INSTIGO Trial: Evaluation of a Plasma Protein Profile as a Predictive Biomarker for Metastatic Relapse of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Hugo Veyssière, Sejdi Lusho, Ioana Molnar, Myriam Kossai, Maureen Bernadach, Catherine Abrial, Yannick Bidet, Nina Radosevic-Robin, Xavier Durando, Hugo Veyssière, Sejdi Lusho, Ioana Molnar, Myriam Kossai, Maureen Bernadach, Catherine Abrial, Yannick Bidet, Nina Radosevic-Robin, Xavier Durando

Abstract

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of breast cancers but has no specific therapy. While TNBC may be more sensitive to chemotherapy than other types of breast cancer, it has a poor prognosis. Most TNBC relapses occur during the five years following treatment, however predictive biomarkers of metastatic relapse are still lacking. High tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) levels before and after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are associated with lower relapse risk and longer survival but TILs assessment is highly error-prone and still not introduced into the clinic. Therefore, having reliable biomarker of relapse, but easier to assess, remains essential for TNBC management. Searching for such biomarkers among serum/plasma proteins, circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) and blood cells appear relevant.

Methods: This single-centre and prospective study aims to discover predictive biomarkers of TNBC relapse and particularly focuses on plasma proteins. Blood samples will be taken at diagnosis, on the day of first-line or post-NAC surgery, on the day of radiotherapy start, then 6 months and one year after radiotherapy. A blood sample will be taken at the time of metastatic relapse diagnosis. Blood samples will be used for circulating protein quantification, blood cell counts and circulating tumour DNA quantification. A tumour RNA signature, based on the analysis of the RNA expression of 6 genes, will also be tested from the initial biopsy taken routinely. In NAC patients, TILs quantity will be assessed on TNBC pre-treatment biopsy and surgical specimen.

Ethics and dissemination: INSTIGO belongs to category 2 interventional research on humans. This study has been approved by the SUD-EST IV ethics committee and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04438681.

Keywords: RNA signature; TILs; blood cells; ctDNA; metastatic relapse; plasma proteins; predictive biomarker; triple negative breast cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Veyssière, Lusho, Molnar, Kossai, Bernadach, Abrial, Bidet, Radosevic-Robin and Durando.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of the INSTIGO study. Patients will have blood samples taken at diagnosis, on the day of first-line surgery or post-NAC surgery, on the day of the start of radiotherapy, and 6 months and one year after radiotherapy. If necessary, a blood sample will be taken at the time of diagnosis of metastatic relapse. Blood samples will be used for circulating proteins quantification, blood cells assay and circulating tumour DNA quantification. In neoadjuvant setting, TILs rate will be evaluated from tumour tissue from the biopsy and from the operating room.

References

    1. Lee J, Kim D-M, Lee A. Prognostic Role and Clinical Association of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte, Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression With Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Locally Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res Treat (2019) 51:649–63. 10.4143/crt.2018.270
    1. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. . Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence. Clin Cancer Res (2007) 13:4429–34. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045
    1. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med (2010) 363:1938–48. 10.1056/NEJMra1001389
    1. Garrido-Castro AC, Lin NU, Polyak K. Insights Into Molecular Classifications of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving Patient Selection for Treatment. Cancer Discov (2019) 9:176–98. 10.1158/-18-1177
    1. Loi S, Drubay D, Adams S, Pruneri G, Francis PA, Lacroix-Triki M, et al. . Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Prognosis: A Pooled Individual Patient Analysis of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. J Clin Oncol (2019) 37:559–69. 10.1200/JCO.18.01010
    1. Luen SJ, Salgado R, Dieci MV, Vingiani A, Curigliano G, Gould RE, et al. . Prognostic Implications of Residual Disease Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Residual Cancer Burden in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Oncol (2019) 30:236–42. 10.1093/annonc/mdy547
    1. Dieci MV, Radosevic-Robin N, Fineberg S, van den Eynden G, Ternes N, Penault-Llorca F, et al. . Update on Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (Tils) in Breast Cancer, Including Recommendations to Assess TILs in Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Therapy and in Carcinoma in Situ: A Report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. Semin Cancer Biol (2018) 52:16–25. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.10.003
    1. Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, et al. . The Evaluation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (Tils) in Breast Cancer: Recommendations by an International Tils Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol (2015) 26:259–71. 10.1093/annonc/mdu450
    1. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer J-U, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, et al. . Definition and Impact of Pathologic Complete Response on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Various Intrinsic Breast Cancer Subtypes. J Clin Oncol (2012) 30:1796–804. 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595
    1. Ghajar CM. Metastasis Prevention by Targeting the Dormant Niche. Nat Rev Cancer (2015) 15:238–47. 10.1038/nrc3910
    1. Redig AJ, McAllister SS. Breast Cancer as a Systemic Disease: A View of Metastasis. J Intern Med (2013) 274:113–26. 10.1111/joim.12084
    1. Benoy IH, Salgado R, Dam PV, Geboers K, Marck EV, Scharpé S, et al. . Increased Serum Interleukin-8 in Patients With Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer Correlates With Early Dissemination and Survival. Clin Cancer Res (2004) 10:7157–62. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0812
    1. Endo M, Yamamoto Y, Nakano M, Masuda T, Odagiri H, Horiguchi H, et al. . Serum ANGPTL2 Levels Reflect Clinical Features of Breast Cancer Patients: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Breast Cancer Metastasis. Int J Biol Markers (2014) 29:239–45. 10.5301/jbm.5000080
    1. Noman AS, Uddin M, Chowdhury AA, Nayeem MJ, Raihan Z, Rashid MI, et al. . Serum Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) and Interleukin-(IL-6) as Dual Prognostic Biomarkers in Progressive Metastatic Breast Cancer. Sci Rep (2017) 7. 10.1038/s41598-017-01268-4
    1. Bahhnassy A, Mohanad M, Shaarawy S, Ismail MF, El-Bastawisy A, Ashmawy AM, et al. . Transforming Growth Factor-β, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/insulin-like Growth Factor I Receptor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-a: Prognostic and Predictive Markers in Triple-Negative and non-Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Mol Med Rep (2015) 12:851–64. 10.3892/mmr.2015.3560
    1. Ethier J-L, Desautels D, Templeton A, Shah PS, Amir E. Prognostic Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Breast Cancer Res BCR (2017) 19. 10.1186/s13058-016-0794-1
    1. Huszno J, Kołosza Z, Mrochem-Kwarciak J, Zajusz A. Prognostic Value of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte, Platelet-Lymphocyte, and Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratios in Male Breast Cancer Patients. Oncology (2020) 98:1–6. 10.1159/000505627
    1. Chae S, Kang KM, Kim HJ, Kang E, Park SY, Kim JH, et al. . Neutrophil–Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Response to Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Curr Oncol (2018) 25:e113–9. 10.3747/co.25.3888
    1. Patel DA, Xi J, Luo J, Hassan B, Thomas S, Ma CX, et al. . Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2019) 174:443–52. 10.1007/s10549-018-05106-7
    1. Alix-Panabières C, Pantel K. Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA as Liquid Biopsy. Cancer Discov (2016) 6:479–91. 10.1158/-15-1483
    1. Beddowes E, Sammut SJ, Gao M, Caldas C. Predicting Treatment Resistance and Relapse Through Circulating DNA. Breast (2017) 34:S31–5. 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.024
    1. Fernandez-Garcia D, Hills A, Page K, Hastings RK, Toghill B, Goddard KS, et al. . Plasma Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) as a Predictive and Prognostic Marker in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res BCR (2019) 21. 10.1186/s13058-019-1235-8
    1. Chia SK, Bramwell VH, Tu D, Shepherd LE, Jiang S, Vickery T, et al. . A 50-Gene Intrinsic Subtype Classifier for Prognosis and Prediction of Benefit From Adjuvant Tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res (2012) 18:4465–72. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0286
    1. Vieira AF, Schmitt F. An Update on Breast Cancer Multigene Prognostic Tests—Emergent Clinical Biomarkers. Front Med (2018) 5:248. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00248
    1. Wallden B, Storhoff J, Nielsen T, Dowidar N, Schaper C, Ferree S, et al. . Development and Verification of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Gene Signature Assay. BMC Med Genomics (2015) 8:54. 10.1186/s12920-015-0129-6
    1. Soliman H, Shah V, Srkalovic G, Mahtani R, Levine E, Mavromatis B, et al. . MammaPrint Guides Treatment Decisions in Breast Cancer: Results of the IMPACt Trial. BMC Cancer (2020) 20:81. 10.1186/s12885-020-6534-z
    1. Mittempergher L, Delahaye LJ, Witteveen AT, Snel MH, Mee S, Chan BY, et al. . Performance Characteristics of the BluePrint® Breast Cancer Diagnostic Test. Transl Oncol (2020) 13:100756. 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100756

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren