Psychometric Validation of the English and French Versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Andrea R Ashbaugh, Stephanie Houle-Johnson, Christophe Herbert, Wissam El-Hage, Alain Brunet, Andrea R Ashbaugh, Stephanie Houle-Johnson, Christophe Herbert, Wissam El-Hage, Alain Brunet
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of a French version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and to further validate the existing English version of the measure. Undergraduate students (n = 838 English, n = 262 French) completed the PCL-5 as well as other self-report symptom measures of PTSD and depression online. Both the English and French versions PCL-5 total scores demonstrated excellent internal consistency (English: α = .95; French: α = .94), and strong convergent and divergent validity. Strong internal consistency was also observed for each of the four subscales for each version (α's > .79). Test-retest reliability for the French version of the measure was also very good (r = .89). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four-factor DSM-5 model was not a good fit of the data. The seven-factor hybrid model best fit the data in each sample, but was only marginally superior to the six-factor anhedonia model. The French version of the PCL-5 demonstrated the same psychometric qualities as both the English version of the same measure and previous versions of the PCL. Thus clinicians serving French-speaking clients now have access to this highly used screening instrument. With regards to the structural validity of the PCL-5 and of the new PTSD diagnostic structure of the DSM-5, additional research is warranted. Replication of our results in clinical samples is much needed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM. The PTSD Checklist: Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. San Antonio (USA). 1993.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders Fifth Edition American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition—text revision Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
- King DW, Leskin GA, King LA, Weathers FW. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale: Evidence for the dimensionality of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Assess. 1998. June;10(2):90–6. 10.1037//1040-3590.10.2.90
- Palmieri PA, Weathers FW, Difede J, King DW. Confirmatory factor analysis of the PTSD Checklist and the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale in disaster workers exposed to the World Trade Center Ground Zero. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007. May;116(2):329–41. 10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.329
- Shelby RA, Golden-Kreutz DM, Andersen BL. Mismatch of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and DSM-IV symptom clusters in a cancer sample: Exploratory factor analysis of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version. J Trauma Stress. 2005. August 1;18(4):347–57. 10.1002/jts.20033
- Simms LJ, Watson D, Doebbeling BN. Confirmatory factor analyses of posttraumatic stress symptoms in deployed and non-deployed veterans of the Gulf War. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002. November;111(4):637–47. 10.1037//0021-843x.111.4.637
- Friedman MJ, Resick PA, Bryant RA, Brewin CR. Considering PTSD for DSM-5. Depress Anxiety. 2011. September 1;28(9):750–69. 10.1002/da.20767
- Weathers FW, Litz BT, Keane TM, Palmieri PA, Marx BP, Schnurr PP. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Scale available from the National Center for PTSD at . 2013.
- McDonald SD, Calhoun PS. The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010. December;30(8):976–87. 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012
- Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015. December;28(6):489–98. 10.1002/jts.22059
- Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, Forneris CA. Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther. 1996. August;34(8):669–73. 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00033-2
- Conybeare D, Behar E, Solomon A, Newman MG, Borkovec TD. The PTSD Checklist—Civilian Version: Reliability, validity, and factor structure in a nonclinical sample. J Clin Psychol. 2012. June 1;68(6):699–713. 10.1002/jclp.21845
- Liu P, Wang L, Cao C, Wang R, Zhang J, Zhang B, et al. The underlying dimensions of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in an epidemiological sample of Chinese earthquake survivors. J Anxiety Disord. 2014. May;28(4):345–51. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.03.008
- Armour C, Tsai J, Durham TA, Charak R, Biehn TL, Elhai JD, et al. Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid anhedonia and externalizing behaviors model. J Psychiatr Res. 2015. February;61:106–13. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012
- Ventureyra VAG, Yao S-N, Cottraux J, Note I, Mey-Guillard CD. The validation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist scale in posttraumatic stress disorder and nonclinical subjects. Psychother Psychosom. 2002. February;71(1):47–53. 10.1159/000049343
- Statistics Canada. French and the francophonie in Canada [Internet]. [Place unknown]: Statistics Canada; 2015 [cited April 22, 2016]. Available from: .
- Ryan C. Language use in the United States: 2011 [Internet]. [Place unknown] US Census Bureau; 2013 [cited April 22, 2016]. Available from: . 2013.
- French ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development [Internet]. The status of French in the world; 2016 [cited April 22, 2016]. Available from: .
- Yao SN, Cottraux J, Note I, De Mey-Guillard C, Mollard E, Ventureyra V. Evaluation of post-traumatic stress disorder: Validation of a measure, the PCLS. Enceph-Rev Psychiatr Clin Biol Ther. 2003. June;29(3):232–8.
- Ashbaugh AR, Herbert CF, Butler LD, Brunet A. A aew frontier: Trauma research on the internet. In: Ashbaugh AR, Herbert CF, Brunet A, editors. Internet use in the aftermath of trauma. c2010. p. 99–120.
- Gray MJ, Litz BT, Hsu JL, Lombardo TW. Psychometric properties of the Life Events Checklist. Assessment. 2004. December 1;11(4):330–41. 10.1177/1073191104269954
- Weiss DS. The Impact of Event Scale–Revised: Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD In: Wilson JP & Keane TM, editors Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; c2004. p. 168–89.
- Brunet A, St-Hilaire A, Jehel L, King S. Validation of a French version of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised. Can J Psychiatry Rev Can Psychiatr. 2003. February;48(1):56–61.
- Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401. 10.1177/014662167700100306
- Nezu AM, Ronan GF, Meadows EA, McClure KS, editors. Practitioner’s guide to empirically based measures of depression Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.
- Fuhrer R, Rouillon F. Description et traduction de l’échelle d’autoévaluation [The French version of CES-D: Description and translation of the self-report scale]. Psychiatr Psychobiol. 1989;4(3):163–6.
- IBM SPSS Statistics. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2012.
- Arbuckle, JL. AMOS. Chicago: IBM SPSS. 2014.
- Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999. January 1;6(1):1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
- Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Stat Med. 2012;31(29):3972–81. 10.1002/sim.5466
- Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling Guilford Press; 2011.
- Statistics Canada. Linguistic characteristics of canadians [Internet]. [Place unknown]: Statistics Canada, 2015 [cited 2016 Jun 30]. Available from:
- Bentler P. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990. March;107(2):238–46. 10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
- Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternate ways of assessing model fit In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; c1993. p. 136–62.
- MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996. June;1(2):130–49. 10.1037//1082-989x.1.2.130
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th edition Boston: Pearson; 2006.
- Bernat JA, Ronfeldt HM, Calhoun KS, Arias I. Prevalence of traumatic events and peritraumatic predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms in a nonclinical sample of college students. J Trauma Stress. 1998. October;11(4):645–64. 10.1023/A:1024485130934
- Frazier P, Anders S, Perera S, Tomich P, Tennen H, Park C, et al. Traumatic events among undergraduate students: Prevalence and associated symptoms. J Couns Psychol. 2009. July;56(3):450–60. 10.1037/a0016412
- Elhai JD, Miller ME, Ford JD, Biehn TL, Palmieri PA, Frueh BC. Posttraumatic stress disorder in DSM-5: Estimates of prevalence and symptom structure in a nonclinical sample of college students. J Anxiety Disord. 2012. January;26(1):58–64. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.013
- Weathers FW, Blake DD, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, Marx BP, Keane TM. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Interview available from the National Center for PTSD at ; 2013.
- Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research Guilford Press; 2006.
- Elhai JD, Palmieri PA. The factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: A literature update, critique of methodology, and agenda for future research. J Anxiety Disord. 2011. August;25(6):849–54. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.04.007
- Zelazny K, Simms LJ. Confirmatory factor analyses of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in psychiatric samples differing in Criterion A status. J Anxiety Disord. 2015. August;34:15–23. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.009
Source: PubMed