Multimodal Neuroimaging Approach to Variability of Functional Connectivity in Disorders of Consciousness: A PET/MRI Pilot Study

Carlo Cavaliere, Sivayini Kandeepan, Marco Aiello, Demetrius Ribeiro de Paula, Rocco Marchitelli, Salvatore Fiorenza, Mario Orsini, Luigi Trojano, Orsola Masotta, Keith St Lawrence, Vincenzo Loreto, Blaine Alexander Chronik, Emanuele Nicolai, Andrea Soddu, Anna Estraneo, Carlo Cavaliere, Sivayini Kandeepan, Marco Aiello, Demetrius Ribeiro de Paula, Rocco Marchitelli, Salvatore Fiorenza, Mario Orsini, Luigi Trojano, Orsola Masotta, Keith St Lawrence, Vincenzo Loreto, Blaine Alexander Chronik, Emanuele Nicolai, Andrea Soddu, Anna Estraneo

Abstract

Behavioral assessments could not suffice to provide accurate diagnostic information in individuals with disorders of consciousness (DoC). Multimodal neuroimaging markers have been developed to support clinical assessments of these patients. Here we present findings obtained by hybrid fludeoxyglucose (FDG-)PET/MR imaging in three severely brain-injured patients, one in an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), one in a minimally conscious state (MCS), and one patient emerged from MCS (EMCS). Repeated behavioral assessment by means of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and neurophysiological evaluation were performed in the two weeks before and after neuroimaging acquisition, to ascertain that clinical diagnosis was stable. The three patients underwent one imaging session, during which two resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) blocks were run with a temporal gap of about 30 min. rs-fMRI data were analyzed with a graph theory approach applied to nine independent networks. We also analyzed the benefits of concatenating the two acquisitions for each patient or to select for each network the graph strength map with a higher ratio of fitness. Finally, as for clinical assessment, we considered the best functional connectivity pattern for each network and correlated graph strength maps to FDG uptake. Functional connectivity analysis showed several differences between the two rs-fMRI acquisitions, affecting in a different way each network and with a different variability for the three patients, as assessed by ratio of fitness. Moreover, combined PET/fMRI analysis demonstrated a higher functional/metabolic correlation for patients in EMCS and MCS compared to UWS. In conclusion, we observed for the first time, through a test-retest approach, a variability in the appearance and temporal/spatial patterns of resting-state networks in severely brain-injured patients, proposing a new method to select the most informative connectivity pattern.

Keywords: PET/MRI; brain connectivity; diagnosis; glucose metabolism; graph theory; minimally conscious state; resting-state fMRI; unresponsive wakefulness syndrome.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient selection in each step of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised total score and neurophysiological (EEG and evoked related potential) evaluations recorded in the 3rd and 5th day before PET/fMRI exam and in the 7th and 9th day after the PET/fMRI exam. The green arrow marks the day of neuroimaging acquisition. The blue diamond and line denote the patient in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). The orange square and line denote the patient in minimally conscious state (MCS). The gray triangle and line denote the patient emerged from MCS (EMCS). CRS-R, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised; P, presence of P300 on evoked related potential; A, absence of P300 on evoked related potential; +, presence of EEG reactivity to eye opening and closing; –, absence of EEG reactivity to eye opening and closing; MiA, mildly abnormal EEG background activity; MoA, moderately abnormal EEG background activity; DS, Diffuse slowing EEG background activity; LV, Low voltage EEG background activity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A visual representation of the regions highlighted by the thresholded GS (values greater than half of the maximum GS value for the network), separated by the regions within and outside the network for patients in EMCS, MCS and UWS for nine RSNs. Regions belonging to the network and having GS values greater than the thresholded GS are represented by green, regions which should be in the network but do not have GS values greater than the thresholded GS are represented by blue, regions outside the network but have GS values greater than the thresholded GS are represented by red color. NN represents non-neuronal networks. Here the size of the circle doesn't represent the value of the GS, all the regions with a GS value are plotted evenly.

References

    1. Bernat JL. Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet (2006) 367:1181–92. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68508-5
    1. Sattin D, De Torres L, Dolce G, Arcuri F, Estraneo A, Cardinale V, et al. Analysis of Italian regulations on pathways of care for patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Funct Neurol. (2017) 32:159 10.11138/FNeur/2017.32.3.159
    1. Moretta P, Estraneo A, De Lucia L, Cardinale V, Loreto V, Trojano L. A study of the psychological distress in family caregivers of patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness during in-hospital rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. (2014) 28:717–25. 10.1177/0269215514521826
    1. Moretta P, Masotta O, Crispino E, Castronovo G, Ruvolo S, Montalbano C, et al. . Psychological distress is associated with altered cognitive functioning in family caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj. (2017) 31:1088–93. 10.1080/02699052.2017.1290278
    1. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. N Engl J Med. (1994) 330:1499–508. 10.1056/NEJM199405263302107
    1. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, et al. . The minimally conscious state definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology (2002) 58:349–53. 10.1212/WNL.58.3.349
    1. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Santoro L, Trojano L. Clinical and neuropsychological long-term outcomes after late recovery of responsiveness: a case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2014) 95:711–6. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.004
    1. Estraneo A, Trojano L. Prognosis in Disorders of Consciousness. In: Schnakers C, Laureys S, Editors. Coma and Disorders of Consciousness. Cham: Springer; (2018). pp. 17–36.
    1. Schnakers C, Monti MM. Disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: therapeutic options. Curr Opin Neurol. (2017) 30:573–9. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000495
    1. Estraneo A, Pascarella A, Moretta P, Masotta O, Fiorenza S, Chirico G, et al. . Repeated transcranial direct current stimulation in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a double-blind cross-over study. J Neurol Sci. (2017) 375:464–470. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.02.036
    1. Cavaliere C, Aiello M, Di Perri C, Amico E, Martial C, Thibaut A, et al. . Functional connectivity substrates for tDCS response in minimally conscious state patients. Front Cell Neurosci. (2016) 10:257. 10.3389/fncel.2016.00257
    1. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurology (2009) 9:35. 10.1186/1471-2377-9-35
    1. Cortese MD, Riganello F, Arcuri F, Pugliese ME, Lucca LF, Dolce G, et al. . Coma recovery scale-r: variability in the disorder of consciousness. BMC Neurol. (2015) 15:186. 10.1186/s12883-015-0455-5
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2004) 85:2020–9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033
    1. Wannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Laureys S. (2017). The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol.J. 81:883–9. 10.1002/ana.24962
    1. Majerus S, Gill-Thwaites H, Andrews K, Laureys S. Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage. Prog Brain Res. (2005) 150:397–413. 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50028-1
    1. Cavaliere C, Aiello M, Di Perri C, Fernandez-Espejo D, Owen AM, Soddu A. Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter abnormalities in patients with disorders of consciousness. Front Hum Neurosci. (2015) 8:1028. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01028
    1. Schiff ND. Multimodal neuroimaging approaches to disorders of consciousness. J Head Trauma Rehabil. (2006) 21:388–97. 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00003
    1. Bruno MA, Majerus S, Boly M, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Schnakers C, Gosseries O, et al. . Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol. (2012) 259:1087–98. 10.1007/s00415-011-6303-7
    1. Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM, Robson T, Ali A, Owen AM, et al. . Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain (2009) 132:2541–52. 10.1093/brain/awp183
    1. Soddu A, Gómez F, Heine L, Di Perri C, Bahri MA, Voss HU, et al. . Correlation between resting state fMRI total neuronal activity and PET metabolism in healthy controls and patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Behav. (2016) 6: e00424. 10.1002/brb3.424
    1. Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, Charland-Verville V, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, et al. . Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet (2014) 384:514–22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60042-8
    1. Aiello M, Cavaliere C, Salvatore M. Hybrid PET/MR imaging and brain connectivity. Front Neurosci. (2016) 10:64. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00064
    1. Estraneo A, Moretta P, De AT, Gatta G, Giacino JT, Trojano L. An Italian multicentre validation study of the coma recovery scale-revised. Eur J PhysRehabil Med. (2015) 51:627–34.
    1. Estraneo A, Loreto V, Guarino I, Boemia V, Paone G, Moretta P, et al. . Standard EEG in diagnostic process of prolonged disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol. (2016) 127:2379–85. 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.03.021
    1. Duncan CC, Barry RJ, Connolly JF, Fischer C, Michie PT, Näätänen R, et al. . Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol. (2009) 120:1883–908. 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.04
    1. Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B, Ladebeck R, Ganter C, Nekolla SG, et al. . (2011). Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med. 52:1914–22. 10.2967/jnumed.111.092726
    1. Berker Y, Franke J, Salomon A, Palmowski M, Donker HC, Temur Y, et al. . MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: a 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/Dixon MRI sequence. J Nucl Med. (2012) 53:796–804. 10.2967/jnumed.111.092577
    1. Ribeiro de Paula D, Ziegler E, Abeyasinghe PM, Das TK, Cavaliere C, Aiello M, et al. . A method for independent component graph analysis of resting-state fMRI. Brain Behav. (2017) 7:e00626. 10.1002/brb3.626
    1. Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R SocLond B Biol Sci. (2005) 360:1001–13. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1634
    1. Demertzi A, Gomez F, Crone JS, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Tshibanda L, Noirhomme Q, et al. . Multiple fMRI system-level baseline connectivity is disrupted in patients with consciousness alterations. Cortex (2014) 52:35–46. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.11.005
    1. Soddu A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bahri M, Bruno MA, Boly M, Demertzi A, et al. Identifying the default mode component in spatial IC analysis of patients with disorders of consciousness. Hum Brain Mapp. (2012) 33:778–96. 10.1002/hbm.21249
    1. Maudoux A, Lefebvre P, Demertzi A, Cabay JE, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Laureys S, et al. Connectivity graph analysis of the auditory resting state network in tinnitus. Brain Res. (2012) 16:10–21. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.006
    1. Gerhard S, Daducci A, Lemkaddem A, Meuli R, Thiran JP, Hagmann P. The connectome viewer toolkit: an open source framework to manage, analyze, and visualize connectomes. Front Neuroinform. (2011) 6:3 10.3389/fninf.2011.00003
    1. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Makris N, Rosen B, Dale AM, et al. . (2002) Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33:341–55. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00569-X
    1. Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2003) 100:253–8. 10.1073/pnas.0135058100
    1. Bonhomme V, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, Bruno MA, Jaquet O, Bahri MA, et al. . Resting-state network-specific breakdown of functional connectivity during ketamine alteration of consciousness in volunteers. Anesthesiology (2016) 125:873–88. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001275
    1. Guldenmund P, Gantner IS, Baquero K, Das T, Demertzi A, Boveroux P, et al. . Propofol-induced frontal cortex disconnection: a study of resting-state networks, total brain connectivity, and mean BOLD signal oscillation frequencies. Brain Connect. (2016) 6:225–37. 10.1089/brain.2015.0369
    1. Demertzi A, Antonopoulos G, Heine L, Voss HU, Crone JS, de Los Angeles C, et al. . Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain (2015) 138:2619–31. 10.1093/brain/awv169
    1. Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJF, Bruno MA, Boveroux P, Schnakers C, et al. . Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain (2009) 133:161–71. 10.1093/brain/awp313
    1. Persson J, Pudas S, Nilsson LG, Nyberg L. Longitudinal assessment of default-mode brain function in aging. Neurobiolaging (2014) 35:2107–17. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.012
    1. Jovicich J, Minati L, Marizzoni M, Marchitelli R, Sala-Llonch R, Bartrés-Faz D, et al. . Longitudinal reproducibility of default-mode network connectivity in healthy elderly participants: a multicentric resting-state fMRI study. Neuroimage (2016) 124:442–54. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.010
    1. Termenon M, Jaillard A, Delon-Martin C, Achard S. Reliability of graph analysis of resting state fMRI using test-retest dataset from the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage (2016) 142:172–87. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.062
    1. Di Perri C, Amico E, Heine L, Annen J, Martial C, Larroque SK, et al. . Multifaceted brain networks reconfiguration in disorders of consciousness uncovered by co-activation patterns. Hum Brain Mapp. (2018) 39:89–103. 10.1002/hbm.23826
    1. Piarulli A, Bergamasco M, Thibaut A, Cologan V, Gosseries O, Laureys S. EEG ultradian rhythmicity differences in disorders of consciousness during wakefulness. J Neurol. (2016) 263:1746–60. 10.1007/s00415-016-8196-y
    1. Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science (2006) 313:1402–1402. 10.1126/science.1130197
    1. Owen AM, Coleman MR. Functional neuroimaging of the vegetative state. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2008) 9:235. 10.1038/nrn2330
    1. Owen AM, Coleman MR. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2008) 1129:130–8. 10.1196/annals.1417.018
    1. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Lanzillo L, Santoro L, Trojano L. Late recovery of responsiveness and consciousness after traumatic, anoxic or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology (2010) 75:239–45. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8cc
    1. Steppacher I, Kaps M, Kissler J. Will time heal? A long-term follow-up of severe disorders of consciousness. Ann ClinTransl Neurol. (2014) 1:401–8. 10.1002/acn3.63
    1. Tagliazucchi E, Laufs H. Decoding wakefulness levels from typical fMRI resting-state data reveals reliable drifts between wakefulness and sleep. Neuron (2014) 7: 695–708. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.020
    1. Aiello M, Salvatore E, Cachia A, Pappatà S, Cavaliere C, Prinster A, et al. . Relationship between simultaneously acquired resting-state regional cerebral glucose metabolism and functional MRI: A PET/MR hybrid scanner study. Neuroimage (2015) 113:111–21. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.017
    1. Marchitelli R, Aiello M, Cachia A, Quarantelli M, Cavaliere C, Postiglione A, et al. . Simultaneous resting-state FDG-PET/fMRI in Alzheimer Disease: relationship between glucose metabolism and intrinsic activity. NeuroImage (2018) 176:246–58. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.048

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren