Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review

Alan T N Tita, Dwight J Rouse, Sean Blackwell, George R Saade, Catherine Y Spong, William W Andrews, Alan T N Tita, Dwight J Rouse, Sean Blackwell, George R Saade, Catherine Y Spong, William W Andrews

Abstract

Objective: To review the current status of antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery, emerging strategies to enhance the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing postcesarean infection, and the implications of the emerging practices.

Data sources: We conducted a full PubMed (January 1966 to July 2008) search using the key words "cesarean" and "antibiotic prophylaxis." A total of 277 articles were identified and supplemented by a bibliographic search.

Methods of study selection: We selected a total of 15 studies, which included all published clinical trials, meta-analyses of clinical trials, and observational studies evaluating either the timing of antibiotics or the use of extended-spectrum prophylaxis. We also reviewed nine reports involving national recommendations or technical reviews supporting current standards for antibiotic prophylaxis.

Tabulation, integration, and results: We conducted an analytic review and tabulation of selected studies without further meta-analysis. Although current guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis recommend the administration of narrow-spectrum antibiotics (cefazolin) after clamping of the umbilical cord, the data suggest that antibiotic administration before surgical incision or the use of extended-spectrum regimens (involving azithromycin or metronidazole) after cord clamp may reduce postcesarean maternal infection by up to 50%. However, these two strategies have not been compared with each other. In addition, their effect on neonatal infection or infection with resistant organisms warrants further study.

Conclusion: The use of either cefazolin alone before surgical incision or an extended-spectrum regimen after cord clamp seems to be associated with a reduction in postcesarean maternal infection. Confirmatory studies focusing additionally on neonatal outcomes and the effect on resistant organisms, as well as studies comparing both strategies, are needed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in total cesarean delivery rate, US 1996–2006. Data from Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, Munson ML. Births: Final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56:1–103, and Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;56:1–18. {AQ: Figure 1 redrawn by editorial office. Please review and indicate approval.}
Figure 2
Figure 2
Annual incidence of post-cesarean endometritis for three time periods, categorized according to type of prophylactic antibiotics at University of Alabama at Birmingham. The line is the moving average trend line for successive years within each period of antibiotic prophylaxis. Andrews WW, Hauth JC, Cliver SP, Savage K, Goldenberg RL. Randomized clinical trial of extended spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis with coverage for Ureaplasma urealyticum to reduce post-cesarean delivery endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1183–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren