Effects of a Hypnosis Session Before General Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Minor Breast Cancer Surgery: The HYPNOSEIN Randomized Clinical Trial

Jibba Amraoui, Camille Pouliquen, Julien Fraisse, Jacques Dubourdieu, Sophie Rey Dit Guzer, Gilles Leclerc, Hélène de Forges, Marta Jarlier, Marian Gutowski, Jean-Pierre Bleuse, Chloé Janiszewski, Jésus Diaz, Philippe Cuvillon, Jibba Amraoui, Camille Pouliquen, Julien Fraisse, Jacques Dubourdieu, Sophie Rey Dit Guzer, Gilles Leclerc, Hélène de Forges, Marta Jarlier, Marian Gutowski, Jean-Pierre Bleuse, Chloé Janiszewski, Jésus Diaz, Philippe Cuvillon

Abstract

Importance: Hypnosis is now widespread in medical practice and is emerging as an alternative technique for pain management and anxiety. However, its effects on postoperative outcomes remain unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a preoperative hypnosis session for reducing postoperative breast pain in patients who underwent minor breast cancer surgery.

Design, setting, and participants: The HYPNOSEIN prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 7, 2014, to April 5, 2016. In this multicenter study in France, 150 women scheduled for minor breast cancer surgery were randomized between control and hypnosis arms, and 148 (71 control and 77 hypnosis) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis.

Intervention: On the day of surgery, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the control arm or the hypnosis arm. Patients (but not the care teams) were blinded to the arm to which they were assigned. A 15-minute hypnosis session before general anesthesia in the operating room was performed in the hypnosis arm.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was breast pain reduction (by 2 on a visual analog scale), assessed immediately before discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary end points were nausea/vomiting, fatigue, comfort/well-being, anxiety, and PACU length of stay, assessed at different times until postoperative day 30.

Results: The median patient age was 57 years (range, 33-79 years) in the control arm and 53 years (range, 20-84 years) in the hypnosis arm. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 arms. The median duration of the hypnosis session was 6 minutes (range, 2-15 minutes). The use of intraoperative opioids and hypnotics was lower in the hypnosis arm. The mean (SD) breast pain score (range, 0-10) was 1.75 (1.59) in the control arm vs 2.63 (1.62) in the hypnosis arm (P = .004). At PACU discharge and with longer follow-up, no statistically significant difference in breast pain was reported. Fatigue was significantly lower in the hypnosis arm on the evening of surgery (mean [SD] score, 3.81 [2.15] in the control arm vs 2.99 [2.56] in the hypnosis arm; P = .03). The median PACU length of stay was 60 minutes (range, 20-290 minutes) in the control arm vs 46 minutes (range, 5-100 minutes) in the hypnosis arm (P = .002). Exploratory analyses according to patient perception of whether she received hypnosis showed significantly lower fatigue scores in the perceived hypnosis subgroup on the evening of surgery (mean [SD], 4.13 [2.26] for no perceived hypnosis vs 2.97 [2.42] for perceived hypnosis; P = .01). Anxiety was also significantly lower on the evening of surgery in the perceived hypnosis subgroup (mean [SD], 0.75 [1.64] for perceived hypnosis vs 1.67 [2.29] for no perceived hypnosis; P = .03).

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this study do not support a benefit of hypnosis on postoperative breast pain in women undergoing minor breast cancer surgery. However, other outcomes seem to be improved, which needs to be confirmed by further studies.

Trial registration: EudraCT Identifier: 2014-A00681-46 and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03253159.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Diaz reported receiving grants and other funding from Grunenthal outside of the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. CONSORT Diagram of the Study
Figure.. CONSORT Diagram of the Study
CONSORT indicates Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. aPatients screened were reported in 2 participating centers and not in the third (center 3).

References

    1. Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, et al. . Time to surgery and breast cancer survival in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(3):-. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4508
    1. Merrill AY, Brown DR, Klepin HD, Levine EA, Howard-Mcnatt M. Outcomes after mastectomy and lumpectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians with early-stage breast cancer. Am Surg. 2017;83(8):887-894.
    1. Powell R, Scott NW, Manyande A, et al. . Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(5):CD008646. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008646.pub2
    1. Abdallah FW, MacLean D, Madjdpour C, Cil T, Bhatia A, Brull R. Pectoralis and serratus fascial plane blocks each provide early analgesic benefits following ambulatory breast cancer surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(1):294-302. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001975
    1. Abdallah FW, Morgan PJ, Cil T, et al. . Ultrasound-guided multilevel paravertebral blocks and total intravenous anesthesia improve the quality of recovery after ambulatory breast tumor resection. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(3):703-713. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000436117.52143.bc
    1. Mitchell A, McCrea P, Inglis K, Porter G. A randomized, controlled trial comparing acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine (Tylenol 3) after outpatient breast surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3792-3800. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2447-7
    1. Maurice-Szamburski A, Auquier P, Viarre-Oreal V, et al. ; PremedX Study Investigators . Effect of sedative premedication on patient experience after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(9):916-925. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1108
    1. Zhang Q, Gao Z, Wang H, et al. . The effect of pre-treatment with transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on the quality of recovery after ambulatory breast surgery: a prospective, randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(8):832-839. doi:10.1111/anae.12639
    1. Hole J, Hirsch M, Ball E, Meads C. Music as an aid for postoperative recovery in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2015;386(10004):1659-1671. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60169-6
    1. Enqvist B, Björklund C, Engman M, Jakobsson J. Preoperative hypnosis reduces postoperative vomiting after surgery of the breasts: a prospective, randomized and blinded study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41(8):1028-1032. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04831.x
    1. Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, et al. . Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9214):1486-1490. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02162-0
    1. Montgomery GH, Bovbjerg DH, Schnur JB, et al. . A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(17):1304-1312. doi:10.1093/jnci/djm106
    1. Montgomery GH, David D, Winkel G, Silverstein JH, Bovbjerg DH. The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(6):1639-1645.
    1. Kekecs Z, Nagy T, Varga K. The effectiveness of suggestive techniques in reducing postoperative side effects: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(6):1407-1419. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000466
    1. World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
    1. European Medicines Agency Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). . Published December 1, 2016. Accessed June 27, 2018.
    1. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995;7(1):89-91. doi:10.1016/0952-8180(94)00001-K
    1. Apfel CC, Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roos A, Roewer N. Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(2):234-240. doi:10.1093/bja/88.2.234
    1. Machin D, Campbell MJ, Tan SB, Tan SH. Comparing two independent groups for continuous data In: Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008:47-57. doi:10.1002/9781444300710.ch5
    1. Bennett S, Pigott A, Beller EM, Haines T, Meredith P, Delaney C. Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD008144.
    1. Berger AM, Gerber LH, Mayer DK. Cancer-related fatigue: implications for breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012;118(8)(suppl):2261-2269. doi:10.1002/cncr.27475
    1. Karst M, Winterhalter M, Münte S, et al. . Auricular acupuncture for dental anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(2):295-300. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000242531.12722.fd
    1. Wang SM, Maranets I, Weinberg ME, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Kain ZN. Parental auricular acupuncture as an adjunct for parental presence during induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(6):1399-1404. doi:10.1097/00000542-200406000-00011

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren