How can second-stage management prevent perineal trauma? Critical review

P Flynn, J Franiek, P Janssen, W J Hannah, M C Klein, P Flynn, J Franiek, P Janssen, W J Hannah, M C Klein

Abstract

Objective: To learn which factors influencing perineal integrity were modifiable by physicians and pregnant women.

Data sources: Medical, nursing, and midwifery literature was searched mainly for randomized controlled trials.

Study selection: We chose articles on perineal trauma pattern, sexual dysfunction or satisfaction, urinary incontinence, and pelvic floor function. We identified 80 papers and studied 16 in detail.

Synthesis: Five factors affected perineal integrity: episiotomy, third-trimester perineal massage, mother's position in second-stage labour, method of pushing, and administration of epidural analgesia. Episiotomy does not improve perineal outcomes when used routinely. Third-trimester perineal massage was discussed only in inadequate studies. Studies comparing position in birth chairs and recumbent versus upright positions were inadequate for making firm recommendations. Studies of methods of pushing and use of epidural analgesia were limited and uncontrolled; no recommendations were possible.

Conclusion: Only limiting episiotomy can be strongly recommended. In the absence of strong data to the contrary, women should be encouraged to engage in perineal massage if they wish and to adopt the birth positions of their choice. Caretakers should be aware of the possibility of interfering with placental function when women hold their breath for a long time when pushing.

References

    1. Birth. 1991 Mar;18(1):5-10
    1. J Nurse Midwifery. 1984 Jan-Feb;29(1):3-11
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 May;87(5):408-12
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jul;98(7):667-74
    1. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957 Dec;64(6):815-20
    1. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Feb;25(1):65-8
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Mar;96(3):327-33
    1. J Nurse Midwifery. 1986 May-Jun;31(3):128-34
    1. Phys Rev Lett. 1987 May 4;58(18):1814-1817
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Sep 8;289(6445):587-90
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;171(3):591-8
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 26;295(6601):749-51
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Jun 30;288(6435):1971-5
    1. Lancet. 1983 Jun 11;1(8337):1296-8
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Nov;96(11):1290-6

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren