Group treatments for sensitive health care problems: a randomised controlled trial of group versus individual physiotherapy sessions for female urinary incontinence

S E Lamb, J Pepper, R Lall, E C Jørstad-Stein, M D Clark, L Hill, J Fereday-Smith, S E Lamb, J Pepper, R Lall, E C Jørstad-Stein, M D Clark, L Hill, J Fereday-Smith

Abstract

Background: The aim was to compare effectiveness of group versus individual sessions of physiotherapy in terms of symptoms, quality of life, and costs, and to investigate the effect of patient preference on uptake and outcome of treatment.

Methods: A pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trial in five British National Health Service physiotherapy departments. 174 women with stress and/or urge incontinence were randomised to receive treatment from a physiotherapist delivered in a group or individual setting over three weekly sessions. Outcome were measured as Symptom Severity Index; Incontinence-related Quality of Life questionnaire; National Health Service costs, and out of pocket expenses.

Results: The majority of women expressed no preference (55%) or preference for individual treatment (36%). Treatment attendance was good, with similar attendance with both service delivery models. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in symptom severity or quality of life outcomes between the models. Over 85% of women reported a subjective benefit of treatment, with a slightly higher rating in the individual compared with the group setting. When all health care costs were considered, average cost per patient was lower for group sessions (Mean cost difference 52.91 pounds 95%, confidence interval ( 25.82 pounds- 80.00 pounds)).

Conclusion: Indications are that whilst some women may have an initial preference for individual treatment, there are no substantial differences in the symptom, quality of life outcomes or non-attendance. Because of the significant difference in mean cost, group treatment is recommended.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN 16772662.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of women randomised who attended 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and > 5 sessions by assignment.

References

    1. Glew J. Continence. A woman's lot? Nursing Times. 1986;82:69–71.
    1. Ashworth PD, Hagan MT. The meaning of incontinence: a qualitative study of non-geriatric urinary incontinence sufferers. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1993;18:1415–1423. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18091415.x.
    1. Hannestad Y, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence. The Norwegian EPINCONT study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53:1150–1157. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00232-8.
    1. Fenner D. Incontinence. In: Scott JRGR, Karlan BY, Haney AF, editor. Danforth's Obstetrics & Gynecology. 9. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2003.
    1. Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY. The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2001;184:1496–1501. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114868. discussion 1501-1493.
    1. Berghmans LC, Hendriks HJ, De Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES, Bo K, van Kerrebroeck PE. Conservative treatment of urge urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. BJU International. 2000;85:254–263. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00434.x.
    1. Fantl JA, Wyman JF, McClish DK, Harkins SW, Elswick RK, Taylor JR, Hadley EC. Efficacy of bladder training in older women with urinary incontinence. JAMA. 1991;265:609–613. doi: 10.1001/jama.265.5.609.
    1. Wallace SA, Roe B, Williams K, Palmer M. Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults. [see comment] [update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001308 PMID: 10796768] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004. p. CD001308.
    1. Cook T. Group treatment of female urinary incontinence: literature review. Physiotherapy. 2001;87:226–234. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60783-3.
    1. Janssen CC, Lagro-Janssen AL, Felling AJ. The effects of physiotherapy for female urinary incontinence: individual compared with group treatment. BJU International. 2001;87:201–206. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02040.x.
    1. Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C. Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 1996;15:630–640. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1996)15:6<630::AID-NAU4>;2-G.
    1. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourology & Urodynamics. 1995;14:131–139. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930140206.
    1. Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A. Sample size tables for clinical studies Oxford edition. 2. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1997.
    1. Schafer J. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariata Data. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
    1. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis with Missing data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
    1. Netten A, Curtin L. Unit cost of Health and Social Care. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury; 2005.
    1. Burgio KL, Goode PS, Locher JL, Umlauf MG, Roth DL, Richter HE, Varner RE, Lloyd LK. Behavioral training with and without biofeedback in the treatment of urge incontinence in older women: a randomized controlled trial. [see comment] JAMA. 2002;288:2293–2299. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2293.
    1. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Locher JL, Roth DL, Umlauf MG, Richter HE, Varner RE, Lloyd LK. Effect of behavioral training with or without pelvic floor electrical stimulation on stress incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial. [see comment] JAMA. 2003;290:345–352. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.3.345.
    1. Holroyd-Leduc JM, Straus SE. Management of urinary incontinence in women: clinical applications. JAMA. 2004;291:996–999. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.996.
    1. Bo K, Talseth T, Holme I. Single blind, randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones, and no treatment in management of genuine stress incontinence in women. BMJ. 1999;318:487–493.
    1. Roe B, Doll H, Wilson K. Help seeking behaviour and health and social services utilisation by people suffering from urinary incontinence. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 1999;36:245–253. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(99)00020-6.
    1. Hay-Smith EJC, Dumoulin C. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006. p. CD005654.
    1. Dowell CJ, Bryant CM, Moore KH, Simons AM. Calculating the direct costs of urinary incontinence: a new test instrument. BJU International. 1999;83:596–606. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00993.x.
    1. Brink M van den, Hout WB van den, Stiggelbout AM, Putter H, Velde CJH van de, Kievit J. Self-reports of health-care utilization: diary or questionnaire? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2005;21:298–304.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren