Significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) was performed for young and old rats in two different tissues (liver and perinephric fat). (A) The panel shows a standard Q-Q plot with expected T statistic along the x-axis and observed T-statistic along the y-axis. Values were calculated using a two-class unpaired model comparing young and old liver data, with s0 (~0.59) automatically generated. The solid diagonal line indicates a 45-degree line of equivalent observed:expected ratios, and two dashed lines indicate thresholds of confidence corresponding to δ=0.688. Green and red datapoints represent significant hyper- and hypomethylation, with age, respectively. Thus, SAM identifies a large number of highly significant changes in DNA methylation that occur in liver specifically (380 total loci with estimated false discovery rate (FDR)
Figure 4. LUMA as a technology to…
Figure 4. LUMA as a technology to assess age-related changes in global DNA methylation
Figure 4. LUMA as a technology to assess age-related changes in global DNA methylation DNA methylation was measured by the luminometric methylation assay (LUMA) in two tissues (Fat and Liver) from young and old rats. Each corresponding boxplot is a representation of the group-specific levels of methylation, shown along the y-axis (range from 0 to 100 with 0 indicating complete methylation). Within each boxplot, the solid black line indicates median methylation, with the upper and lower limits of each box corresponding to the 75% and 25% quantiles of the data. The bars associated with each box represent the extremes of the data. The distributions of methylation levels in each tissue were compared, demonstrating that liver tends to be more methylated than adipose tissue irrespective of age (p=0.09). Moreover, age-related differences were observed in liver, with relative hypomethylation in older animals (p=0.03). Note that p-values were obtained by two-group unpaired t-test.
Figure 5. Genomic distributions of DNA methylation…
Figure 5. Genomic distributions of DNA methylation in normal and aging tissues
Figure 5. Genomic distributions of DNA methylation in normal and aging tissues HELP data were divided into five different subsets representing constitutively hypomethylated loci, constitutively hypermethylated loci, and tissue-specific differentially-methylated regions (DMR, Liver compared with Adipose) in panel (A), as well as age-related DMRs (Young compared with Old) specific to either liver or adipose tissue in panel (B). Overlap of these subsets with six different genomic features (gene bodies, promoters including 10 kb upstream of transcription start sites, intergenic regions, CpG islands, CG clusters, and conserved non-coding elements) was measured and is shown from left to right in both panels. We also show genomic distributions for the whole microarray (All Loci, both panels), and are thus able to determine if a given subset of HELP data is enriched or depleted for any given genomic feature beyond what one might expect to see by random chance. Many of the differences shown are associated with negligible probability that they might occur with random sampling of the data (tailed hypergeometric distribution; *, **, ***, and **** indicate PSupp. Table 2).
Figure 6. Identification of loci at which…
Figure 6. Identification of loci at which cytosine methylation and gene expression are both altered…
Figure 6. Identification of loci at which cytosine methylation and gene expression are both altered with aging We focused on the loci identified in Figure 2A, plotting HELP data along the x-axis and corresponding gene expression data for these loci along the y-axis. A total of 378 loci with significant differences in cytosine methylation were analyzed, 347 of which were mapped to RefSeq genes, and 31 of which demonstrated a corresponding robust difference in gene expression with age (> 2.5 SD from the mean of the overall distribution of gene expression data). Solid gray horizontal lines indicate the 2.5 SD cutoffs for these gene expression data, while solid gray vertical lines indicate the 95th percentile (approximately 2 SD) cutoffs for cytosine methylation data. Numerical labels appear in each of the four corners of the plot, corresponding to the number of datapoints meeting the defined criteria.
Figure 7. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) reveals…
Figure 7. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) reveals that many of the most differentially-methylated genes form…
Figure 7. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) reveals that many of the most differentially-methylated genes form a molecular interaction network of particular relevance for metabolism RefSeq identifiers for 75 of the top 102 sites (filtered from an input list of 65,000, by pABCG4, ABCG5, ABCG8, Abcg5/Abcg8, AGT, BACE2, β-estradiol, C1ORF109, CPA1, FBP1, FBP2, Fructose 1,6 Bisphosphatase, Fructose 2,6 Bisphosphatase, GLE1, GMPPB, HBS1L, HNF4A, HSPH1, IKBKB, IP6K1, KRT10, LEP, LEPROT, NOXO1, NTHL1, NUDT1, PFKL, PROZ, RNMTL1, SERPINA10, SLC22A1, SLC22A3, SLC2A2, SLC38A4, XPA.