Disparities in Acceptance of Deceased Donor Kidneys Between the United States and France and Estimated Effects of Increased US Acceptance

Olivier Aubert, Peter P Reese, Benoit Audry, Yassine Bouatou, Marc Raynaud, Denis Viglietti, Christophe Legendre, Denis Glotz, Jean-Phillipe Empana, Xavier Jouven, Carmen Lefaucheur, Christian Jacquelinet, Alexandre Loupy, Olivier Aubert, Peter P Reese, Benoit Audry, Yassine Bouatou, Marc Raynaud, Denis Viglietti, Christophe Legendre, Denis Glotz, Jean-Phillipe Empana, Xavier Jouven, Carmen Lefaucheur, Christian Jacquelinet, Alexandre Loupy

Abstract

Importance: Approximately 3500 donated kidneys are discarded in the United States each year, drawing concern from Medicare and advocacy groups.

Objective: To estimate the effects of more aggressive allograft acceptance practices on the donor pool and allograft survival for the population of US wait-listed kidney transplant candidates.

Design, setting, and participants: A nationwide study using validated registries from the United States and France comprising comprehensive cohorts of deceased donors with organs offered to kidney transplant centers between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2018, and April 5, 2019.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was kidney allograft discard. The secondary outcome was allograft failure after transplantation. We used logistic regression to model organ acceptance and discard practices in both countries. We then quantified using computer simulation models the number of kidneys discarded in the United States that a more aggressive system would have instead used for transplantation. Finally, based on actual survival data, we quantified the additional years of allograft life that a redesigned US system would have saved.

Findings: In the United States, 156 089 kidneys were recovered from deceased donors between 2004 and 2014, of which 128 102 were transplanted, and 27 987 (17.9%) were discarded. In France, among the 29 984 kidneys recovered between 2004 and 2014, 27 252 were transplanted, and 2732 (9.1%, P < .001 vs United States) were discarded. The mean (SD) age of kidneys transplanted in the United States was 36.51 (17.02) years vs 50.91 (17.34) years in France (P < .001). Kidney quality showed little change in the United States over time (mean [SD] kidney donor risk index [KDRI], 1.30 [0.48] in 2004 vs 1.32 [0.46] in 2014), whereas a steadily rising KDRI in France reflected a temporal trend of more aggressive organ use (mean [SD] KDRI, 1.37 [0.47] in 2004 vs 1.74 [0.72] in 2014; P < .001). We applied the French-based allocation model to the population of US deceased donor kidneys and found that 17 435 (62%) of kidneys discarded in the United States would have instead been transplanted under the French system. We further determined that a redesigned system with more aggressive organ acceptance practices would generate an additional 132 445 allograft life-years in the United States over the 10-year observation period.

Conclusions and relevance: Greater acceptance of kidneys from deceased donors who are older and have more comorbidities could provide major survival benefits to the population of US wait-listed patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03723668.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Reese reported investigator-initiated grants from Merck and AbbVie to the University of Pennsylvania to support research on transplantation of hepatitis C–infected organs into uninfected recipients, followed by antiviral treatment, investigator-initiated grants from CVS Caremark and Merck to the University of Pennsylvania to support research on medication adherence, consulting with Collaborative Healthcare Research & Data Analytics (COHRDATA) on epidemiology of medications to improve laboratory parameters including potassium among dialysis patients, and position as associate editor for the American Journal of Kidney Diseases. Dr Legendre reported personal fees from Alexion and personal fees from CSL Behring outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Deceased Donor Kidneys Transplanted and…
Figure 1.. Deceased Donor Kidneys Transplanted and Discarded in the United States and France Between 2004 and 2014 and Their Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) Scoresa
Data are based on 156 089 recovered kidneys in the United States, including 128 102 transplanted and 27 987 discarded kidneys, and on 29 984 recovered kidneys in France, including 27 252 transplanted and 2732 discarded kidneys. A, The distribution of KDRI scores for transplanted (blue) and discarded (orange) kidneys in the United States. B, The distribution of the KDRI score for transplanted (blue) and discarded (orange) kidneys in France. Dashed vertical lines correspond to the mean KDRI of transplanted kidneys (dashed blue) and discarded (dashed orange) kidneys. C, The probability of discard in the United States by KDRI; and D, The probability of discard in France by KDRI. The blue curve corresponds to the probability of discard according to the KDRI in the United States (C) and in France (D). aLower KDRI indicates better kidney quality.
Figure 2.. Number of Actually Transplanted and…
Figure 2.. Number of Actually Transplanted and Discarded Kidneys in the United States Contrasted With the Number of Kidneys That Would Have Been Saved and Discarded Using a Redesigned System
The number of actually transplanted and discarded kidneys in the United States between 2004 and 2014 and the kidneys that would have been transplanted and discarded if the French model had been applied in the United States. The blue line shows the number of kidneys that would have been saved in the United States if the French model had been applied. Overall, a total of 17 435 US kidneys would have been saved during the observation period.
Figure 3.. Estimation of the Allograft Life-Years…
Figure 3.. Estimation of the Allograft Life-Years Gained From Reducing Kidney Discard Rates in the United States Through a Redesigned System
KDRI Indicates Kidney Donor Risk Index. The greatest gain in life-years is achieved through reduced discard of the lowest-quality kidneys. A, The life-years saved by decile of the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) by applying French acceptance-based patterns to the pool of US kidneys. B, The life-years saved overall if organ acceptance patterns in the United States had followed the French acceptance model.

References

    1. Axelrod DA, Schnitzler MA, Xiao H, et al. . An economic assessment of contemporary kidney transplant practice. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(5):1168-1176. doi:10.1111/ajt.14702
    1. Eurotransplant. . Accessed January 7, 2019.
    1. Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. . OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(suppl 1):21-116. doi:10.1111/ajt.14124
    1. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). . Accessed January 7, 2019.
    1. Reese PP, Harhay MN, Abt PL, Levine MH, Halpern SD. New solutions to reduce discard of kidneys donated for transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(4):973-980. doi:10.1681/ASN.2015010023
    1. Stewart DE, Garcia VC, Rosendale JD, Klassen DK, Carrico BJ. Diagnosing the decades-long rise in the deceased donor kidney discard rate in the United States. Transplantation. 2017;101(3):575-587. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001539
    1. Gill J, Joffres Y, Rose C, et al. . The change in living kidney donation in women and men in the United States (2005-2015): a population-based analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(4):1301-1308. doi:10.1681/ASN.2017111160
    1. Tullius SG, Rabb H. Improving the supply and quality of deceased-donor organs for transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(20):1920-1929. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1507080
    1. Massie AB, Luo X, Chow EK, Alejo JL, Desai NM, Segev DL. Survival benefit of primary deceased donor transplantation with high-KDPI kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(10):2310-2316. doi:10.1111/ajt.12830
    1. Merion RM, Ashby VB, Wolfe RA, et al. . Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation. JAMA. 2005;294(21):2726-2733. doi:10.1001/jama.294.21.2726
    1. Cohen JB, Eddinger KC, Locke JE, Forde KA, Reese PP, Sawinski DL. Survival benefit of transplantation with a deceased diabetic donor kidney compared with remaining on the waitlist. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(6):974-982. doi:10.2215/CJN.10280916
    1. Schold JD, Buccini LD, Srinivas TR, et al. . The association of center performance evaluations and kidney transplant volume in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(1):67-75. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04345.x
    1. Whiting JF, Golconda M, Smith R, O’Brien S, First MR, Alexander JW. Economic costs of expanded criteria donors in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1998;65(2):204-207. doi:10.1097/00007890-199801270-00010
    1. Saidi RF, Elias N, Kawai T, et al. . Outcome of kidney transplantation using expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death kidneys: realities and costs. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(12):2769-2774. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01993.x
    1. Kasiske BL, Stewart DE, Bista BR, et al. . The role of procurement biopsies in acceptance decisions for kidneys retrieved for transplant. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(3):562-571. doi:10.2215/CJN.07610713
    1. Ekser B, Powelson JA, Fridell JA, Goggins WC, Taber TE. Is the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) universal or UNOS-specific? Am J Transplant. 2018;18(4):1031-1032.
    1. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al. . A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index. Transplantation. 2009;88(2):231-236. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ac620b
    1. Bae S, Massie AB, Luo X, Anjum S, Desai NM, Segev DL. Changes in discard rate after the introduction of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Am J Transplant. 2016;16(7):2202-2207. doi:10.1111/ajt.13769
    1. Frei U, Noeldeke J, Machold-Fabrizii V, et al. . Prospective age-matching in elderly kidney transplant recipients—a 5-year analysis of the Eurotransplant Senior Program. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(1):50-57.
    1. Rose C, Schaeffner E, Frei U, Gill J, Gill JS. A lifetime of allograft function with kidneys from older donors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(10):2483-2493. doi:10.1681/ASN.2014080771
    1. Cristal Agence de la Biomédecine . Accessed January 7, 2019.
    1. Strang WN, Tuppin P, Atinault A, Jacquelinet C. The French organ transplant data system. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:77-82.
    1. Agence de la Biomédecine . Accessed January 7, 2019.
    1. Lehner LJ, Kleinsteuber A, Halleck F, et al. . Assessment of the Kidney Donor Profile Index in a European cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33(8):1465-1472. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy030
    1. Peters-Sengers H, Heemskerk MBA, Geskus RB, et al. . Validation of the Prognostic Kidney Donor Risk Index Scoring System of Deceased Donors for Renal Transplantation in the Netherlands. Transplantation. 2018;102(1):162-170. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001889
    1. Metropolis N. The beginning of the Monte Carlo method. Stanislaw Ulam Los Alamos Sci. 1987;15:125-130.
    1. Efron B. Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika. 1981;63:589-599. doi:10.1093/biomet/68.3.589
    1. Lamb KE, Lodhi S, Meier-Kriesche HU. Long-term renal allograft survival in the United States: a critical reappraisal. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(3):450-462. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03283.x
    1. Mohan S, Chiles MC, Patzer RE, et al. . Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney Int. 2018;94(1):187-198. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.016
    1. Young EW, Goodkin DA, Mapes DL, et al. . The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): An international hemodialysis study. Kidney Int. 2000;57(suppl 74):S-74-S-81. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.07413.x
    1. Rosenblum AM, Li AH, Roels L, et al. . Worldwide variability in deceased organ donation registries. Transpl Int. 2012;25(8):801-811. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01472.x
    1. Shepherd L, O’Carroll RE, Ferguson E. An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study. BMC Med. 2014;12:131. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4
    1. Rao PS, Merion RM, Ashby VB, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Kayler LK. Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2007;83(8):1069-1074. doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000259621.56861.31
    1. Schold JD, Meier-Kriesche HU. Which renal transplant candidates should accept marginal kidneys in exchange for a shorter waiting time on dialysis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(3):532-538. doi:10.2215/CJN.01130905
    1. Peters-Sengers H, Berger SP, Heemskerk MB, et al. . Stretching the limits of renal transplantation in elderly recipients of grafts from elderly deceased donors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(2):621-631. doi:10.1681/ASN.2015080879
    1. Pérez-Sáez MJ, Arcos E, Comas J, Crespo M, Lloveras J, Pascual J; Catalan Renal Registry Committee . Survival benefit from kidney transplantation using kidneys from deceased donors aged ≥75 years: a time-dependent analysis. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(9):2724-2733. doi:10.1111/ajt.13800
    1. Collini A, Kalmar P, Dhamo A, Ruggieri G, Carmellini M. Renal transplant from very old donors: how far can we go? Transplantation. 2009;87(12):1830-1836. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a6b4ff
    1. Goldberg DS, Halpern SD, Reese PP. Deceased organ donation consent rates among racial and ethnic minorities and older potential donors. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):496-505. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318271198c
    1. Gill JS, Tonelli M. Penny wise, pound foolish? Coverage limits on immunosuppression after kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(7):586-589. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1114394
    1. Merion RM, Goodrich NP, Johnson RJ, et al. . Kidney transplant graft outcomes in 379 257 recipients on 3 continents. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(8):1914-1923. doi:10.1111/ajt.14694
    1. Ojo AO, Morales JM, González-Molina M, et al. ; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and; Spanish Chronic Allograft Study Group . Comparison of the long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation: USA versus Spain. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(1):213-220. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs287
    1. Tullius SG, Milford E. Kidney allocation and the aging immune response. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1369-1370. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1103007

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren