Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 4 supplementary foods for treating moderate acute malnutrition: results from a cluster-randomized intervention trial in Sierra Leone

Stacy P Griswold, Breanne K Langlois, Ye Shen, Ilana R Cliffer, Devika J Suri, Shelley Walton, Ken Chui, Irwin H Rosenberg, Aminata S Koroma, Donna Wegner, Amir Hassan, Mark J Manary, Stephen A Vosti, Patrick Webb, Beatrice L Rogers, Stacy P Griswold, Breanne K Langlois, Ye Shen, Ilana R Cliffer, Devika J Suri, Shelley Walton, Ken Chui, Irwin H Rosenberg, Aminata S Koroma, Donna Wegner, Amir Hassan, Mark J Manary, Stephen A Vosti, Patrick Webb, Beatrice L Rogers

Abstract

Background: Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) affects 33 million children annually. Investments in formulations of corn-soy blended flours and lipid-based nutrient supplements have effectively improved MAM recovery rates. Information costs and cost-effectiveness differences are still needed.

Objectives: We assessed recovery and sustained recovery rates of MAM children receiving a supplementary food: ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF), corn soy whey blend with fortified vegetable oil (CSWB w/oil), or Super Cereal Plus with amylase (SC + A) compared to Corn Soy Blend Plus with fortified vegetable oil (CSB+ w/oil). We also estimated differences in costs and cost effectiveness of each supplement.

Methods: In Sierra Leone, we randomly assigned 29 health centers to provide a supplement containing 550 kcal/d for ∼12 wk to 2691 children with MAM aged 6-59 mo. We calculated cost per enrollee, cost per child who recovered, and cost per child who sustained recovery each from 2 perspectives: program perspective and caregiver perspective, combined.

Results: Of 2653 MAM children (98.6%) with complete data, 1676 children (63%) recovered. There were no significant differences in the odds of recovery compared to CSB+ w/oil [0.83 (95% CI: 0.64-1.08) for CSWB w/oil, 1.01 (95% CI: 0.78-1.3) for SC + A, 1.05 (95% CI: 0.82-1.34) for RUSF]. The odds of sustaining recovery were significantly lower for RUSF (0.7; 95% CI 0.49-0.99) but not CSWB w/oil or SC + A [1.08 (95% CI: 0.73-1.6) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.67-1.4), respectively] when compared to CSB+ w/oil. Costs per enrollee [US dollars (USD)/child] ranged from $105/child in RUSF to $112/child in SC + A and costs per recovered child (USD/child) ranged from $163/child in RUSF to $179/child in CSWB w/oil, with overlapping uncertainty ranges. Costs were highest per sustained recovery (USD/child), ranging from $214/child with the CSB+ w/oil to $226/child with the SC + A, with overlapping uncertainty ranges.

Conclusions: The 4 supplements performed similarly across recovery (but not sustained recovery) and costed measures. Analyses of posttreatment outcomes are necessary to estimate the full cost of MAM treatment. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03146897.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; moderate acute malnutrition; relapse; supplementary feeding program; sustained recovery; wasting.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Trial profile. MUAC error at start was defined as mean of 3 MUAC measurements >12.5 cm or 

FIGURE 2

Cost per child who recovered…

FIGURE 2

Cost per child who recovered from MAM: program perspective compared to program +…

FIGURE 2
Cost per child who recovered from MAM: program perspective compared to program + caregiver perspectives. Error bars for both perspectives use 95% CIs of recovery rate from the adjusted effectiveness model. Error bars for program and caregiver perspectives also incorporate uncertainty around the time cost of caregivers (±1 SD). Abbreviations: CSB+ w/oil, Corn Soy Blend Plus with fortified vegetable oil; CSWB w/oil, corn soy whey blend with fortified vegetable oil; MAM, moderate acute malnutrition; RUSF, ready-to-use supplementary food; SC+ A, Super Cereal Plus with amylase; USD, United States dollar.

FIGURE 3

Cost per child who sustained…

FIGURE 3

Cost per child who sustained recovery from MAM 1 mo after recovery: program…

FIGURE 3
Cost per child who sustained recovery from MAM 1 mo after recovery: program perspective compared to program + caregiver perspectives. Error bars for both perspectives used point estimates of sustained recovery from 2 adjusted models that treated missed visits at 1 mo postintervention, as all sustained recovery and as all relapsed. Error bars for program and caregiver perspectives also incorporate uncertainty around the time cost of caregivers (±1 SD). Abbreviations: CSB+ w/oil, Corn Soy Blend Plus with fortified vegetable oil; CSWB w/oil, corn soy whey blend with fortified vegetable oil; MAM, moderate acute malnutrition; RUSF, ready-to-use supplementary food; SC+ A, Super Cereal Plus with amylase; USD, United States dollar.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cost per child who recovered from MAM: program perspective compared to program + caregiver perspectives. Error bars for both perspectives use 95% CIs of recovery rate from the adjusted effectiveness model. Error bars for program and caregiver perspectives also incorporate uncertainty around the time cost of caregivers (±1 SD). Abbreviations: CSB+ w/oil, Corn Soy Blend Plus with fortified vegetable oil; CSWB w/oil, corn soy whey blend with fortified vegetable oil; MAM, moderate acute malnutrition; RUSF, ready-to-use supplementary food; SC+ A, Super Cereal Plus with amylase; USD, United States dollar.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Cost per child who sustained recovery from MAM 1 mo after recovery: program perspective compared to program + caregiver perspectives. Error bars for both perspectives used point estimates of sustained recovery from 2 adjusted models that treated missed visits at 1 mo postintervention, as all sustained recovery and as all relapsed. Error bars for program and caregiver perspectives also incorporate uncertainty around the time cost of caregivers (±1 SD). Abbreviations: CSB+ w/oil, Corn Soy Blend Plus with fortified vegetable oil; CSWB w/oil, corn soy whey blend with fortified vegetable oil; MAM, moderate acute malnutrition; RUSF, ready-to-use supplementary food; SC+ A, Super Cereal Plus with amylase; USD, United States dollar.

References

    1. Development Initiatives. 2018 Global Nutrition Report: shining a light to spur action on nutrition. Bristol (UK): Development Initiatives; 2018.
    1. Development Initiatives. 2020 Global Nutrition Report. Action on equity to end malnutrition. Bristol (UK): Development Initiatives; 2020.
    1. UNICEF . Children, food and nutrition: the state of the world children 2019. New York: UNICEF; 2019.
    1. UNICEF, World Health Organization, World Bank . UNICEF-WHO-World Bank: joint child malnutrition estimates 2020 edition–interactive dashboard. Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2020.
    1. Kennedy E, Branca F, Webb P, Bhutta Z, Brown R. Setting the scene: an overview of issues related to policies and programs for moderate and severe acute malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull. 2015;36(Suppl 1):S9–S14.
    1. Annan RA, Webb P, Brown R. Management of moderate acute malnutrition (MAM): current knowledge and practice collaborating to improve the management of acute malnutrition worldwide. CMAM Forum. 2014.
    1. Manary M, Chang CY. Comparing milk fortified corn-soy blend (CSB++), soy ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF), and soy/whey RUSF (Supplementary Plumpy®) in the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition. Washington (DC): FANTA-2 Bridge/FHI 360; 2012.
    1. LaGrone LN, Trehan I, Meuli GJ, Wang RJ, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta K, Manary MJ. A novel fortified blended flour, corn-soy blend “plus-plus,” is not inferior to lipid-based ready-to-use supplementary foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Malawian children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(1):212–9.
    1. Roubert A, Johnson Q, Walton S, Webb P. Food aid packaging challenges and opportunities: a review of the packaging of fortified vegetable oil, corn soy blend plus, and super cereal plus a report from the Food Aid Quality Review. Boston (MA): Tufts University; 2018.
    1. Das JK, Salam RA, Saeed M, Kazmi FA, Bhutta ZA. Effectiveness of interventions for managing acute malnutrition in children under five years of age in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12(1):116.
    1. Chang CY, Trehan I, Wang RJ, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta K, Deitchler M, Manary MJ. Children successfully treated for moderate acute malnutrition remain at risk for malnutrition and death in the subsequent year after recovery. J Nutr. 2013;143(2):215–20.
    1. Trehan I, Banerjee S, Murray E, Ryan KN, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta KM, Manary MJ. Extending supplementary feeding for children younger than 5 years with moderate acute malnutrition leads to lower relapse rates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(4):544–9.
    1. Stobaugh HC, Bollinger LB, Adams SE, Crocker AH, Grise JB, Kennedy JA, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta KM, Dietzen DJ, Manary MJet al. . Effect of a package of health and nutrition services on sustained recovery in children after moderate acute malnutrition and factors related to sustaining recovery: a cluster-randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(2):657–66.
    1. Isanaka S, Barnhart DA, McDonald CM, Ackatia-Armah RS, Kupka R, Doumbia S, Brown KH, Menzies NA. Cost-effectiveness of community-based screening and treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Mali. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(2):1–10.
    1. Langloise B, Griswold SP, Cliffer I, Riffenburg K, Suri D, Sawi M, Webb P, Rogers BL. Use of specialized nutritious foods in a moderate acute malnutrition treatment program in Sierra Leone. UnderReview. 2021.
    1. Statistics Sierra Leone . Sierra Leone multiple indicator cluster survey 2017: Survey findings report. Freetown (Sierra Leone): Statistics Sierra Leone; 2018.
    1. Irish Aid, Action Against Hunger. Sierra Leone national nutrition survey: final report. Freetown (Sierra Leone): Action Against Hunger; 2017.
    1. Webb P, Rogers BL, Rosenberg I, Schlossman N, Wanke C, Bagriansky J, Sadler K, Johnson Q, Tilahun J, Reese Masterson Aet al. . Improving the nutritional quality of U.S. food aid: recommendations for changes to products and programs. Boston (MA): Tufts University; 2011.
    1. UNICEF . Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measuring tapes. New York (NY): UNICEF; 2009.
    1. Baltussen RMPM, Taghreed A, Tan-Torres Edejer T, Hutubessy RCW, Acharya A, Evans DB, Murray CJL. Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva (Switzerland): Springer Netherlands; 2003.
    1. World Bank . Inflation, GDP deflator (annual %). World Bank Database. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2019.
    1. Bank of Sierra Leone . Monthly exchange rates. Freetown (Sierra Leone): Bank of Sierra Leone; 2018.
    1. World Bank . Official exchange rate (LCU per US$, period average)–Sierra Leone (1990–2017). Washington (DC): World Bank; 2018.
    1. Lazzerini M, Rubert L, Pani P. Specially formulated foods for treating children with moderate acute malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(6):CD009584.
    1. Lenters LM, Wazny K, Webb P, Ahmed T, Bhutta ZA. Treatment of severe and moderate acute malnutrition in low-and middle-income settings: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi process. BMC Pub Health. 2013;13(Suppl 3):S23.
    1. Goudet S, Jayaraman A, Chanani S, Osrin D, Devleesschauwer B, Bogin B, Madise N, Griffiths P.. Cost effectiveness of a community based prevention and treatment of acute malnutrition programme in Mumbai slums, India. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):1–17.
    1. Puett C, Sadler K, Alderman H, Coates J, Fiedler JL, Myatt M. Cost-effectiveness of the community-based management of severe acute malnutrition by community health workers in southern Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(4):386–99.
    1. Isanaka S, Menzies NA, Sayyad J, Ayoola M, Grais RF, Doyon S. Cost analysis of the treatment of severe acute malnutrition in West Africa. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(4):e12398.
    1. Shen Y, Cliffer IR, Suri DJ, Langlois BK, Vosti SA, Webb P, Rogers BL. Impact of stakeholder perspectives on cost-effectiveness estimates of four specialized nutritious foods for preventing stunting and wasting in children 6–23 months in Burkina Faso. Nutr J. 2020;19(1):20.
    1. Nackers F, Broillet F, Oumarou D, Djibo A, Gaboulaud V, Guerin PJ, Rusch B, Grais RF, Captier V. Effectiveness of ready-to-use therapeutic food compared to a corn/soy-blend-based pre-mix for the treatment of childhood moderate acute malnutrition in Niger. J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56(6):407–13.
    1. Lelijveld N, Musyoki E, Adongo SW, Mayberry A, Wells JC, Opondo C, Kerac M, Bailey J. Relapse and post-discharge body composition of children treated for acute malnutrition using a simplified, combined protocol: a nested cohort from the ComPAS RCT. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0245477.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren