Effects of peripheral cooling on intention tremor in multiple sclerosis

P Feys, W Helsen, X Liu, D Mooren, H Albrecht, B Nuttin, P Ketelaer, P Feys, W Helsen, X Liu, D Mooren, H Albrecht, B Nuttin, P Ketelaer

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of peripheral sustained cooling on intention tremor in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MS induced upper limb intention tremor affects many functional activities and is extremely difficult to treat.Materials/

Methods: Deep (18 degrees C) and moderate (25 degrees C) cooling interventions were applied for 15 minutes to 23 and 11 tremor arms of patients with MS, respectively. Deep and moderate cooling reduced skin temperature at the elbow by 13.5 degrees C and 7 degrees C, respectively. Evaluations of physiological variables, the finger tapping test, and a wrist step tracking task were performed before and up to 30 minutes after cooling.

Results: The heart rate and the central body temperature remained unchanged throughout. Both cooling interventions reduced overall tremor amplitude and frequency proportional to cooling intensity. Tremor reduction persisted during the 30 minute post cooling evaluation period. Nerve conduction velocity was decreased after deep cooling, but this does not fully explain the reduction in tremor amplitude or the effects of moderate cooling. Cooling did not substantially hamper voluntary movement control required for accurate performance of the step tracking task. However, changes in the mechanical properties of muscles may have contributed to the tremor amplitude reduction.

Conclusions: Cooling induced tremor reduction is probably caused by a combination of decreased nerve conduction velocity, changed muscle properties, and reduced muscle spindle activity. Tremor reduction is thought to relate to decreased long loop stretch reflexes, because muscle spindle discharge is temperature dependent. These findings are clinically important because applying peripheral cooling might enable patients to perform functional activities more efficiently.

References

    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;71 Suppl 2:ii22-7
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;84(1):79-82
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jan;84(1):131-5
    1. Mult Scler. 2003 Feb;9(1):44-54
    1. Mult Scler. 2003 Oct;9(5):492-502
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1977 Sep;40(5):1214-24
    1. Pflugers Arch. 1978 May 18;374(2):159-66
    1. Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227-31
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Sep;64(9):412-6
    1. Exp Neurol. 1984 May;84(2):314-25
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1986 Jul;56(1):123-36
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Jan;50(1):71-7
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Aug;68(8):490-3
    1. J Physiol. 1987 Sep;390:383-95
    1. Am J Physiol. 1990 Aug;259(2 Pt 2):R197-203
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Sep;71(10):745-8
    1. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Mar;33(2):125-8
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;70(5):1853-62
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;57(1):35-42
    1. Mov Disord. 1995 Sep;10(5):622-9
    1. Neurosci Lett. 1997 Oct 3;234(2-3):99-102
    1. Mov Disord. 1997 Nov;12(6):992-9
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Sep;79(9):1076-9
    1. Mov Disord. 1998;13 Suppl 3:2-23
    1. Mov Disord. 1998;13 Suppl 3:24-8
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Jan;66(1):43-7
    1. Nervenarzt. 1998 Dec;69(12):1066-73
    1. J Neurol Sci. 1999 Feb 1;163(1):61-9
    1. Brain Res. 1999 Sep 4;840(1-2):1-15
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;68(6):756-60
    1. Brain. 2000 Aug;123 ( Pt 8):1568-80
    1. J Hand Ther. 2000 Oct-Dec;13(4):276-88
    1. Brain. 2001 Apr;124(Pt 4):720-30
    1. Muscle Nerve. 2001 Jun;24(6):716-35
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jun;82(6):845-50

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren