Early treatment of posterior crossbite--a randomised clinical trial

Carsten Lippold, Thomas Stamm, Ulrich Meyer, András Végh, Tatjana Moiseenko, Gholamreza Danesh, Carsten Lippold, Thomas Stamm, Ulrich Meyer, András Végh, Tatjana Moiseenko, Gholamreza Danesh

Abstract

Background: The aim of this randomised clinical trial was to assess the effect of early orthodontic treatment in contrast to normal growth effects for functional unilateral posterior crossbite in the late deciduous and early mixed dentition by means of three-dimensional digital model analysis.

Methods: This randomised clinical trial was assessed to analyse the orthodontic treatment effects for patients with functional unilateral posterior crossbite in the late deciduous and early mixed dentition using a two-step procedure: initial maxillary expansion followed by a U-bow activator therapy. In the treatment group 31 patients and in the control group 35 patients with a mean age of 7.3 years (SD 2.1) were monitored. The time between the initial assessment (T1) and the follow-up (T2) was one year. The orthodontic analysis was done by a three-dimensional digital model analysis. Using the 'Digimodel' software, the orthodontic measurements in the maxilla and mandible and for the midline deviation, the overjet and overbite were recorded.

Results: Significant differences between the control and the therapy group at T2 were detected for the anterior, median and posterior transversal dimensions of the maxilla, the palatal depth, the palatal base arch length, the maxillary arch length and inclination, the midline deviation, the overjet and the overbite.

Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment of a functional unilateral posterior crossbite with a bonded maxillary expansion device followed by U-bow activator therapy in the late deciduous and early mixed dentition is an effective therapeutic method, as evidenced by the results of this RCT. It leads to three-dimensional therapeutically induced maxillary growth effects. Dental occlusion is significantly improved, and the prognosis for normal craniofacial growth is enhanced.

Trial registration: Registration trial DRKS00003497 on DRKS.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Workflow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bonded maxillary expansion. Palatal expansion appliance used for slow expansion of the maxillary bones, bonded onto the posterior teeth.
Figure 3
Figure 3
U-bow activator. U-bow activator Type 1, as described by Karwetzky, used to achieve midline coordination and retain palatal expansion. (a) Outer view, (b) inner view.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Maxillary transversal measurements. For the analysis of the intercanine, anterior, middle and posterior transversal widths, all measurements were performed by projection on the occlusal plane. For the intercanine width, the canine cuspids, the first and second deciduous molars, and the six-year molars, the deepest points of the fossae were taken as reference points.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Maxillary arch length and inclination. The length of the perpendicular reference line between the tuber plane and the maxillary incisors was defined as the sagittal arch length. The angle that spans between the right and left connecting lines was defined as the arch inclination.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Transversal palatal base arch length. Based on the three-dimensional digital model mesh, the anterior, middle and posterior transversal palatal base arch lengths were measured. Reference points were the middle palatal dentogingival transitions of the right and left sides for both the first and second deciduous molars and, if present, for the first permanent molars.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Palatal depth. Palatal depth was measured for the first and second deciduous molars perpendicularly to the occlusal plane in the median raphe. Due to the reference point differences between T1 and T2 caused by possible vertical growth of the first permanent molars, no measurement was performed.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Mandibular transversal measurements. The mandibular intercanine distance was measured between the right and left canines. The mandibular anterior transversal width was defined as the distance between the approximal contact points of the mandibular first and second deciduous molars. For the middle and posterior transversal widths, the distance between the distobuccal cusps was registered.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Midline deviation. The midline deviation was measured in the frontal plane between the upper and lower midlines on the occlusal plane.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Overbite and overjet. The vertical overbite was measured between the edge of the uppermost vertically erupted middle incisor and the corresponding incisal edge of the opposite mandibular tooth perpendicular to the occlusal plane. The sagittal overjet was measured between the most anterior point of the maxillary central incisors and the corresponding reference point on the mandibular incisor.

References

    1. Allen D, Rebellato J, Sheats R, Ceron AM. Skeletal and dental contributions to posterior crossbites. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:515–524.
    1. Subtelny JD. Oral respiration: facial maldevelopment and corrective dentofacial orthopedics. Angle Orthod. 1980;50:147–164.
    1. McNamara JA Jr. Early intervention in the transverse dimension: is it worth the effort? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:572–574. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.124167.
    1. Hartsfield JK. In: Orthodontics. Current Principles and Techniques. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, editor. St. Louis: Elsevier publishers; 2006. Genetics and orthodontics; pp. 101–115.
    1. Lindner A, Modeer T. Relation between sucking habits and dental characteristics in preschool children with unilateral cross-bite. Scand J Dent Res. 1989;97:278–283.
    1. Thilander B, Lennartsson B. A study of children with unilateral posterior crossbite, treated and untreated, in the deciduous dentition-occlusal and skeletal characteristics of significance in predicting the long-term outcome. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63:371–383. doi: 10.1007/s00056-002-0210-6.
    1. Zhu JF, Crevoisier R, King DL, Henry R, Mills CM. Posterior crossbites in children. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17:1051–1054. 1056, 1058.
    1. Ogaard B, Larsson E, Lindsten R. The effect of sucking habits, cohort, sex, intercanine widths, and breast or bottle feeding on posterior crossbite in Norwegian and Swedish 3-year-old children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:161–166. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70034-6.
    1. Modeer T, Odenrick L, Lindner A. Sucking habits and their relation to posterior cross-bite in 4-year-old children. Scand J Dent Res. 1982;90:323–328.
    1. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res. 1973;81:12–21.
    1. Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:25–34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/6.1.25.
    1. Thilander B, Rubio G, Pena L, de Mayorga C. Prevalence of temporomandibular dysfunction and its association with malocclusion in children and adolescents: an epidemiologic study related to specified stages of dental development. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:146–154.
    1. Kutin G, Hawes RR. Posterior cross-bites in the deciduous and mixed dentitions. Am J Orthod. 1969;56:491–504. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90210-3.
    1. Heikinheimo K, Salmi K. Need for orthodontic intervention in five-year-old Finnish children. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1987;83:165–169.
    1. Ciuffolo F, Manzoli L, D’Attilio M, Tecco S, Muratore F, Festa F, Romano F. Prevalence and distribution by gender of occlusal characteristics in a sample of Italian secondary school students: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:601–606. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji043.
    1. Kurol J, Berglund L. Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of early treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:173–179. doi: 10.1093/ejo/14.3.173.
    1. Lippold C, Hoppe G, Moiseenko T, Ehmer U, Danesh G. Analysis of condylar differences in functional unilateral posterior crossbite during early treatment - a randomized clinical study. J Orofac Orthop. 2008;69:283–296. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0803-9.
    1. Pinto AS, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Chen P. Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:513–520. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.118627a.
    1. Harrison JE, Ashby D. Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;1:CD000979. .
    1. Kennedy DB, Osepchook M. Unilateral posterior crossbite with mandibular shift: a review. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71:569–573.
    1. Lam PH, Sadowsky C, Omerza F. Mandibular asymmetry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:569–575. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70282-9.
    1. Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE, Magnusson T, Thilander B. A longitudinal study on malocclusion in relation to signs and symptoms of cranio-mandibular disorders in children and adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:399–407. doi: 10.1093/ejo/12.4.399.
    1. Mohlin B, Thilander B. The importance of the relationship between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction and some clinical applications in adults. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:192–204.
    1. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Gornbein JA. A multiple logistic regression analysis of the risk and relative odds of temporomandibular disorders as a function of common occlusal features. J Dent Res. 1993;72:968–979. doi: 10.1177/00220345930720061301.
    1. Jr McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Herberger TA. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:344–353.
    1. Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Skeletal and dental changes with fixed slow maxillary expansion treatment: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:194–199.
    1. Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:1046–1052.
    1. Petrén S, Bondemark L. Correction of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:e7–e13.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–1194. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:2–7.
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance not choice. Lancet. 2002;359:515–519. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.
    1. Spillane LM, McNamara JA Jr. Maxillary adaptations following expansion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:176–187. doi: 10.1016/S1073-8746(95)80021-2.
    1. McNamara JA, Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor: Needham; 2001.
    1. Ehmer U. Der U-Bügelaktivator Typ 1 nach Karwetzky - Wirkungsprinzipien - Indikationsbereiche - Klinische Handhabung - Teil 1. Prakt Kieferorthop. 1993;7:233–240.
    1. Ehmer U. Der U-Bügelaktivator Typ 1 nach Karwetzky - Wirkungsprinzipien - Indikationsbereiche - Klinische Handhabung - Teil 2. Kieferorthop. 1994;8:11–22.
    1. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:165–170. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70242-7.
    1. Geran RG, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Shapiro LM. A prospective long-term study on the effects of rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:631–640. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.020.
    1. Petren S, Bondemark L. Correction of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:466–467.
    1. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:301–306.
    1. Primozic J, Ovsenik M, Richmond S, Kau CH, Zhurov A. Early crossbite correction: a three-dimensional evaluation. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:352–356. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp041.
    1. Lindner A. Longitudinal study of the effect of early interceptive treatment in 4-year-old children with unilateral cross-bite. Scand J Dent Res. 1989;97:432–438.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren