Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample

Nancy L Atkinson, Sandra L Saperstein, John Pleis, Nancy L Atkinson, Sandra L Saperstein, John Pleis

Abstract

Background: eHealth tools on the Internet have the potential to help people manage their health and health care. However, little is known about the distribution and use of different kinds of eHealth tools across the population or within population subgroups.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and predictors of participation in specific online health-related activities.

Methods: A secondary data analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2005 was conducted to study three online behaviors among Internet users (n = 3244): searching for health information for oneself, participating in a support group for those with similar health or medical conditions, and purchasing medicine or vitamins.

Results: A total of 58% of Internet users reported searching for health information for themselves, 3.8% used online support groups, and 12.8% bought medicine or vitamins online in the past year. Multivariate analysis found that those seeking health information were more likely to be women (OR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.60, 3.09), have cable or satellite Internet connections (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.22, 2.45) or DSL connections (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.36, 2.76), have Internet access from work (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.27, 4.67) or from home and work (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.31, 2.30), and report more hours of weekday Internet use (OR = 4.12, 95% CI = 2.41, 7.07). Those with a high school education or less (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.63) and those with some college (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49, 0.89) were less likely to search for health information. Online support groups were more likely to be used by those with "fair" health (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.21, 8.92) and "poor" health (OR = 5.98, 95% CI = 1.49, 24.07) and those with lower incomes (OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.09, 6.41) and less likely to be used by those with Internet access both at home and work (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.90). Those who were age 35-49 (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.43, 3.26), age 50-64 (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.53, 3.89), and age 65-74 (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.30, 3.67) and those who were married (OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.13, 3.30) were more likely to purchase medicine or vitamins online.

Conclusions: The Internet was most widely used as a health information resource, with less participation in the purchase of medicine and vitamins and in online support groups. Results suggest that modifying survey questions to better capture forms of online support and medications purchased could provide greater understanding of the nature of participation in these activities.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, authors. Expanding the reach and impact of consumer e-health tools. Rockville, MD: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2006. .
    1. Lorence Daniel P, Park Heeyoung, Fox Susannah. Assessing health consumerism on the Web: a demographic profile of information-seeking behaviors. J Med Syst. 2006 Aug;30(4):251–8.
    1. Eysenbach Gunther. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(6):356–71. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356.
    1. Drug company’s consumer health portal encourages return visits. Internet Healthc Strateg. 2004;6(7):7–8.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, authors. Making Health Communication Programs Work. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2002.
    1. Kreps Gary L. Evaluating new health information technologies: expanding the frontiers of health care delivery and health promotion. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;80:205–12.
    1. Fox S, Rainie L. The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2000. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. Beckjord Ellen Burke, Finney Rutten Lila J, Squiers Linda, Arora Neeraj K, Volckmann Lindsey, Moser Richard P, Hesse Bradford W. Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS) J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e20. v9i3e20
    1. Fox S. Health information online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2005. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. Bansil Pooja, Keenan Nora L, Zlot Amy I, Gilliland Jeanne C. Health-related information on the Web: results from the HealthStyles Survey, 2002-2003. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Mar 15;3(2):A36.
    1. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, et al. Effect of Computer Support on Younger Women with Breast Cancer. J Gen Int Med. 2001;16(7):435–445. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x.
    1. Gustafson David H, Hawkins Robert P, Boberg Eric W, McTavish Fiona, Owens Betta, Wise Meg, Berhe Haile, Pingree Suzanne. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Int J Med Inform. 2002 Nov 12;65(3):169–77. doi: 10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00048-5.S1386505602000485
    1. McTavish FM, Pingree S, Hawkins R, Gustafson D. Cultural differences in use of an electronic discussion group. J Health Psych. 2003;8(1):105–17. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001447.
    1. Rimer Barbara K, Lyons Elizabeth J, Ribisl Kurt M, Bowling J Michael, Golin Carol E, Forlenza Michael J, Meier Andrea. How new subscribers use cancer-related online mailing lists. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e32. v7i3e32
    1. Horrigan JB, Rainie L. Online communities: networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2001. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. Fallows D. How women and men use the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2005. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. Wen H Joseph, Tan Joseph. Mapping e-health strategies: thinking outside the traditional healthcare box. Int J Electron Healthc. 2005;1(3):261–76. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2005.006474.M15U7T7C86J5PFHH
    1. Baker Laurence, Wagner Todd H, Singer Sara, Bundorf M Kate. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003 May 14;289(18):2400–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400. 289/18/2400
    1. Fox S. Prescription drugs online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2004. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. Nelson David E, Kreps Gary L, Hesse Bradford W, Croyle Robert T, Willis Gordon, Arora Neeraj K, Rimer Barbara K, Viswanath K V, Weinstein Neil, Alden Sara. The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun. 2004;9(5):443–60; discussion 81-4. doi: 10.1080/10810730490504233.3F44L3KHM6U0HRED
    1. Cantor D, Covell J, Davis T, Park I, Rizzo L. Health Information National Trends Survey 2005 Final Report. [2008-04-8]. .
    1. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, TX: StatCorp LP; 2005.
    1. Han Paul K J, Moser Richard P, Klein William M P. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1(1):51–69. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637541.NN0710L203K3000M
    1. Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Hesse B. Cancer-related information seeking: Hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) J Health Comm. 2006;11(1):147–56. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637574.
    1. Squiers L, Bright MA, Rutten LJ, et al. Awareness of the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Information Service: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) J Health Comm. 2006;11(1):117–133. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637517.
    1. Health Information National Trends Survey: Search HINTS Questions. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. Hesse Bradford W, Nelson David E, Kreps Gary L, Croyle Robert T, Arora Neeraj K, Rimer Barbara K, Viswanath Kasisomayajula. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618–24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618. 165/22/2618
    1. Horrigan J. Home Broadband Adoption. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2006. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. Nielsen J. Lower-literacy users. [2008-04-12]. .
    1. Zarcadoolas C, Blanco M, Boyer JF, Pleasant A. Unweaving the web: an exploratory study of low-literate adults’ navigation skills on the world wide web. J Health Comm Jul-Sep;7(4):309-24.
    1. Morahan-Martin Janet M. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Oct;7(5):497–510.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, authors. Healthy People 2010. 2nd edition. With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2 vols. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
    1. National Cancer Institute. [2008-04-15]. HINTS Questions .
    1. US Department of Commerce, authors. A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration; 2004. [2008-01-16]. .
    1. US Department of Commerce, authors. Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration; 1999. [2008-01-16].
    1. Fox S. Digital Divisions. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2005. [2008-01-16]. .

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren