Achievement of Remission Endpoints with Secukinumab Over 3 Years in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies

Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip Van den Bosch, Pedro M Machado, Lianne S Gensler, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Bintu Sherif, Erhard Quebe-Fehling, Brian Porter, Corine Gaillez, Atul Deodhar, Xenofon Baraliakos, Filip Van den Bosch, Pedro M Machado, Lianne S Gensler, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Bintu Sherif, Erhard Quebe-Fehling, Brian Porter, Corine Gaillez, Atul Deodhar

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical remission in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been determined using composite indices such as the AS Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS-ID), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria partial remission (ASAS-PR), and low Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to evaluate the proportion of secukinumab-treated patients with AS achieving remission defined based on the ASDAS-ID (score < 1.3), ASAS-PR or BASDAI score ≤ 2.

Methods: The analysis pooled data from the MEASURE 1 and 2 studies over 3 years. The proportion of patients who achieved ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, or BASDAI ≤ 2 with secukinumab was compared with placebo at week 16; results for secukinumab-treated patients were summarized through week 156. Sustainability of each criterion was assessed from week 16 to 156 using shift analysis. The association between each of these criteria and specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as health-related quality of life, function, fatigue, and work impairment, was also explored.

Results: At week 16, a higher proportion of secukinumab-treated patients versus placebo achieved ASDAS-ID (17.6 vs. 3.5%), ASAS-PR (15.4 vs. 4.1%), or BASDAI ≤ 2 (22.3 vs. 6.4%) criteria (all P < 0.0001), which were sustained through 156 weeks. Shift analysis showed that the majority of secukinumab-treated patients achieving remission at week 16 maintained their status at week 156 (ASDAS-ID, 57.1%; ASAS-PR, 68.0% and BASDAI ≤ 2, 74.3%). Remission was also associated with improved PROs over 156 weeks.

Conclusions: Secukinumab-treated patients maintained ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, or BASDAI ≤ 2 from week 16 up to 3 years. Patients who achieved at least one of the three responses/states, reported improvement in PROs, which suggests an association of clinical remission/ID with PROs in patients with active AS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01358175, NCT01863732, and NCT01649375.

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Axial spondyloarthritis; Biologics; Interleukin-17; Low disease activity; Patient-reported outcomes; Remission; Secukinumab.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion of patients with ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR and BASDAI ≤ 2 through week 156 (FAS). Analysis is based on observed data. aN = 159 after week 104, bN = 161 after week 104. *P < 0.0001,†P < 0.001, §P < 0.01, and ‡P < 0.05 versus placebo; P values are from Fisher’s exact test and are displayed up to week 16, prior to placebo re-randomization. N = number of patients included in the analysis, n = number of evaluable patients. ASAS-PR Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for partial remission, ASDAS-ID Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score for inactive disease, BASDAI Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, FAS full analysis set
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of patients with ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, and BASDAI ≤ 2 through week 156 (by TNFi status). Analysis based on observed data. aN = 114 after week 104, bN = 114 after week 104, cN = 45 after week 104, dN = 47 after week 104. *P < 0.0001, †P < 0.001, §P < 0.01, ‡P < 0.05 versus placebo; P values are from Fisher’s exact test and are displayed up to week 16, prior to placebo re-randomization. N = number of patients included in the analysis, n = number of evaluable patients. IR Inadequate response, PR partial remission, TNFi tumor necrosis factor inhibitor
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Shift analysis from week 16. Proportion of patients with ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, and BASDAI ≤ 2 responses at weeks 104 or 156. Shift analysis was performed on mutually exclusive categories in patients for whom data were available at both week 16 and weeks 104 or 156. N = total number of patients included in the analysis, n = number of evaluable patients who completed week 16. HDA High disease activity (2.1–3.5), ID inactive disease (< 1.3); LDA, low disease activity (1.3 to < 2.1), VHDA very high disease activity (> 3.5)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Association of ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, and BASDAI ≤ 2 with PROs (change from baseline to 156 weeks; coefficient in MMRM). Data are from MMRM, with analysis visit and TNFi status (overall pooled sample only) as factors, and weight, baseline score, and remission status as continuous covariates. Remission status by analysis visit is included as an interaction term in the model. An unstructured covariance structure is used for this model. ASQoL Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) Quality of Life, BASFI Bath AS Functional Index, CI confidence interval, FACIT Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, MCS mental component summary of SF-36, MMRM mixed-effects models for repeated measures, PCS physical component summary of SF-36, PROs patient-reported outcomes, SF-36 Short-Form 36 health survey, WPAI-GH Work Productivity and Activity Impairment–General Health

References

    1. Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet. 2007;369(9570):1379–1390. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60635-7.
    1. Dougados M, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2127–2137.
    1. Gao X, Wendling D, Botteman MF, Carter JA, Rao S, Cifaldi M. Clinical and economic burden of extra-articular manifestations in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1054–1063.
    1. Smolen JS, Schols M, Braun J, et al. Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(1):3–17.
    1. Poddubnyy D, Protopopov M, Haibel H, Braun J, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J. High disease activity according to the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score is associated with accelerated radiographic spinal progression in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis: results from the GErman SPondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(12):2114–2118.
    1. Ramiro S, van der Heijde D, van Tubergen A, et al. Higher disease activity leads to more structural damage in the spine in ankylosing spondylitis: 12-year longitudinal data from the OASIS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1455–1461.
    1. Baraliakos X, Berenbaum F, Favalli EG, et al. Challenges and advances in targeting remission in axial spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(2):153–157.
    1. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewe R, et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):978–991.
    1. Schoels MM, Braun J, Dougados M, et al. Treating axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis, to target: results of a systematic literature search to support an international treat-to-target recommendation in spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):238–242.
    1. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Kiltz U. Secukinumab (AIN457) in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016;16(5):711–722.
    1. Paine A, Ritchlin CT. Targeting the interleukin-23/17 axis in axial spondyloarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016;28(4):359–367.
    1. Ward MM, Deodhar A, Akl EA, et al. American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network 2015 Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(2):151–166.
    1. Baraliakos X, Haibel H, Fritz C, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis with etanercept-sustained efficacy and safety after seven years. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(3):R67.
    1. Baraliakos X, Listing J, Fritz C, et al. Persistent clinical efficacy and safety of infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis after 8 years–early clinical response predicts long-term outcome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50(9):1690–1699.
    1. Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X, et al. 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(6):896–904.
    1. Baeten D, Baraliakos X, Braun J, et al. Anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab in treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9906):1705–1713.
    1. Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, et al. Secukinumab, an interleukin-17A inhibitor, ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(26):2534–2548.
    1. Baraliakos X, Kivitz AJ, Deodhar AA, et al. Long-term effects of interleukin-17A inhibition with secukinumab in active ankylosing spondylitis: 3-year efficacy and safety results from an extension of the Phase 3 MEASURE 1 trial. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36(1):50–55.
    1. Marzo-Ortega H, Sieper J, Kivitz A, et al. Secukinumab provides sustained improvements in the signs and symptoms of active ankylosing spondylitis with high retention rate: 3-year results from the phase III trial, MEASURE 2. RMD Open. 2017;3(2):e000592.
    1. Marzo-Ortega H, Sieper J, Kivitz A, et al. Secukinumab and sustained improvement in signs and symptoms of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis through two years: results from a phase III study. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(7):1020–1029.
    1. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, et al. Effect of secukinumab on clinical and radiographic outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year results from the randomised phase III MEASURE 1 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1070–1077.
    1. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, et al. Secukinumab shows sustained efficacy and low structural progression in ankylosing spondylitis: 4-year results from the MEASURE 1 study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58(5):859–868.
    1. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361–368.
    1. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(12):2286–2291.
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
    1. Machado P, Landewe R, Lie E, et al. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(1):47–53.
    1. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(Suppl 2):ii1–44.
    1. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Dawes PT. Patient-assessed health in ankylosing spondylitis: a structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44(5):577–586.
    1. Doward L, Spoorenberg A, Cook SA, et al. Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(1):20–26.
    1. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997;13(2):63–74.
    1. Ware JE., Jr SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000;25(24):3130–3139.
    1. Loeppke R, Hymel PA, Lofland JH, et al. Health-related workplace productivity measurement: general and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(4):349–359.
    1. Machado PM, Landewe R, Heijde DV, et al. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): 2018 update of the nomenclature for disease activity states. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(10):1539–1540.
    1. Paccou J, Bacle-Boutry MA, Solau-Gervais E, Bele-Philippe P, Flipo R-M. Dosage adjustment of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor in ankylosing spondylitis is effective in maintaining remission in clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(7):1418–1423.
    1. Anderson JJ, Baron G, van der Heijde D, Felson DT, Dougados M. Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short-term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(8):1876–1886.
    1. Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. Outcome of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis after two years of therapy with etanercept: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging data. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(6):856–863.
    1. Arends S, van der Veer E, Kamps FB, et al. Patient-tailored dose reduction of TNF-alpha blocking agents in ankylosing spondylitis patients with stable low disease activity in daily clinical practice. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33(2):174–180.
    1. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9313):1187–1193.
    1. Davis JC, Jr, Van Der Heijde D, Braun J, et al. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (etanercept) for treating ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(11):3230–3236.
    1. Inman RD, Davis JC, Jr, Heijde D, et al. Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(11):3402–3412.
    1. van der Heijde D, Dijkmans B, Geusens P, et al. Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT) Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(2):582–591.
    1. van der Heijde D, Kivitz A, Schiff MH, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(7):2136–2146.
    1. van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Braun J, et al. The effect of golimumab therapy on disease activity and health-related quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year results of the GO-RAISE trial. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(6):1095–1103.
    1. Landewe R, Braun J, Deodhar A, et al. Efficacy of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms of axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis: 24-week results of a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled Phase 3 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):39–47.
    1. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, et al. Persistent clinical response to the anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over 3 years. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44(5):670–676.
    1. Deodhar AA, Dougados M, Baeten DL, et al. Effect of secukinumab on patient-reported outcomes in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a phase III randomized trial (MEASURE 1) Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(12):2901–2910.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren