Influence of Sex on Relationship Between Total Anatomical and Physiologic Disease Burdens and Their Prognostic Implications in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Chee Hae Kim, Bon-Kwon Koo, Joo Myung Lee, Eun-Seok Shin, Jonghanne Park, Ki Hong Choi, Doyeon Hwang, Tae-Min Rhee, Jinlong Zhang, You-Jung Choi, Seo-Young Lee, Jin-Ho Choi, Joon-Hyung Doh, Chang-Wook Nam, Jianan Wang, Shaoliang Chen, Shoichi Kuramitsu, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hitoshi Matsuo, Takashi Akasaka, Chee Hae Kim, Bon-Kwon Koo, Joo Myung Lee, Eun-Seok Shin, Jonghanne Park, Ki Hong Choi, Doyeon Hwang, Tae-Min Rhee, Jinlong Zhang, You-Jung Choi, Seo-Young Lee, Jin-Ho Choi, Joon-Hyung Doh, Chang-Wook Nam, Jianan Wang, Shaoliang Chen, Shoichi Kuramitsu, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Hitoshi Matsuo, Takashi Akasaka

Abstract

Background Total atherosclerosis disease burden is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the influence of sex on the relationship between total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens and their prognostic implications have not been well defined. Methods and Results A total of 1136 patients who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement in all 3 major coronary arteries were included in this study. Anatomical and physiologic total disease burden was assessed by SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, residual SYNTAX score, a total sum of FFR in 3 vessels (3-vessel FFR), and functional SYNTAX score. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization at 2 years. There were no differences in angiographic diameter stenosis, SYNTAX score, or residual SYNTAX score between women and men. However, both per-vessel FFR (0.89±0.10 versus 0.87±0.11, P<0.001) and 3-vessel FFR (2.72±0.13 versus 2.69±0.15, P<0.001) were higher in women. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens were significantly associated with 2-year major adverse cardiac events, and there was no significant interaction between sex and total disease burden for clinical outcomes. Conclusions Despite similar angiographic disease severity, both per-vessel and per-patient physiologic disease severity was less in women than in men. There was no influence of sex on prognostic implications of total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens in patients with coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01621438.

Keywords: SYNTAX score; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; prognosis; sex; total disease burden.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of angiographic percentage diameter stenosis and per‐vessel FFR. The distributions of percentage diameter stenosis (A) and per‐vessel FFR (B) according to sex are presented. FFR indicates fractional flow reserve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between angiographic stenosis severity and FFR according to sex. A, This figure shows the values of FFR according to different angiographic stenosis severity in women and men. B, When the proportions of concordant normal, concordant abnormal, reverse mismatch, and mismatch were compared, mismatch was more frequent in women than in men. %DS indicates percentage diameter stenosis; FFR, fractional flow reserve.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distributions of SYNTAX Score (A), residual SYNTAX score (B), and 3‐vessel FFR (C) in women and men. There were no differences in SYNTAX score and residual SYNTAX score between women and men. However, 3‐vessel FFR was higher in women (2.72±0.13 vs 2.69±0.15, P<0.001). FFR indicates fractional flow reserve; SYNTAX, Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association between estimated 2‐year major adverse cardiac event rate and anatomical and physiologic disease burden. SYNTAX score (A), residual SYNTAX score (B), and 3‐vessel FFR (C) showed significant association with the estimated 2‐year MACE rates in both sexes. There was no significant interaction of sex in the relationship between total disease burden and clinical outcomes. FFR indicates fractional flow reserve; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; SYNTAX, Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery.

References

    1. Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, Achenbach S, Al‐Mallah M, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Callister TQ, Chang H‐J, Cheng V, Chinnaiyan K, Chow BJ, Delago A, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Kaufmann P, Maffei E, Raff G, Shaw LJ, Villines T, Berman DS; CONFIRM Investigators . Age‐and sex‐related differences in all‐cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings: results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:849–860.
    1. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW; PROSPECT Investigators . A prospective natural‐ history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–235.
    1. Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrøm SZ, Pedersen F, Galatius S, Madsen JK, Jørgensen E, Kelbæk H, Prescott E. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2011;33:734–744.
    1. Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Sarno G, van den Brand M, Kappetein A‐P, Van Dyck N, Mack M, Holmes D, Feldman T, Morice MC, Colombo A, Bass E, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, van Es GA, Morel MA, Mohr FW. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. EuroIntervention. 2009;5:50–56.
    1. Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Girasis C, de Vries T, Morel M‐A, van Es G‐A, Buszman P, Linke A, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Corti R, Eberli F, Wijns W, Morice MC, di Mario C, van Geuns RJ, Juni P, Windecker S, Serruys PW. Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all‐comers population of the randomized multicenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus Erodable Stent Coating) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:272–277.
    1. Généreux P, Palmerini T, Caixeta A, Rosner G, Green P, Dressler O, Xu K, Parise H, Mehran R, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2165–2174.
    1. Farooq V, Serruys PW, Bourantas CV, Zhang Y, Muramatsu T, Feldman T, Holmes DR, Mack M, Morice MC, Ståhle E, Colombo A, de Vries T, Morel MA, Dawkins KD, Kappetein AP, Mohr FW. Quantification of incomplete revascularization and its association with five‐year mortality in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial validation of the residual SYNTAX score. Circulation. 2013;128:141–151.
    1. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1995;92:2333–2342.
    1. Lee JM, Koo B‐K, Shin E‐S, Nam C‐W, Doh J‐H, Hwang D, Park J, Kim K‐J, Zhang J, Hu X, Wang J, Ahn C, Ye F, Chen S, Yang J, Chen J, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Matsuo H, Takashima H, Shiono Y, Akasaka T. Clinical implications of three‐vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;39:945–951.
    1. Park J, Lee JM, Koo BK, Shin ES, Nam CW, Doh JH, Hwang D, Zhang J, Hu X, Wang J, Ye F, Chen S, Yang J, Chen J, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Matsuo H, Takashima H, Shiono Y, Akasaka T. Clinical relevance of functionally insignificant moderate coronary artery stenosis assessed by 3‐vessel fractional flow reserve measurement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008055 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.00805
    1. Kim H‐S, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Yong AS, Tremmel JA, Pijls NH, Fearon WF; Investigators FS . The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:1037–1042.
    1. Kang S‐J, Ahn J‐M, Han S, Lee J‐Y, Kim W‐J, Park D‐W, Lee S‐W, Kim Y‐H, Lee CW, Park S‐W, Mintz GS, Park SJ. Sex differences in the visual‐functional mismatch between coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound versus fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:562–568.
    1. Choi KH, Lee JM, Koo B‐K, Nam C‐W, Shin E‐S, Doh J‐H, Rhee T‐M, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, Kim KJ, Hu X, Wang J, Ye F, Chen S, Yang J, Chen J, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Matsuo H, Takashima H, Shiono Y, Akasaka T. Prognostic implication of functional incomplete revascularization and residual functional SYNTAX score in patients with coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:237–245.
    1. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O'Gara P, Rubin GD, Kramer CM, Berman D, Brown A, Chaudhry FA, Cury RC, Desai MY, Einstein AJ, Gomes AS, Harrington R, Hoffmann U, Khare R, Lesser J, McGann C, Rosenberg A, Schwartz R, Shelton M, Smetana GW, Smith SC Jr. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1864–1894.
    1. Lee JM, Choi G, Koo B‐K, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, Kim K‐J, Tong Y, Kim HJ, Grady L. Identification of high‐risk plaques destined to cause acute coronary syndrome using coronary computed tomographic angiography and computational fluid dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018:2554 S1936‐878X(18)30134–S1936‐878X(18)30137.
    1. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short‐term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107:2900–2907.
    1. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech J‐W, van't Veer M, Bär F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5‐year follow‐up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–2111.
    1. Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, Mangiacapra F, Nelis O, De Vroey F, Di Serafino L, Muller O, Van Mieghem C, Wyffels E, Heyndrickx GR, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Barbato E, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2831–2838.
    1. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Heyndrickx GR, Hodeige D, Kirkeeide R, Gould KL. Pressure‐derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation. Circulation. 2000;101:1840–1847.
    1. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators . Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–224.
    1. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Möbius‐Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engström T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Jüni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators . Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.
    1. Authors/Task Force members , Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet J‐P, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–2619.
    1. Lee JM, Doh J‐H, Nam C‐W, Shin E‐S, Koo B‐K. Functional approach for coronary artery disease: filling the gap between evidence and practice. Korean Circ J. 2018;48:179–190.
    1. Crystal GJ, Klein LW. Fractional flow reserve: physiological basis, advantages and limitations, and potential gender differences. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11:209–219.
    1. Kim HY, Lim H‐S, Doh J‐H, Nam C‐W, Shin E‐S, Koo B‐K, Yoon M‐H, Tahk S‐J, Kang DK, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Lee SH, Kim EK, Kim SM, Choe Y, Choi JH. Physiological severity of coronary artery stenosis depends on the amount of myocardial mass subtended by the coronary artery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1548–1560.
    1. Ahmadi A, Stone GW, Leipsic J, Serruys PW, Shaw L, Hecht H, Wong G, Nørgaard BL, O'Gara PT, Chandrashekhar Y, Narula J. Association of coronary stenosis and plaque morphology with fractional flow reserve and outcomes. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:350–357.
    1. Merz AA, Cheng S. Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing. Heart. 2016;102:825–831.
    1. Kelsey SF, James M, Holubkov AL, Holubkov R, Cowley MJ, Detre KM. Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985–1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation. 1993;87:720–727.
    1. Chandrasekhar J, Baber U, Sartori S, Faggioni M, Aquino M, Kini A, Weintraub W, Rao S, Kapadia S, Weiss S, Strauss C, Toma C, Muhlestein B, DeFranco A, Effron M, Keller S, Baker B, Pocock S, Henry T, Mehran R. Sex‐related differences in outcomes among men and women under 55 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the PROMETHEUS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89:629–637.
    1. Udell JA, Koh M, Qiu F, Austin PC, Wijeysundera HC, Bagai A, Yan AT, Goodman SG, Tu JV, Ko DT. Outcomes of women and men with acute coronary syndrome treated with and without percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e004319 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004319.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren