Impact of an ultrasound-driven diagnostic protocol at early intensive-care stay: a randomized-controlled trial

Julio Pontet, Christian Yic, José L Díaz-Gómez, Pablo Rodriguez, Igor Sviridenko, Diego Méndez, Sylvia Noveri, Ana Soca, Mario Cancela, Julio Pontet, Christian Yic, José L Díaz-Gómez, Pablo Rodriguez, Igor Sviridenko, Diego Méndez, Sylvia Noveri, Ana Soca, Mario Cancela

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a tool in increasing use, but there is still a lack of basics for its routine use and evidence of its impact in intensive care.

Objective: To measure the impact of POCUS on resource utilization, diagnostic accuracy, and clinical management in medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods: Prospective, controlled study, in two polyvalent ICUs. The patients were randomly assigned to POCUS or control group.

Interventions: POCUS patients received systematic ultrasound examination of optic nerve, lung/pleura, heart, abdomen, and venous system, performed at the bedside by trained intensivists. Control patients were treated by critical care specialists who do not perform ultrasound in their clinical practice.

Results: We included 80 patients, 40 per group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, APACHE II score, or admission diagnosis. POCUS group used fewer resources per patient in the first 5 days of hospitalization: chest radiography (2.6 ± 2.0 vs 4.1 ± 3.5, P = 0.01), additional ultrasound evaluations performed by a radiology specialist (0.6 ± 0.7 vs 1.1 ± 0.7, P = 0.002), and computed tomography studies (0.5 ± 0.6 vs 0.9 ± 0.7, P = 0.007). Time to perform any requested ultrasound evaluation after ICU admission was 2.1 ± 1.6 h versus 7.7 ± 6.7 h (P = 0.001). Systematic ultrasound evaluation led to better characterization of ICU admission diagnosis in 14 (35%) patients and change in clinical management in 24 (60%). POCUS group had lower fluid balance at 48 and 96 h after admission (P = 0.01) and spent less time mechanically ventilated (5.1 ± 5.7 days vs 8.8 ± 9.4, P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Systematic application of POCUS may decrease utilization of conventional diagnostic imaging resources and time of mechanical ventilation, and facilitate meticulous intravenous fluid administration in critically ill patients during the first week of stay in the ICU. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03608202.

Keywords: Clinical impact; Critical care; Diagnostic techniques and procedures; Point-of-care systems; Point-of-care ultrasound; Ultrasound protocol.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Linear correlation between fluid balance at 48 h and left-ventricular ejection fraction. Pearson correlation r = 0.57, P = 0.002. FB fluid balance, LVEF left-ventricular ejection fraction

References

    1. Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M, et al. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients—part I: general ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:2479–2502. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001216.
    1. Manno E, Navarra M, Faccio L, et al. Deep impact of ultrasound in the intensive care unit: the “ICU-sound” protocol. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:801–809. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318264c621.
    1. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:749–757. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487.
    1. Narasimhan M, Koenig SJ, Mayo PH. A whole-body approach to point of care ultrasound. Chest. 2016;150:772–776. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.040.
    1. Bernier-Jean A, Albert M, Shiloh AL, Eisen LA, Williamson D, Beaulieu Y. The diagnostic and therapeutic impact of point-of-care ultrasonography in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2017;32:197–203. doi: 10.1177/0885066615606682.
    1. Bossone E, DiGiovine B, Watts S, et al. Range and prevalence of cardiac abnormalities in patients hospitalized in a medical ICU. Chest. 2002;122:1370–1376. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.4.1370.
    1. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Ultrasonography for clinical decision-making and intervention in airway management: from the mouth to the lungs and pleurae. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:253–279. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0309-5.
    1. Laursen CB, Sloth E, Lassen AT, et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:638–646. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70135-3.
    1. Oks M, Cleven KL, Cardenas-Garcia J, et al. The effect of point-of-care ultrasonography on imaging studies in the medical ICU: a comparative study. Chest. 2014;146:1574–1577. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0728.
    1. Pontet J, Yic C, Diaz-Gomez J, et al. Ultrasonografía En Medicina de Urgencias, Terapia Intensiva Y Anestesia. 1st ed: Montevideo; 2016
    1. Volpicelli G, Lamorte A, Tullio M, et al. Point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the evaluation of undifferentiated hypotension in the emergency department. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1290–1298. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2919-7.
    1. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(9):1834–1837. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2233-5.
    1. Vignon P, Frank MB, Lesage J, et al. Hand-held echocardiography with Doppler capability for the assessment of critically-ill patients: is it reliable? Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:718–723. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2128-x.
    1. Geri G, Vignon P, Aubry A, Fedou AL, Charron C, Silva S, Repessé X, Vieillard-Baron A. Cardiovascular clusters in septic shock combining clinical and echocardiographic parameters: a post hoc analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(5):657–667. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05596-z.
    1. Nair S, Sauthoff H. Assessing extravascular lung water with ultrasound: a tool to individualize fluid management? J Intensive Care Med. 2019 doi: 10.1177/0885066619855000.
    1. Orme RM, Oram MP, McKinstry CE. Impact of echocardiography on patient management in the intensive care unit: an audit of district general hospital practice. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:340–344. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen378.
    1. . Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging. McComb BL, Chung JH, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria routine chest radiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2016;31:W13–15. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000200.
    1. Krinsley JS. Test-ordering strategy in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2003;18:330–339. doi: 10.1177/0885066603256344.
    1. Expert Round Table on Echocardiography in ICU International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:654–666. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3228-5.
    1. Kue R, Brown P, Ness C, Scheulen J. Adverse clinical events during intrahospital transport by a specialized team: a preliminary report. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20:153–161. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2011478.
    1. Smith I, Fleming S, Cernaianu A. Mishaps during transport from the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:278–281. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199003000-00006.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren