Complete wound closure following a single topical application of a novel autologous homologous skin construct: first evaluation in an open-label, single-arm feasibility study in diabetic foot ulcers

David G Armstrong, Dennis P Orgill, Robert Galiano, Paul M Glat, Marissa Carter, Charles M Zelen, William W Li, David G Armstrong, Dennis P Orgill, Robert Galiano, Paul M Glat, Marissa Carter, Charles M Zelen, William W Li

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a growing burden on patients and health care systems that often require multiple treatments of both conventional and advanced modalities to achieve complete wound closure. A novel autologous homologous skin construct (AHSC) has been developed to treat cutaneous defects with a single topical application, by leveraging the endogenous repair capabilities of the patient's healthy skin. The AHSC's ability to close DFUs with a single treatment was evaluated in an open-label, single-arm feasibility study. Eleven patients with DFUs extending up to tendon, bone, or capsule received a single topical application of AHSC. Closure was documented weekly with high-resolution digital photography and wound planimetry. All 11 DFUs demonstrated successful graft take. Ten DFUs closed within 8 weeks. The median time-to-complete closure was 25 days. The mean percent area reduction for all 11 wounds at 4 weeks was 83%. There were no adverse events related to the AHSC treatment site. This pilot study demonstrated AHSC may be a viable single application topical intervention for DFUs and warrants investigation in larger, controlled studies.

Keywords: autologous homologous skin construct; diabetic foot ulcer; novel therapy; wound healing.

Conflict of interest statement

The Professional Education and Research Institute, for which Medical Director Charles Zelen DPM, received research support from PolarityTE to administer this study.

The Surgery Department for the University of Southern California has received research funds from PERI provided by PolarityTE for D.G.A. to serve as principal investigator and assist in completion of this study and is assisting in the completion of the DFU RCT. D.P.O. is a consultant for PERI and has received funds from PERI to assist in completion of this study and in the completion of the DFU RCT. P.M.G., PC for which P.M.G. is the Medical Director and owner has received research funds from PERI provided by PolarityTE to assist in completion of this study and is assisting in the completion of the DFU RCT. R.G. is a consultant for PERI and has received research funds from PERI provided by PolarityTE to assist in completion of this study and is assisting in the completion of the DFU RCT. M.C. is a consultant for PERI and has received funds from PERI to assist in completion of this study and perform the statistical analysis. The Professional Education and Research Institute (PERI), for which C.M.Z. is medical director and CEO has received research funds from PolarityTE to conduct this study and is assisting in the completion of the DFU RCT. LLC for which W.W.L. is the Medical Director and owner has received research funds from PERI provided by PolarityTE to assist in completion of this study, serve as medical monitor and is assisting in the completion of the DFU RCT.

© 2020 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Diagram of events during the harvest and application of autologous homologous skin construct (AHSC). A 2 × 1 cm piece of healthy tissue was harvested from the proximal calf of each patient in the office. This was shipped overnight to an FDA‐registeredbio‐manufacturing facility, where it was processed into AHSC. It was returned to the provider the following day. The AHSC was deployed on the debrided wound bed on the third day in the clinic. FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representative images of Patient No. 3, an 82‐year‐old man with diabetes, hypertension, neuropathy, gout, arthritis, and glaucoma, who presented with a 2 cm2 diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) on the left, plantar, medial, forefoot; Patient No. 4, a 56‐year‐old man with diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and neuropathy and a previous amputation of the hallux, who presented with a 3 cm2 DFU on the right, plantar, medial, forefoot; Patient No. 5, a 78‐year‐old woman with diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, depression, and venous leg ulcer, who presented with a 1 cm2 DFU on the first digit toe of the left foot; and Patient No. 7, a 48‐year‐old woman with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, and heart disease, who presented with a 22 cm2 DFU on the right, plantar, medial, heel
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan–Meier graph of the time to closure
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Images of Patient No. 6, a 53‐year‐old woman who was treated for a 5 cm2 left plantar lateral heel diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and was withdrawn from the study following an infection of the study foot of indwelling hardware from a prior Charcot foot reconstruction procedure. A, Pretreatment wound; B, ASHC applied; C, interim closure 13‐days following treatment; D, development of infected left lateral wound related to prior Charcot foot reconstruction requiring surgical intervention

References

    1. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367‐2375. 10.1056/nejmra1615439.
    1. Pendsey S. Diabetic Foot: A Clinical Atlas. London, UK: Martin Dunitz; 2004. Distributed in the USA by Fulfilment Center, Taylor & Francis.
    1. Ince P, Game FL, Jeffcoate WJ. Rate of healing of neuropathic ulcers of the foot in diabetes and its relationship to ulcer duration and ulcer area. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(3):660‐663.
    1. Gordon AJ, Alfonso AR, Nicholson J, Chiu ES. Evidence for healing diabetic foot ulcers with biologic skin substitutes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(4S suppl 1):S31‐S44.
    1. Halim AS, Khoo TL, Shah SJ. Biologic and synthetic skin substitutes: an overview. Indian J Plastic Surg. 2010;43:S23‐S28. . Accessed February 9, 2020.
    1. Davison‐Kotler E, Sharma V, Kang NV, García‐Gareta E. A universal classification system of skin substitutes inspired by factorial design. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2018;24:279‐288. 10.1089/ten.teb.2017.0477.
    1. Santema TB, Poyck PPC, Ubbink DT. Skin grafting and tissue replacement for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11‐17. 10.1002/14651858.CD011255.pub2.
    1. Ramanujam CL, Han D, Fowler S, Kilpadi K, Zgonis T. Impact of diabetes and comorbidities on split‐thickness skin grafts for foot wounds. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013;103(3):223‐232.
    1. Donegan RJ, Schmidt BM, Blume PA. An overview of factors maximizing successful split‐thickness skin grafting in diabetic wounds. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2014;5(1):24769. Accessed January 19, 2019.
    1. Ramanujam CL, Stapleton JJ, Kilpadi KL, Rodriguez RH, Jeffries LC, Zgonis T. Split‐thickness skin grafts for closure of diabetic foot and ankle wounds: a retrospective review of 83 patients. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010;3(5):231‐240. 10.1177/1938640010375114.
    1. Thourani VH, Ingram WL, Feliciano DV. Factors affecting success of split‐thickness skin grafts in the modern burn unit. J Trauma. 2003;54(3):562‐568.
    1. Reddy S, El‐Haddawi F, Fancourt M, et al. The incidence and risk factors for lower limb skin graft failure. Dermatol Res Pract. 2014;2014:582080. 10.1155/2014/582080.
    1. Donegan RJ, Schmidt BM, Blume PA. An overview of factors maximizing successful split‐thickness skin grafting in diabetic wound. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2014;5:1‐3.
    1. Granick MS, Baetz NW, Labroo P, Milner S, Li WW, Sopko NA. In vivo expansion and regeneration of full‐thickness functional skin with an autologous homologous skin construct: clinical proof of concept for chronic wound healing. Int Wound J. 2019;16:1‐6.
    1. Patterson CW, Stark M, Sharma S, Mundinger GS. Regeneration and expansion of autologous full‐thickness skin through a self‐propagating autologous skin graft technology. Clin Case Rep. 2019;7(12):2449‐2455. . Accessed January 4, 2020. 10.1002/ccr3.2533.
    1. Isbester K, Wee C, Boas S, Sopko N, Kumar A. Regeneration of autologous, functional, full thickness skin with minimal donor site contribution using autologous homologous skin construct. Plast Surg Case Stud. 2019:2‐3.
    1. Snippert HJ, Haegebarth A, Kasper M, et al. Lgr6 Marks stem cells in the hair follicle that generate all cell lineages of the skin. Science (80‐). 2010;327(5971):1385‐1389. . Accessed November 1, 2018. 10.1126/science.1184733.
    1. Harding KG, Morris HL, Patel GK. Science, medicine and the future: healing chronic wounds. BMJ. 2002;324(7330):160‐163. . Accessed December 14, 2018. 10.1136/bmj.324.7330.160.
    1. Martinson M, Martinson N. A comparative analysis of skin substitutes used in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. J Wound Care. 2016;25(suppl 10):S8‐S17. 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.sup10.s8.
    1. Januszyk M, Rennert R, Sorkin M, et al. Evaluating the effect of cell culture on gene expression in primary tissue samples using microfluidic‐based single cell transcriptional analysis. Microarrays. 2015;4(4):540‐550. 10.3390/microarrays4040540.
    1. Zelen CM, Serena TE, Gould L, et al. Treatment of chronic diabetic lower extremity ulcers with advanced therapies: a prospective, randomised, controlled, multi‐Centre comparative study examining clinical efficacy and cost. Int Wound J. 2015;13(2):272‐282. 10.1111/iwj.12566.
    1. Zelen CM, Orgill DP, Serena TE, et al. An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow‐up trial. Int Wound J. 2018;15(5):731‐739. . Accessed February 25, 2020. 10.1111/iwj.12920.
    1. Zelen CM, Orgill DP, Serena T, et al. A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2017;14(2):307‐315. . Accessed February 25, 2020. 10.1111/iwj.12600.
    1. Cazzell SM, Lange DL, Dickerson JE, Slade HB. The management of diabetic foot ulcers with porcine small intestine Submucosa tri‐layer matrix: a randomized controlled trial. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4(12):711‐718.
    1. Didomenico L, Landsman AR, Emch KJ, Landsman A. A prospective comparison of diabetic foot ulcers treated with either a cryopreserved skin allograft or a bioengineered skin substitute. Wounds. 2011;23(7):184‐189.
    1. Sanders L, Landsman AS, Landsman A, et al. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014;60:26‐38.
    1. Ananian CE, Dhillon YS, Van Gils CC, et al. A multicenter, randomized, single‐blind trial comparing the efficacy of viable cryopreserved placental membrane to human fibroblast‐derived dermal substitute for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2018;26(3):274‐283. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. DiDomenico LA, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, et al. Use of an aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion membrane improves likelihood and rate of healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, randomised, multi‐centre clinical trial in 80 patients. Int Wound J. 2018;15(6):950‐957. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. DiDomenico LA, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, et al. Aseptically processed placental membrane improves healing of diabetic foot ulcerations: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(10):2‐8. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001095.
    1. Lavery LA, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, et al. The efficacy and safety of Grafix® for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multi‐centre, controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial. Int Wound J. 2014;11(5):554‐560. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. Lavery L, Fulmer J, Shebetka KA, et al. Open‐label extension phase of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial using cryopreserved placental membrane. Wounds. 2018;30(9):275‐278.
    1. Snyder RJ, Shimozaki K, Tallis A, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled evaluation of the use of dehydrated amniotic membrane allograft compared to standard of Care for the Closure of chronic diabetic foot ulcer. Wounds. 2016;28(3):70‐77.
    1. Tettelbach W, Cazzell S, Reyzelman AM, Sigal F, Caporusso JM, Agnew PS. A confirmatory study on the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane dHACM allograft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled study of 110 patients from 14 wound clinics. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1):19‐29. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. Tettelbach W, Cazzell S, Sigal F, et al. A multicentre prospective randomised controlled comparative parallel study of dehydrated human umbilical cord (EpiCord) allograft for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1):122‐130. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. Zelen CM, Serena TE, Denoziere G, Fetterolf DE. A prospective randomised comparative parallel study of amniotic membrane wound graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2013;10(5):502‐507.
    1. Steinberg JS, Edmonds M, Hurley DP, King WN. Confirmatory data from EU study supports Apligraf for the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010;100(1):73‐77. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. You HJ, Han SK, Lee JW, Chang H. Treatment of diabetic foot ulcers using cultured allogeneic keratinocytes—a pilot study. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(4):491‐499. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. Campitiello F, Mancone M, Della Corte A, Guerniero R, Canonico S. To evaluate the efficacy of an acellular Flowable matrix in comparison with a wet dressing for the treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Updates Surg. 2017;69(4):523‐529. . Accessed February 25, 2020.
    1. Driver VR, Lavery LA, Reyzelman AM, et al. A clinical trial of Integra template for diabetic foot ulcer treatment. Wound Repair Regen. 2015;23(6):891‐900. . Accessed February 25, 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren