Safety and immunogenicity of 2-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccination in healthy and HIV-infected adults: A randomised, placebo-controlled Phase II clinical trial in Africa

Houreratou Barry, Gaudensia Mutua, Hannah Kibuuka, Zacchaeus Anywaine, Sodiomon B Sirima, Nicolas Meda, Omu Anzala, Serge Eholie, Christine Bétard, Laura Richert, Christine Lacabaratz, M Juliana McElrath, Stephen De Rosa, Kristen W Cohen, Georgi Shukarev, Cynthia Robinson, Auguste Gaddah, Dirk Heerwegh, Viki Bockstal, Kerstin Luhn, Maarten Leyssen, Macaya Douoguih, Rodolphe Thiébaut, EBL2002 Study group, Houreratou Barry, Gaudensia Mutua, Hannah Kibuuka, Zacchaeus Anywaine, Sodiomon B Sirima, Nicolas Meda, Omu Anzala, Serge Eholie, Christine Bétard, Laura Richert, Christine Lacabaratz, M Juliana McElrath, Stephen De Rosa, Kristen W Cohen, Georgi Shukarev, Cynthia Robinson, Auguste Gaddah, Dirk Heerwegh, Viki Bockstal, Kerstin Luhn, Maarten Leyssen, Macaya Douoguih, Rodolphe Thiébaut, EBL2002 Study group

Abstract

Background: We investigated safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the heterologous 2-dose Ebola vaccination regimen in healthy and HIV-infected adults with different intervals between Ebola vaccinations.

Methods and findings: In this randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II trial, 668 healthy 18- to 70-year-olds and 142 HIV-infected 18- to 50-year-olds were enrolled from 1 site in Kenya and 2 sites each in Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, and Uganda. Participants received intramuscular Ad26.ZEBOV followed by MVA-BN-Filo at 28-, 56-, or 84-day intervals, or saline. Females represented 31.4% of the healthy adult cohort in contrast to 69.7% of the HIV-infected cohort. A subset of healthy adults received booster vaccination with Ad26.ZEBOV or saline at Day 365. Following vaccinations, adverse events (AEs) were collected until 42 days post last vaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded from signing of the ICF until the end of the study. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoint was immunogenicity. Anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein (EBOV GP) binding and neutralising antibodies were measured at baseline and at predefined time points throughout the study. The first participant was enrolled on 9 November 2015, and the date of last participant's last visit was 12 February 2019. No vaccine-related SAEs and mainly mild-to-moderate AEs were observed among the participants. The most frequent solicited AEs were injection-site pain (local), and fatigue, headache, and myalgia (systemic), respectively. Twenty-one days post-MVA-BN-Filo vaccination, geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of EBOV GP binding antibodies in healthy adults in 28-, 56-, and 84-day interval groups were 3,085 EU/mL (2,648 to 3,594), 7,518 EU/mL (6,468 to 8,740), and 7,300 EU/mL (5,116 to 10,417), respectively. In HIV-infected adults in 28- and 56-day interval groups, GMCs were 4,207 EU/mL (3,233 to 5,474) and 5,283 EU/mL (4,094 to 6,817), respectively. Antibody responses were observed until Day 365. Ad26.ZEBOV booster vaccination after 1 year induced an anamnestic response. Study limitations include that some healthy adult participants either did not receive dose 2 or received dose 2 outside of their protocol-defined interval and that the follow-up period was limited to 365 days for most participants.

Conclusions: Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination was well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy and HIV-infected African adults. Increasing the interval between vaccinations from 28 to 56 days improved the magnitude of humoral immune responses. Antibody levels persisted to at least 1 year, and Ad26.ZEBOV booster vaccination demonstrated the presence of vaccination-induced immune memory. These data supported the approval by the European Union for prophylaxis against EBOV disease in adults and children ≥1 year of age.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02564523.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: HB, CB, LR reports grants from IMI2-2 [Grant Agreement EBOVAC2 (No.115861) from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking which receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme], during the conduct of the study. SBS reports grants from Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, during the conduct of the study. GS, CR, AG, DH, VB, KL, ML and MD were full-time employees of Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study, and declared ownership of shares in Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig 1. Study disposition of healthy adults…
Fig 1. Study disposition of healthy adults and HIV-infected adults.
n = number of participants.
Fig 2. Anti-EBOV GP binding antibody responses.
Fig 2. Anti-EBOV GP binding antibody responses.
(A) Healthy adults administered Ad26.ZEBOV on Day 1 and MVA-BN-Filo 28, 56, or 84 days later as indicated. Subsets of 28- and 56-day groups received Ad26.ZEBOV booster on Day 365. “Pre-booster” indicates the pre-booster vaccination measurement observed in participants who received the booster vaccination. (B) HIV-infected adults administered with Ad26.ZEBOV on Day 1 and MVA-BN-Filo 28 or 56 days later, as indicated. Responses are expressed as GMCs (ELISA units/mL, 95% CI). Responses in placebo groups are shown as open symbols. Black dotted line represents the LLOQ. The points (symbols) denote GMCs, and error bars denote 95% CIs. Vaccines: Ad26 = Ad26.ZEBOV at a dose of 5 × 1010 vp; MVA = MVA-BN-Filo at a dose of 1 × 108 Inf.U. CI, confidence interval; GMC, geometric mean concentration; LLOQ, lower limit of quantification.
Fig 3. Anti-EBOV GP neutralising antibody responses…
Fig 3. Anti-EBOV GP neutralising antibody responses in healthy adults.
The error bars represent the GMT (IC50) and its 95% CI. Subset of healthy adults administered with Ad26.ZEBOV on Day 1 and MVA-BN-Filo 28 or 56 days later as indicated. Responses in placebo groups are shown as open symbols. Black dotted line represents the LLOQ. Vaccines: Ad26 = Ad26.ZEBOV at a dose of 5 × 1010 vp; MVA = MVA-BN-Filo at a dose of 1 × 108 Inf.U. CI, confidence interval; GMT, geometric mean titre; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; LLOQ, lower limit of quantification.

References

    1. Piot P, Spencer J. From 1976 to 2018: reflections on early investigations into the Ebola virus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112:527–8. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try088
    1. Malvy D, McElroy AK, de Clerck H, Günther S, van Griensven J. Ebola virus disease. Lancet. 2019;393:936–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33132-5
    1. World Health Organization. Situation Report: Ebola Virus Disease 10 June 2016. Available from: .
    1. Ebola Outbreak Epidemiology Team. Outbreak of Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, April-May, 2018: an epidemiological study. Lancet. 2018;392:213–21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31387-4
    1. World Health Organization. 10th Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared over; vigilance against flare-ups and support for survivors must continue. [cited 2021 Sept 1]. Available from: .
    1. Lévy Y, Lane C, Piot P, Beavogui AH, Kieh M, Leigh B, et al.. Prevention of Ebola virus disease through vaccination: where we are in 2018. Lancet. 2018;392:787–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31710-0
    1. Henao-Restrepo AM, Camacho A, Longini IM, Watson CH, Edmunds WJ, Egger M, et al.. Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!). Lancet. 2017;389:505–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32621-6
    1. World Health Organization. Preliminary results on the efficacy of rVSV-ZEBOV-GP Ebola vaccine using the ring vaccination strategy in the control of an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: an example of integration of research into epidemic response. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. FDA. First FDA-approved vaccine for the prevention of Ebola virus disease, marking a critical milestone in public health preparedness and response. Press Release 19 December 2019. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. Vaccine against Ebola: Commission grants first-ever market authorisation. Press Release 11 November 2019. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. World Health Organization. WHO prequalifies Ebola vaccine, paving the way for its use in high-risk countries. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. World Health Organization. Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on immunization interim recommendations on vaccination against Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) 7 May 2019. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. Vaccine against Ebola: Commission grants new market authorizations. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. “The Ministry of Health Launched UMURINZI Ebola Vaccine Program Campaign” Press release. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. Milligan ID, Gibani MM, Sewell R, Clutterbuck EA, Campbell D, Plested E, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of novel Adenovirus type 26- and Modified Vaccinia Ankara-vectored Ebola vaccines: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:1610–23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4218
    1. Mutua G, Anzala O, Luhn K, Robinson C, Bockstal V, Anumendem D, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose heterologous vaccine regimen with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccines: 12-month data from a phase 1 randomized clinical trial in Nairobi, Kenya. J Infect Dis. 2019;220:57–67. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz071
    1. Anywaine Z, Whitworth H, Kaleebu P, Praygod G, Shukarev G, Manno D, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose heterologous vaccination regimen with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccines: 12-month data from a phase 1 randomized clinical trial in Uganda and Tanzania. J Infect Dis. 2019;220:46–56. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz070
    1. DAIDS Adverse Event Grading Tables. [cited 2021 Sept 1]. Available from: .
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: Toxicity grading scale for healthy adult and adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials. 2007 [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: .
    1. Logue J, Tuznik K, Follmann D, Grandits G, Marchand J, Reilly C, et al.. Use of the Filovirus Animal Non-Clinical Group (FANG) Ebola virus immuno-assay requires fewer study participants to power a study than the Alpha Diagnostic International assay. J Virol Methods. 2018;255:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.02.018
    1. Horton H, Thomas E, Stucky JA, Frank I, Moodie Z, Huang Y, et al.. Optimization and validation of an 8-color Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS) assay to quantify antigen-specific T Cells induced by vaccination. J Immunol Methods. 2007;323(1):39–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.03.002
    1. Pollard AJ, Launay O, Lelievre J-D, Lacabaratz C, Grande S, Goldstein N, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen: a phase 2 randomised clinical study in Europe (EBOVAC2). Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. doi: S1473-3099(20)30476-X
    1. Gross L, Lhomme E, Pasin C, Richert L, Thiebaut R. Ebola vaccine development: systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical studies, and meta-analysis of determinants of antibody response variability after vaccination. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;74:83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.06.022
    1. Ishola D, Manno D, Afolabi MO, Keshinro B, Bockstal V, Rogers B, et al.. Safety and long-term immunogenicity of a two-dose Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial in Sierra Leone. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00125-0
    1. Afolabi MO, Ishola D, Manno D, Keshinro B, Bockstal V, Rogers B, et al.. Safety and immunogenicity of a two-dose Ad26. ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine in children: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial in Sierra Leone. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00128-6
    1. Callendret B, Vellinga J, Wunderlich K, Rodriguez A, Steigerwald R, Dirmeier U, et al.. A prophylactic multivalent vaccine against different filovirus species is immunogenic and provides protection from lethal infections with Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus species in non-human primates. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192312
    1. Marzi A, Engelmann F, Feldmann F, Haberthur K, Shupert WL, Brining D, et al.. Antibodies are necessary for rVSV/ZEBOV-GP-mediated protection against lethal Ebola virus challenge in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:1893–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209591110
    1. Halperin SA, Das R, Onorato MT, Liu K, Martin J, Grant-Klein RJ, et al.. Immunogenicity, lot consistency, and extended safety of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults. J Infect Dis. 2019;220:1127–35. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz241
    1. Balelli I, Pasin C, Prague M, Crauste F, Effelterre TV, Bockstal V, et al.. A model for establishment, maintenance and reactivation of the immune response after vaccination against Ebola virus. J Theor Biol. 2020;495:110254. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110254
    1. Pasin C, Balelli I, Van Effelterre T, Bockstal V, Solforosi L, Prague M, et al.. Dynamics of the humoral immune response to a prime-boost Ebola vaccine: quantification and sources of variation. J Virol. 2019;93:e0057. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00579-19

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren