Concerning the timing of antibiotic administration in women undergoing caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Michael Heesen, Sven Klöhr, Rolf Rossaint, Karel Allegaert, Karel Allegeaert, Jan Deprest, Marc Van de Velde, Sebastian Straube, Michael Heesen, Sven Klöhr, Rolf Rossaint, Karel Allegaert, Karel Allegeaert, Jan Deprest, Marc Van de Velde, Sebastian Straube

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects on maternal infectious morbidity and neonatal outcomes of the timing of antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing caesarean section. A recent National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline reported that antibiotic administration before skin incision reduces the risk of maternal infection; this recommendation was based on a meta-analysis, however one including trials that were not double blind and not including a trial published recently.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: Searches of PubMed and EMBASE and reference lists of the retrieved articles.

Inclusion criteria: Randomised double-blind controlled trials comparing the administration of antibiotics before skin incision with administration after cord clamping.

Data extraction and analysis: Data on maternal total infectious morbidity, endometritis and wound infection, as well as neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal infection and neonatal sepsis were extracted and combined using random effects meta-analysis.

Results: Five studies reporting on 1777 parturients were included in our systematic review. The relative risk (RR) for maternal total infectious morbidity for antibiotic administration before incision compared with antibiotic administration after cord clamping was 0.64 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.15). Likewise, there was no difference in the risk of wound infection (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.27). Parturients receiving the antibiotic preoperatively had a significantly reduced risk of endometritis (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.87; number needed to treat 41, 95% CI 23 to 165). Analyses of the neonatal outcome parameters revealed no differences between the regimens of antibiotic administration, but were based on few studies.

Conclusions: In contrast to a recent NICE guideline, we did not find a reduction in total infectious morbidity with antibiotic administration before skin incision; we confirmed a reduction in the risk of endometritis and a lack of effect on the risk for wound infection.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of articles for inclusion in our systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maternal outcomes. (A) Total infectious morbidity, (B) endometritis and (C) wound infection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Neonatal outcomes. (A) Neonatal intensive care unit admission, (B) neonatal infection, (C) neonatal sepsis and (D) suspected neonatal sepsis.

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence CG132 Caesarean Section.
    1. Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011;118(Suppl 1):1–203
    1. Fiore Mitchell T, Pearlman MD, Chapman RL, et al. Maternal and transplacental pharmacokinetics of cefazolin. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1075–9
    1. Gordon HR, Phelps D, Blanchard K. Prophylactic cesarean section antibiotics: maternal and neonatal morbidity before or after cord clamping. Obstet Gynecol 1979;53:151–6
    1. Yildirim G, Gungorduk K, Guven HZ, et al. When should we perform prophylactic antibiotics in elective cesarean cases? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;280:13–18
    1. Witt A, Döner M, Petricevic L, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Surg 2011;146:1404–9
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12
    1. Wax JR, Hersey K, Philput C, et al. Single dose cefazolin prophylaxis for postcesarean infections: before vs. after cord clamping. J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6:61–5
    1. Thigpen BD, Hood WA, Chauhan S, et al. Timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration in the uninfected laboring gravida: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1864–8
    1. Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E, et al. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:455.e1–5
    1. Nokiani FA, Akbari H, Rezaei M. Timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration in term cesarean sections: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Clin Infect Dis 2009;42:71–6
    1. Kaimal AJ, Zlatnik MG, Cheng YW, et al. Effect of a change in policy regarding the timing of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of postcesarean delivery surgical-site infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:310.e1–5
    1. Owens SM, Brozanski BS, Meyn LA, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery before skin incision. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:573–9
    1. Fejgin MD, Markov S, Goshen S, et al. Antibiotic for cesarean section: the case for ‘true’ prophylaxis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993;43:257–61

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren