A randomized, phase 2 study of deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitor, TAS-114, in combination with S-1 versus S-1 alone in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Hidetoshi Hayashi, David Planchard, Teresa Morán, Vanesa Gregorc, Jonathan Dowell, Hiroshi Sakai, Kiyotaka Yoh, Makoto Nishio, Alexis B Cortot, Karim A Benhadji, Nital Soni, Jinhong Huang, Lukas Makris, Susana Cedres, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Hidetoshi Hayashi, David Planchard, Teresa Morán, Vanesa Gregorc, Jonathan Dowell, Hiroshi Sakai, Kiyotaka Yoh, Makoto Nishio, Alexis B Cortot, Karim A Benhadji, Nital Soni, Jinhong Huang, Lukas Makris, Susana Cedres

Abstract

Introduction TAS-114 is a potent inhibitor of deoxyuridine triphosphatase, which is a gatekeeper protein preventing uracil and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) misincorporation into DNA. TAS-114 has been suggested to enhance the antitumor activity of 5-FU. This randomized, phase 2 study investigated TAS-114 plus S-1 (TAS-114/S-1) vs. S-1 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC, previously treated with ≥ 2 regimens, were randomized 1:1 to receive TAS-114 (400 mg)/S-1 (30 mg/m2) or S-1 (30 mg/m2). Progression-free survival (PFS, independent central review) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Results In total, 127 patients received treatment. Median PFS was 3.65 and 4.17 months in the TAS-114/S-1 and S-1 groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.88; P = 0.2744). DCR was similar between groups (TAS-114/S-1 80.3%, S-1 75.9%) and median OS was 7.92 and 9.82 months for the TAS-114/S-1 and S-1 groups, respectively (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.80-2.14; P = 0.1431). The ORR was higher in the TAS-114/S-1 group than the S-1 group (19.7% vs. 10.3%), and more patients with tumor shrinkage were observed in the TAS-114/S-1 group. Incidence rates of anemia, skin toxicities, and Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were higher in the TAS-114/S-1 group compared with the monotherapy group. Conclusions Although the TAS-114/S-1 combination improved the response rate, this did not translate into improvements in PFS. Clinical Trial Registration No. NCT02855125 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on 4 August 2016.

Keywords: 5-fluorouracil; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Progression-free survival; dUTPase.

Conflict of interest statement

N. Yamamoto has received grants and/or personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical. H. Hayashi has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. D. Planchard has participated in consulting, acted in an advisory role, and received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, prIME Oncology, and Peer CME, and has worked as a principal or co-investigator for clinical trial research for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Novocure, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. H. Sakai has received personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical. K. Yoh has received grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. M. Nishio has received grants and/or non-financial support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche and grants and/or personal fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sankyo Healthcare, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. A. Cortot has received grants, personal fees, and/or non-financial support from Astra-Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. KA Benhadji and N. Soni are employees of Taiho Oncology Inc. J. Huang is an employee of Taiho Pharmaceutical and owns Taiho Pharmaceutical stock. L. Makris has received personal fees from Taiho Oncology, Inc. S. Cedres has served in a consulting or an advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD Oncology, and Amphera; and has received travel and accommodation funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. T. Morán, V. Gregorc, and J. Dowell have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Progression-free survival by ICR (intent-to-treat population), (b) forest plot of hazard ratios for treatment effect on progression-free survival (ICR). ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HR, hazard ratio; ICR, independent central review; ROS1, ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Individual tumor shrinkage and progression-free survival (independent central review) in the (a) TAS-114/S-1 group and (b) S-1 group

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492.
    1. Barnet MB, Cooper WA, Boyer MJ, Kao S (2018) Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: shifting prognostic paradigms. J Clin Med 7(6):151. 10.3390/jcm7060151
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Non-small cell lung cancer. Version 2.2018. . Accessed 1 Aug 2019
    1. Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, Novello S, Smit EF, Faivre-Finn C, Mok TS, Reck M, Van Schil PE, Hellmann MD, Peters S (2019) Correction to: “Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up”. Ann Oncol 30(5):863–870. 10.1093/annonc/mdy474
    1. Takeda K. Clinical development of S-1 for non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese perspective. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2013;5(5):301–311. doi: 10.1177/1758834013500702.
    1. Nokihara H, Lu S, Mok TSK, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto N, Shi YK, Zhang L, Soo RA, Yang JC, Sugawara S, Nishio M, Takahashi T, Goto K, Chang J, Maemondo M, Ichinose Y, Cheng Y, Lim WT, Morita S, Tamura T. Randomized controlled trial of S-1 versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (East Asia S-1 Trial in Lung Cancer) Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2698–2706. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx419.
    1. Saito K, Nagashima H, Noguchi K, Yoshisue K, Yokogawa T, Matsushima E, Tahara T, Takagi S. First-in-human, phase I dose-escalation study of single and multiple doses of a first-in-class enhancer of fluoropyrimidines, a dUTPase inhibitor (TAS-114) in healthy male volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;73(3):577–583. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2383-2.
    1. Yano W, Yokogawa T, Wakasa T, Yamamura K, Fujioka A, Yoshisue K, Matsushima E, Miyahara S, Miyakoshi H, Taguchi J, Chong KT, Takao Y, Fukuoka M, Matsuo K (2018) TAS-114, a first-in-class dual dUTPase/DPD inhibitor, demonstrates potential to improve therapeutic efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther 17(8):1683–1693. 10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-17-0911
    1. Doi T, Yoh K, Shitara K, Takahashi H, Ueno M, Kobayashi S, Morimoto M, Okusaka T, Ueno H, Morizane C, Okano N, Nagashima F, Furuse J. First-in-human phase 1 study of novel dUTPase inhibitor TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2019;37(3):507–518. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0697-3.
    1. Fasolo A, Aoyama T, Stathis A et al. A large phase I study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2018; 14–18 April 2018; Chicago, IL. Abstract #CT014.
    1. Govindan R, Morgensztern D, Kommor MD, Herbst RS, Schaefer P, Gandhi J, Saito K, Zergebel C, Schiller J. Phase II trial of S-1 as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(4):790–795. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182103b51.
    1. Ono A, Naito T, Murakami H, Takahashi T, Nakamura Y, Tsuya A, Kaira K, Igawa S, Shukuya T, Tamiya A, Kaira R, Endo M, Yamamoto N. Evaluation of S-1 as third- or further-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2010;15(2):161–165. doi: 10.1007/s10147-010-0034-0.
    1. Miyoshi S, Ito R, Katayama H, Kadowaki T, Yano S, Watanabe A, Abe M, Hamada H, Okura T, Higaki J. Phase II trial of S-1 as third-line or further chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(6):1005–1010. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0663-9.
    1. Dodd LE, Korn EL, Freidlin B, Jaffe CC, Rubinstein LV, Dancey J, Mooney MM. Blinded independent central review of progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials: important design element or unnecessary expense? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(22):3791–3796. doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.16.1711.
    1. Simmons CP, Koinis F, Fallon MT, Fearon KC, Bowden J, Solheim TS, Gronberg BH, McMillan DC, Gioulbasanis I, Laird BJ. Prognosis in advanced lung cancer–A prospective study examining key clinicopathological factors. Lung Cancer. 2015;88(3):304–309. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.03.020.
    1. Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H, Horio Y, Hida T, Mori S, Hatooka S, Shinoda M, Takahashi T, Yatabe Y. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(11):2513–2520. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.00.992.
    1. Gandara DR, Grimminger P, Mack PC, Lara PN, Jr, Li T, Danenberg PV, Danenberg KD. Association of epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutations with low ERCC1 gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(12):1933–1938. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181fd418d.
    1. Pfaffle HN, Wang M, Gheorghiu L, Ferraiolo N, Greninger P, Borgmann K, Settleman J, Benes CH, Sequist LV, Zou L, Willers H. EGFR-activating mutations correlate with a Fanconi anemia-like cellular phenotype that includes PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Cancer Res. 2013;73(20):6254–6263. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-13-0044.
    1. Tsukioka S, Yano W, Yokogawa T et al. Expression of DNA damage repair enzymes determine the efficacy of a novel dUTPase inhibitor, TAS-114. Presented at the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA, 19–23 October 2013.
    1. Zhou JX, Feng LJ, Zhang X. Risk of severe hematologic toxicities in cancer patients treated with PARP inhibitors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:3009–3017. doi: 10.2147/dddt.S147726.
    1. Suenaga M, Schirripa M, Cao S, Zhang W, Yang D, Murgioni S, Rossini D, Marmorino F, Mennitto A, Ning Y, Okazaki S, Berger MD, Miyamoto Y, Gopez R, Jr, Barzi A, Yamaguchi T, Loupakis F, Lenz HJ. Genetic variants of DNA repair-related genes predict efficacy of TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(5):1015–1022. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx035.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren