Is It Possible to Achieve Favorable Accelerated Dental Changes with No Periodontal Complications When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy? A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

Hanin Nizar Khlef, Mohammad Younis Hajeer, Hanin Nizar Khlef, Mohammad Younis Hajeer

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this trial was to evaluate the dental changes, periodontal health, and tooth vitality in mini-screw-supported en-masse retraction with two corticotomy-based acceleration techniques. Study Design. The sample included 38 adult patients presenting with class II division 1 malocclusion (three males, 35 females; age range between 18 and 30 years), needing the extraction of upper first premolars followed by en-masse retraction. The sample was divided randomly and equally into two groups. Randomization was carried out by random numbers generated by the computer with a 1 : 1 allocation ratio. The allocation concealment was carried out by sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. The interventions were traditional corticotomy (TC) versus flapless corticotomy (FC). Mini-screws were inserted between the upper second premolar and first molar, bilaterally. The primary outcome was evaluating dental changes. Secondary outcomes were the periodontal health and pulp vitality of the maxillary teeth. Mann-Whitney U test and two-sample t-test with Bonferroni correction were used to analyze the data.

Results: The en-masse retraction rate in the first three months was higher in the TC group than the FC group (1.82, 1.66, and 1.39 mm/month vs 1.60, 1.42, and 1.22 mm/month, respectively) with statistically significant differences (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P=0.001, respectively). The en-masse retraction amount was greater in the TC group than the FC group (6.84 mm vs 6.18 mm, respectively) with statistically significant differences (P=0.002). There was an increase in the inter-canine and inter-molar widths with a minor distal movement of the upper first molar in the two groups, with no significant differences between them (P > 0.008). The values of gingival, papillary bleeding and plaque indices in the TC group were significantly greater than those in the FC group after performing the corticotomy (P < 0.001, P < 0.003, P=0.002, respectively). No gingival recession was found on any of the examined teeth in both groups. All teeth maintained their vitality at all measurement times in both groups. No severe harms were noticed in any group.

Conclusions: Both traditional and flapless corticotomy techniques resulted in clinically similar rates of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth, with similar dental changes and no significant periodontal complications or tooth vitality loss. The minimally invasive flapless corticotomy appeared to be a good alternative to the more invasive traditional corticotomy. This trial is registered with https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identification code: NCT04847492), retrospectively registered.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the submitted manuscript.

Copyright © 2022 Hanin Nizar Khlef and Mohammad Younis Hajeer.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) participants' flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The flapless corticotomy from the buccal view (a) and the palatal view (b).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The traditional corticotomy from the buccal view (a) from the palatal view (b) and the surgical flap suturing (c).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Landmarks used on study models. (1) The medial end of the right third palatal ruga, (2) the medial end of the left third palatal ruga, (3) the cusp of the right maxillary canine, (4) the cusp of the left maxillary canine, (5) the middle of the incisal edge of the right maxillary central incisor, (6) the middle of the incisal edge of the left maxillary central incisor, (7) the central fossa of the maxillary right first molar, (8) the central fossa of the maxillary left first molar, (9) the midpalatal suture line.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Measurements on digital photographs using the ImageJ program.

References

    1. Lee J., Miyazawa K., Tabuchi M., Sato T., Kawaguchi M., Goto S. Effectiveness ofen-masseretraction using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch: treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes. Korean journal of orthodontics . 2014;44(2):88–95. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.88.
    1. Langberg B. J., Todd A. Treatment of a Class I malocclusion with severe bimaxillary protrusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2004;126(6):739–746. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.039.
    1. Kuroda S., Yamada K., Deguchi T., Kyung H.-M., Takano-Yamamoto T. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2009;135(3):302–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.038.
    1. Al-Sibaie S., Hajeer M. Y. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthodontics . 2014;36(3):275–283. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046.
    1. Khlef H. N., Hajeer M. Y., Ajaj M. A., Heshmeh O. Evaluation of treatment outcomes of en masse retraction with temporary skeletal anchorage devices in comparison with two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with dentoalveolar protrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry . 2018;9(4):513–523.
    1. Graber T. M., Vanarsdall R. L., Jr., Vig K. W. Orthodontics. Current Principles and Techniques . St Louis, MI, USA: University of Michigan; 1994.
    1. Ali F. A., Salman L. H. Acceleration of canine movement by laser assisted flapless corticotomy an innovative approach in clinical orthodontics. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry . 2014;26(3):133–137.
    1. Khlef H. N., Hajeer M. Y., Ajaj M. A., Heshmeh O. En-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth in adult patients with maxillary or bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice . 2019;20(1):113–127.
    1. Alfawal A. M., Hajeer M. Y., Ajaj M. A., Hamadah O., Brad B. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Progress in Orthodontics . 2016;17(1):p. 33. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0146-9.
    1. Alfawal A. M. H., Hajeer M. Y., Ajaj M. A., Hamadah O., Brad B. Evaluation of piezocision and laser-assisted flapless corticotomy in the acceleration of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial. Head & Face Medicine . 2018;14(1):4–12. doi: 10.1186/s13005-018-0161-9.
    1. Khlef H. N., Hajeer M. Y., Ajaj M. A., Heshmeh O., Youssef N., Mahaini L. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2020;158(6):e111–e120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.008.
    1. Alexander S. A. Effects of orthodontic attachments on the gingival health of permanent second molars. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 1991;100(4):337–340. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70071-4.
    1. Ericsson I., Thilander B., Lindhe J. Periodontal conditions after orthodontic tooth movements in the dog. Angle Orthodontist . 1978;48(3):210–218. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1978)048<0210:PCAOTM>;2.
    1. Aboul-Ela S. M. B. E.-D., El-Beialy A. R., El-Sayed K. M. F., Selim E. M. N., El-Mangoury N. H., Mostafa Y. A. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2011;139(2):252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.028.
    1. Abed S. S., Al-Bustani A. I. Corticotomy assisted orthodontic canine retraction. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry . 2013;25(1):160–166. doi: 10.12816/0015134.
    1. Cassetta M., Giansanti M., Di Mambro A., Calasso S., Barbato E. Minimally invasive corticotomy in orthodontics using a three-dimensional printed CAD/CAM surgical guide. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery . 2016;45(9):1059–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.04.017.
    1. Charavet C., Lecloux G., Bruwier A., et al. Localized piezoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults. Journal of Dental Research . 2016;95(9):1003–1009. doi: 10.1177/0022034516645066.
    1. Aksakalli S., Calik B., Kara B., Ezirganli S. Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist . 2016;86(1):59–65. doi: 10.2319/012215-49.1.
    1. Moon C.-H., Wee J.-U., Lee H.-S. Intrusion of overerupted molars by corticotomy and orthodontic skeletal anchorage. Angle Orthodontist . 2007;77(6):1119–1125. doi: 10.2319/092705-334.1.
    1. Wilcko W. M., Wilcko T., Bouquot J. E., Ferguson D. J. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry . 2001;21(1):9–19.
    1. Generson R. M., Porter J. M., Zell A., Stratigos G. T. Combined surgical and orthodontic management of anterior open bite using corticotomy. Journal of Oral Surgery . 1978;36(3):216–219.
    1. Abbas N. H., Sabet N. E., Hassan I. T. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2016;149(4):473–480. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.029.
    1. Bass C. C. The problem of dental health. Bulletin of the Tulane Medical Faculty . 1954;13(3)
    1. Sebaoun J.-D. M., Surmenian J., Dibart S. Traitements orthodontiques accélérés par piézocision : une alternative mini-invasive aux corticotomies alvéolaires. L’Orthodontie Française . 2011;82(4):311–319. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2011142.
    1. Al Imam G., Ajaj M. A., Hajeer M. Y., Al-Mdalal Y., Almashaal E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy in the retraction of four upper incisors: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Dental and medical problems . 2019;56(4):385–394. doi: 10.17219/dmp/110432.
    1. Silness J., Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica . 1964;22(1):121–135. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968.
    1. Löe H., Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica . 1963;21(6):533–551. doi: 10.3109/00016356309011240.
    1. Mühlemann H. R. Psychological and chemical mediators of gingival health. Revue D’odonto-stomatologie . 1977;6(5):352–357.
    1. Miller P. D., Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry . 1985;5(2):8–13.
    1. Sakthi S. V., Vikraman B., Shobana V. R., Iyer S. K., Krishnaswamy N. R. Corticotomy-assisted retraction: an outcome assessment. Indian Journal of Dental Research . 2014;25(6):748–54. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.152191.
    1. Tunçer N. İ., Arman-Özçırpıcı A., Oduncuoğlu B. F., Göçmen J. S., Kantarcı A. Efficiency of piezosurgery technique in miniscrew supported en-masse retraction: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthodontics . 2017;39(6):586–594. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx015.
    1. Vercellotti T. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery. Minerva Stomatologica . 2004;53(5):207–214.
    1. Hoggan B. R., Sadowsky C. The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2001;119(5):482–488. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113001.
    1. Liu Y. H., Ding W. H., Liu J., Li Q. Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation . 2009;36(9):687–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01976.x.
    1. Cornelis M. A., De Clerck H. J. Maxillary molar distalization with miniplates assessed on digital models: a prospective clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2007;132(3):373–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.031.
    1. Anuwongnukroh N., Dechkunakorn S., Kunakornporamut K., Tua-Ngam P. Dental arch changes in postretention in Class II division 1 extraction cases. International Orthodontics . 2017;15(2):208–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2017.03.005.
    1. Pandis N., Vlahopoulos K., Madianos P., Eliades T. Long-term periodontal status of patients with mandibular lingual fixed retention. European Journal of Orthodontics . 2007;29(5):471–476. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm042.
    1. Davies T. M., Shaw W. C., Worthington H. V., Addy M., Dummer P., Kingdon A. The effect of orthodontic treatment on plaque and gingivitis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 1991;99(2):155–161. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70118-g.
    1. Melsen B., Allais D. Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics . 2005;127(5):552–561. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.026.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren