Financial incentive strategies for maintenance of weight loss: results from an internet-based randomized controlled trial

William S Yancy Jr, Pamela A Shaw, Lisa Wesby, Victoria Hilbert, Lin Yang, Jingsan Zhu, Andrea Troxel, David Huffman, Gary D Foster, Alexis C Wojtanowski, Kevin G Volpp, William S Yancy Jr, Pamela A Shaw, Lisa Wesby, Victoria Hilbert, Lin Yang, Jingsan Zhu, Andrea Troxel, David Huffman, Gary D Foster, Alexis C Wojtanowski, Kevin G Volpp

Abstract

Background/objective: Financial incentives can improve initial weight loss; we examined whether financial incentives can improve weight loss maintenance.

Subjects/methods: Participants aged 30-80 years who lost at least 5 kg during the first 4-6 months in a nationally available commercial weight loss program were recruited via the internet into a three-arm randomized trial of two types of financial incentives versus active control during months 1-6 (Phase I) followed by passive monitoring during months 7-12 (Phase II). Interventions were daily self-weighing and text messaging feedback alone (control) or combined with a lottery-based incentive or a direct incentive. The primary outcome was weight change 6 months after initial weight loss. Secondary outcomes included weight change 12 months after initial weight loss (6 months after cessation of maintenance intervention), and self-reported physical activity and eating behaviors.

Results: Of 191 participants randomized, the mean age was 49.0 (SD = 10.5) years and weight loss prior to randomization was 11.4 (4.7) kg; 92% were women and 89% were White. Mean weight changes during the next 6 months (Phase I) were: lottery -3.0 (5.8) kg; direct -2.8 (5.8) kg; and control -1.4 (5.8) kg (all pairwise comparisons p > 0.1). Weight changes through the end of 12 months post-weight loss (Phase II) were: lottery -1.8 (10.5) kg; direct -0.7 (10.7) kg; and control -0.3 (9.4) kg (all pairwise comparisons p > 0.1). The percentages of participants who maintained their weight loss (defined as gaining ≤1.36 kg) were: lottery 79%, direct 76%, and control 67% at 6 months and lottery 66%, direct 62%, and control 59% at 12 months (all pairwise comparisons p > 0.1). At 6 and 12 months after initial weight loss, changes in self-reported physical activity or eating behaviors did not differ across arms.

Conclusions: Compared with the active control of daily texting based on daily home weighing, lottery-based and direct monetary incentives provided no additional benefit for weight loss maintenance.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

K.G.V. is a principal in the behavioral economics consulting firm VAL Health and has received consulting income and research funding from CVS as well as research support from Weight Watchers, Humana, Hawaii Medical Services Association, and Merck. P.A.S., A.T., and K.G.V. have received research funding from the Vitality Institute. G.D.F. and A.C.W. are employees of Weight Watchers International. Access to Protocol and Statistical Analysis Programming Code may be made upon request to W.C.Y. and K.G.V.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of study participants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average number of days per week self-weighing was performed by arm over time (randomization is time 0)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent weight change by arm from entry into Weight Watchers program over time (randomization is time 0)

References

    1. Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, Wood CL. Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001;74:579–584. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.5.579.
    1. Dombrowski SU, Knittle K, Avenell A, Araujo-Soares V, Sniehotta FF. Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2014;348:g2646. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2646.
    1. Franz MJ, et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2007;107:1755–1767. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.017.
    1. Fothergill, E. et al. Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after “The Biggest Loser” competition. Obesity (Silver Spring) (2016).
    1. Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL. Models of energy homeostasis in response to maintenance of reduced body weight. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016;24:1620–1629. doi: 10.1002/oby.21559.
    1. Voils CI, et al. Differentiating behavior initiation and maintenance: theoretical framework and proof of concept. Health Educ. Behav. 2014;41:325–336. doi: 10.1177/1090198113515242.
    1. Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Byrne KJ. Efficacy of lifestyle modification for long-term weight control. Obes. Res. 2004;12:151S–162SS. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.282.
    1. Volpp KG, et al. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;300:2631–2637. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.804.
    1. Bandura A. Principles of Behavior Modification. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1969.
    1. Shaw, P. A. et al. The design and conduct of Keep It Off: an online randomized trial of financial incentives for weight-loss maintenance. Clin. Trials (2016).
    1. Asch DA, Volpp KG. On the way to health. LDI Issue Brief. 2012;17:1–4.
    1. Craig CL, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
    1. Karlsson J, Persson LO, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2000;24:1715–1725. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801442.
    1. Molenberghs G, Fitzmaurice G, Kenward MG, Tsiatis A, Verbeke G. Handbook of Missing Data Methodology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.
    1. Ware JH. Interpreting incomplete data in studies of diet and weight loss. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:2136–2137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe030054.
    1. Stevens J, Truesdale KP, McClain JE, Cai J. The definition of weight maintenance. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.). 2006;30:391–399. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803175.
    1. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 1979;6:65–70.
    1. Pacanowski CR, Bertz FC, Levitsky DA. Daily self-weighing to control body weight in adults: a critical review of the literature. SAGE Open. 2014;4:1–16. doi: 10.1177/2158244014556992.
    1. Burns RJ, et al. A theoretically grounded systematic review of material incentives for weight loss: implications for interventions. Ann. Behav. Med. 2012;44:375–388. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9403-4.
    1. Finkelstein EA, Linnan LA, Tate DF, Birken BE. A pilot study testing the effect of different levels of financial incentives on weight loss among overweight employees. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007;49:981–989. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31813c6dcb.
    1. Jeffery RW, Gerber WM, Rosenthal BS, Lindquist RA. Monetary contracts in weight control: effectiveness of group and individual contracts of varying size. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1983;51:242–248. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.51.2.242.
    1. Jeffery RW, Thompson PD, Wing RR. Effects on weight reduction of strong monetary contracts for calorie restriction or weight loss. Behav. Res. Ther. 1978;16:363–369. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(78)90005-0.
    1. Kullgren JT, et al. Individual- versus group-based financial incentives for weight loss: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013;158:505–514. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00002.
    1. Kirby KN. Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1997;126:54–70. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.54.
    1. Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Q. J. Econ. 1992;107:573–597. doi: 10.2307/2118482.
    1. Weber BJ, Chapman GB. Playing for peanuts: why is risk seeking more common for low-stakes gambles? Organ. Behav. Hum. 2005;97:31–46. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.001.
    1. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 1991;5:193–206. doi: 10.1257/jep.5.1.193.
    1. Connolly T, Butler DU. Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2006;19:148–158. doi: 10.1002/bdm.510.
    1. Camerer C, Ho TH. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica. 1999;67:837–874. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00054.
    1. Loewenstein G, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 2001;127:267–286. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.
    1. Dyrstad SM, Hansen BH, Holme IM, Anderssen SA. Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014;46:99–106. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a0595f.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren