH conditions and QoL vary with respect to sociodemographic variables, personality, health status and traumatic events during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to test how these relations depend on geographical region. Moreover, this study was designed to explore mechanisms linking personality and the perception of pandemic consequences and associated distress. Prevalence rates of MH disorders will be calculated using descriptive statistics. For additional analyses, we will use correlations, analysis of variance and regression analyses. The hierarchical structure of the data will be explored using multilevel random coefficient modelling. Structural equation modelling will be used to investigate the indirect effects of personality on distress through relevant variables.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical Committees of the Faculty of Medicine (1322-VII/31) and Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade (02-33/273) and Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad (05-27, br.893/1) approved the protocol. Only respondents able to provide informed consent will participate in the study. Research reports will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and the results will be placed on the website www.cov2soul.rs to be available to funders, researchers, policy-makers and interested laypeople, and will be advertised through social media.

Trial registration number: NCT04896983.

Keywords: COVID-19; epidemiology; mental health; psychiatry.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Holmes EA, O'Connor RC, Perry VH, et al. . Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:547–60. 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
    1. Mak IWC, Chu CM, Pan PC, et al. . Long-Term psychiatric morbidities among SARS survivors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2009;31:318–26. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.001
    1. Lecic-Tosevski D, Vukovic O, Maric PB. The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018: 90–114.
    1. van Agteren J, Bartholomaeus J, Fassnacht DB, et al. . Using Internet-based psychological measurement to capture the deteriorating community mental health profile during COVID-19: observational study. JMIR Ment Health 2020;7:e20696. 10.2196/20696
    1. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. . The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020;395:912–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
    1. Galletly C. Psychiatry in the COVID-19 era. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2020;54:447–8. 10.1177/0004867420920359
    1. Winkler P, Formanek T, Mlada K, et al. . Increase in prevalence of current mental disorders in the context of COVID-19: analysis of repeated nationwide cross-sectional surveys. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2020;29:e173. 10.1017/S2045796020000888
    1. Pierce M, Hope H, Ford T, et al. . Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:883–92. 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4
    1. McCracken LM, Badinlou F, Buhrman M, et al. . Psychological impact of COVID-19 in the Swedish population: depression, anxiety, and insomnia and their associations to risk and vulnerability factors. Eur Psychiatry 2020;63:e81. 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.81
    1. Fiorillo A, Sampogna G, Giallonardo V, et al. . Effects of the lockdown on the mental health of the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: results from the comet collaborative network. Eur Psychiatry 2020;63:e87. 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.89
    1. Patten SB, Kutcher S, Streiner D. Population mental health and COVID-19: why do we know so little? Can J Psychiatry 2021;19:7067437211010523. 10.1177/07067437211010523
    1. Nezlek JB. Multilevel random coefficient analyses of Event- and Interval-Contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2001;27:771–85. 10.1177/0146167201277001
    1. Stewart DE, Appelbaum PS. COVID-19 and psychiatrists' responsibilities: a WPA position paper. World Psychiatry 2020;19:406. 10.1002/wps.20803
    1. Fiorillo A, Gorwood P. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. Eur Psychiatry 2020;63:e32. 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.35
    1. Scherbaum CA, Ferreter JM. Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organ Res Methods 2009;12:347–67. 10.1177/1094428107308906
    1. Hox J. Multilevel modeling: When and why. In: Classification, data analysis, and data highways. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1998: 147–54.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:1149–60. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. . The Mini-International neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59 Suppl 20:22–33.
    1. Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, et al. . Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol 1994;49:15–24. 10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15
    1. Park HY, Park WB, Lee SH, et al. . Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression of survivors 12 months after the outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome in South Korea. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1–9. 10.1186/s12889-020-08726-1
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    1. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, et al. . Application and results of the Manchester short assessment of quality of life (Mansa). Int J Soc Psychiatry 1999;45:7–12. 10.1177/002076409904500102
    1. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
    1. Brugha T, Bebbington P, Tennant C, et al. . The list of threatening experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychol Med 1985;15:189–94. 10.1017/S003329170002105X
    1. Taylor S, Landry CA, Paluszek MM, et al. . Development and initial validation of the COVID stress scales. J Anxiety Disord 2020;72:102232. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232
    1. Ashton MC, Lee K. The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. J Pers Assess 2009;91:340–5. 10.1080/00223890902935878
    1. Knezevic G, Savic D, Kutlesic V, et al. . Disintegration: a reconceptualization of psychosis proneness as a personality trait separate from the big five. J Res Pers 2017;70:187–201. 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.06.001
    1. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, et al. . A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging 2004;26:655–72. 10.1177/0164027504268574
    1. Bieber F, Prelec T, Jovic D. The suspicious virus: Conspiracies and COVID19 in the Balkans. BiEPAG, 2021.
    1. Mulukom van, Pummerer LJ, Alper S. Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: a rapid review of the evidence. Available:
    1. Gavrilovic D. Statistical yearbook, 2019. Available:
    1. Lazarević LB, Bjekić J, Živanović M, et al. . Ambulatory assessment of language use: evidence on the temporal stability of electronically activated recorder and stream of consciousness data. Behav Res Methods 2020;52:1817–35. 10.3758/s13428-020-01361-z
    1. Priebe S, Bogic M, Ajdukovic D, et al. . Mental disorders following war in the Balkans: a study in 5 countries. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67:518–28. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.37
    1. Hampshire A, Trender W, Chamberlain S. Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 relative to controls: an N= 84,285 online study. MedRxiv 2020.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren