Hemodynamic dysfunction in obesity hypoventilation syndrome and the effects of treatment with surgically induced weight loss

H J Sugerman, P L Baron, R P Fairman, C R Evans, G W Vetrovec, H J Sugerman, P L Baron, R P Fairman, C R Evans, G W Vetrovec

Abstract

Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), defined as a PaO2 less than or equal to 55 mmHg and/or PaCo2 greater than or equal to 47 mmHg, was found in approximately 8% of morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric surgery for morbid obesity and was frequently associated with clinically significant pulmonary hypertension and cardiac dysfunction. Forty-six morbidly obese patients, 26 with and 20 without OHS, underwent preoperative pulmonary artery catheterization. Although the two groups had similar values for percent ideal body weight, blood pressure, and cardiac index, the OHS patients had significantly higher mean pulmonary artery pressures (PAP), p less than 0.0001, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures (PAOP), p less than 0.01. Eighteen OHS patients were restudied 3-9 months after gastric surgery. PaO2 increased from 50 +/- 10 to 69 +/- 14 mmHg, p less than 0.0001, and PaCO2 decreased from 52 +/- 7 to 42 +/- 4 mmHg, p less than 0.0001), after the loss of 42 +/- 19% excess weight. These changes were associated with significant decreases in PAP (from 36 +/- 14 to 23 +/- 7 mmHg, p less than 0.0001) and PAOP (from 17 +/- 7 to 12 +/- 6 mmHg, p less than 0.01). Significant correlations were noted between PAP and PAOP (r = +0.8, p less than 0.0001) and PAP and PaO2 (r = -0.6, p less than 0.0001). Both left ventricular dysfunction, defined as a PAOP greater than or equal to 18 mmHg, as well as pulmonary artery vasoconstriction, defined as PAEDP greater than 5 mmHg above PAOP, contributed to pulmonary hypertension in OHS patients. In conclusion, weight loss after gastric surgery for morbid obesity significantly improved arterial blood gases and hemodynamic function in OHS patients.

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1969 May 22;280(21):1165-6
    1. Ann Surg. 1982 Oct;196(4):389-99
    1. Ann Surg. 1981 Jun;193(6):677-85
    1. Lancet. 1981 Apr 18;1(8225):862-5
    1. N Engl J Med. 1983 Apr 28;308(17):995-9
    1. Acta Med Scand. 1979;205(5):367-73
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1978 Oct;89(4):454-8
    1. Ann Surg. 1987 Jun;205(6):613-24
    1. J Clin Invest. 1968 Dec;47(12):2652-6
    1. Ann Surg. 1979 Sep;190(3):392-400
    1. Am J Med. 1976 May 10;60(5):645-53
    1. JAMA. 1980 Feb 1;243(5):443-5
    1. Ann Surg. 1984 Jan;199(1):112-5
    1. J Clin Invest. 1955 Oct;34(10):1537-45
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Mar;98(3):315-9
    1. Am J Med. 1956 Nov;21(5):819-24
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1971 Jan;74(1):44-6
    1. Anesth Analg. 1976 Jan-Feb;55(1):37-41
    1. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985 Mar-Apr;27(5):325-34
    1. Arch Surg. 1982 May;117(5):701-6
    1. Circulation. 1981 Sep;64(3):477-82
    1. Circulation. 1957 Aug;16(2):179-87
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979 Dec;32(12 Suppl):2723-33
    1. Arch Surg. 1982 May;117(5):695-700
    1. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1970 May;126(5):279-95
    1. Surgery. 1978 Feb;83(2):230-4
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1979 Dec;59(6):1113-20
    1. N Engl J Med. 1957 Dec 19;257(25):1227-30
    1. Surgery. 1985 May;97(5):535-8
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(8):563-76
    1. J Clin Invest. 1962 Apr;41:725-42
    1. Am J Med. 1974 Sep;57(3):402-20
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980 Feb;33(2 Suppl):364-9
    1. Clin Chest Med. 1980 Jan;1(1):103-18
    1. Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Feb;153(2):113-7
    1. Chest. 1986 Jul;90(1):81-6
    1. Chest. 1987 Sep;92(3):393-9
    1. Ann Surg. 1979 May;189(5):560-5
    1. Am J Surg. 1984 Sep;148(3):331-6
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Mar 1;55(6):783-6
    1. Am J Med. 1956 Nov;21(5):811-8

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren