The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19
Tony Zitek, Tony Zitek
Abstract
Many public officials are calling for increased testing for the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and some governments have taken extraordinary measures to increase the availability of testing. However, little has been published about the sensitivity and specificity of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs that are commonly used for testing. This narrative review evaluates the literature regarding the accuracy of these tests, and makes recommendations based on this literature. In brief, a negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test is insufficient to rule out COVID-19. Thus, over-reliance on the results of the test may be dangerous, and the push for widespread testing may be overstated.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.
References
- Pneumonia of unknown cause — China. World Health Organization; [Accessed April 5, 2020]. Available at:
- ABC 17 New Team. SUNDAY UPDATES: Number of Cole County COVID-19 cases rises to 4. [Accessed March 22, 2020]. Available at:
- Mumphrey N. Orleans, Jefferson Parish testing sites expand to anyone showing symptoms of COVID-19. [Accessed March 22, 2020]. Available at:
- Burbank D. Gov. Burgum announced new executive order to allow expanded COVID-19 testing. [Accessed March 22, 2020]. Available at: .
- Federal drive-thru COVID-19 site to expand testing criteria. [Accessed March 22, 2020]. Available at: .
- Flechas J. COVID-19 testing site to open at Marlins Park as tests and supplies arrive in Miami. [Accessed March 22, 2020]. Available at: .
- Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3):2000045.
- Ren X, Liu Y, Chen H, et al. Application and optimization of RT-PCR in diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv. 2020. [Accessed March 22, 2020]. Available at: .
- Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020 In press.
- Interim Guidelines for Collecting, Handling, and Testing Clinical Specimens from Persons for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [Accessed March 22, 2020]. Available at: .
- Winichakoon P, Chaiwarith R, Liwsrisakun C, et al. Negative nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab does not rule out COVID-19. J Clin Microbiol. 2020 In press.
- Xie C, Jiang L, Huang G, et al. Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:264–7.
- Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, et al. Chest CT for typical 2019-nCoV pneumonia: relationship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology. 2020 200343. In press.
- Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, et al. Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology. 2020 200432. In Press.
- Wu J, Liu J, Zhao X, et al. Clinical characteristics of imported cases of COVID-19 in Jiangsu Province: a multicenter descriptive study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 In Press.
- Young BE, Ong SWX, Kalimuddin S, et al. Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. JAMA. 2020 In Press.
- Siegler K. Many who need testing for COVID-19 fail to get access. [Accessed April 5, 2020]. Available at: .
Source: PubMed