Virtual reality as a distraction technique in chronic pain patients

Brenda K Wiederhold, Kenneth Gao, Camelia Sulea, Mark D Wiederhold, Brenda K Wiederhold, Kenneth Gao, Camelia Sulea, Mark D Wiederhold

Abstract

We explored the use of virtual reality distraction techniques for use as adjunctive therapy to treat chronic pain. Virtual environments were specifically created to provide pleasant and engaging experiences where patients navigated on their own through rich and varied simulated worlds. Real-time physiological monitoring was used as a guide to determine the effectiveness and sustainability of this intervention. Human factors studies showed that virtual navigation is a safe and effective method for use with chronic pain patients. Chronic pain patients demonstrated significant relief in subjective ratings of pain that corresponded to objective measurements in peripheral, noninvasive physiological measures.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
The scales of sense of being in the virtual reality (VR) simulated environment—Ease of use, Immersive, and Interactive effects on a scale from 1 to 7, where 7 represents the normal experience of being in a place. 1=“not at all,” 7=“very much.” VR environment was easy to use, interactive, immersive, and real.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
The scales of sense of being in the VR—how real was VR versus the simulated environment, similarities between the simulated environment and the actual places patients visited, how focused on the tasks patients were during the simulated environment, on a scale from 1 to 7, where 7 represents the normal experience of being in a place. 1=“not at all,” 7=“very much.” VR was immersive and real.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Sickness exploration questionnaire scores in terms of general discomfort, fatigue, headache, eyestrain, and nausea, their mean scales are all
FIG. 4.

Comparison of subjective pain ratings.

FIG. 4.

Comparison of subjective pain ratings.

FIG. 4.
Comparison of subjective pain ratings.
FIG. 5.

Comparison of objective pain ratings.

FIG. 5.

Comparison of objective pain ratings.

FIG. 5.
Comparison of objective pain ratings.
FIG. 6.

Comparison of reported pain intensity.

FIG. 6.

Comparison of reported pain intensity.

FIG. 6.
Comparison of reported pain intensity.
FIG. 7.

Comparison of heart rate.

FIG. 7.

Comparison of heart rate.

FIG. 7.
Comparison of heart rate.
All figures (7)
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Comparison of subjective pain ratings.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Comparison of objective pain ratings.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Comparison of reported pain intensity.
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Comparison of heart rate.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren