Impact of positive family history and genetic risk variants on the incidence of diabetes: the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study

Matti I Uusitupa, Alena Stancáková, Markku Peltonen, Johan G Eriksson, Jaana Lindström, Sirkka Aunola, Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka, Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Markku Laakso, Matti I Uusitupa, Alena Stancáková, Markku Peltonen, Johan G Eriksson, Jaana Lindström, Sirkka Aunola, Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka, Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Markku Laakso

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the influence of positive family history (FH+) of diabetes and 19 known genetic risk loci on the effectiveness of lifestyle changes and their predictive value on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS).

Research design and methods: A total of 522 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were randomized into the control (n = 257) and intervention (n = 265) groups. The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (median 7 years), and the lifestyle intervention, aimed at weight reduction, healthy diet, and increased physical activity, lasted for 4 years (range 1-6 years). An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and assessment of basic clinical variables were performed annually.

Results: The effect of intervention on the incidence of diabetes was almost similar in subjects with FH+ compared with subjects with a negative family history (FH-) of diabetes during the entire follow-up. In the Cox model, including FH, genetic risk SNPs, and randomization group, and adjusted for the effects of age, sex, BMI, and study center, only lifestyle intervention had a significant effect (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.75, P < 0.001) on the incidence of diabetes. Further analyses showed that in addition to the baseline glucose and insulin values, 1-year changes in 2-h glucose and 2-h insulin achieved by lifestyle intervention had a significant effect on the incidence of diabetes.

Conclusions: These results emphasize the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in reducing the risk of diabetes in high-risk individuals independently of genetic or familial risk of type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00518167.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of type 2 diabetes during the intervention period of 4 years (A) (end indicated by a vertical line) and during the entire follow-up period (B) by FH and randomization group (intervention vs. control) in the DPS. Solid line is for the control group. During the intervention follow-up of 4 years on average, intervention had significant effect on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the FH+ group (P = 0.0002, *P = 0.0008) but not in the FH- group (P = 0.61, *P = 0.11). During the entire follow-up, intervention had an effect in both FH+ (P = 0.0004, *P = 0.002) and FH− (P = 0.13, *P = 0.006) groups. P is from Kaplan–Meier analysis, *P after adjustment for age, sex, baseline BMI, baseline fasting glucose, and study center in Cox regression model.

References

    1. McCarthy MI, Zeggini E. Genome-wide association studies in type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2009;9:164–171
    1. Grant RW, Hivert M, Pandiscio JC, Florez JC, Nathan DM, Meigs JB. The clinical application of genetic testing in type 2 diabetes: a patient and physician survey. Diabetologia 2009;52:2299–2305
    1. Voight BF, Scott LJ, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. MAGIC Investigators. GIANT Consortium Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci identified through large-scale association analysis. Nat Genet 2010;42:579–589
    1. Lyssenko V, Jonsson A, Almgren P, et al. Clinical risk factors, DNA variants, and the development of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2220–2232
    1. Meigs JB, Shrader P, Sullivan LM, et al. Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2208–2219
    1. Cornelis MC, Qi L, Zhang C, et al. Joint effects of common genetic variants on the risk for type 2 diabetes in U.S. men and women of European ancestry. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:541–550
    1. Uusitupa M. Gene-diet interaction in relation to the prevention of obesity and type 2 diabetes: evidence from the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2005;15:225–233
    1. Weyrich P, Stefan N, Häring HU, Laakso M, Fritsche A. Effect of genotype on success of lifestyle intervention in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. J Mol Med 2007;85:107–117
    1. Florez JC, Jablonski KA, Bayley N, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group TCF7L2 polymorphisms and progression to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. N Engl J Med 2006;355:241–250
    1. Wang J, Kuusisto J, Vänttinen M, et al. Variants of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene predict conversion to type 2 diabetes in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and are associated with impaired glucose regulation and impaired insulin secretion. Diabetologia 2007;50:1192–1200
    1. Kaprio J, Tuomilehto J, Koskenvuo M, et al. Concordance for type 1 (insulin-dependent) and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort of twins in Finland. Diabetologia 1992;35:1060–1067
    1. Lyssenko V, Almgren P, Anevski D, et al. Botnia study group Predictors of and longitudinal changes in insulin sensitivity and secretion preceding onset of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54:166–174
    1. Hilding A, Eriksson AK, Agardh EE, et al. The impact of family history of diabetes and lifestyle factors on abnormal glucose regulation in middle-aged Swedish men and women. Diabetologia 2006;49:2589–2598
    1. Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Familial risks for type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Diabetes Care 2010;33:293–297
    1. Moore AF, Jablonski KA, McAteer JB, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Extension of type 2 diabetes genome-wide association scan results in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes 2008;57:2503–2510
    1. Eriksson J, Lindström J, Valle T, et al. Prevention of type II diabetes in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: the Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS) in Finland. Study design and 1-year interim report on the feasibility of the lifestyle intervention programme. Diabetologia 1999;42:793–801
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, et al. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1343–1350
    1. Lindström J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, et al. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet 2006;368:1673–1679
    1. Uusitupa M, Peltonen M, Lindström J, et al. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group Ten-year mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study—secondary analysis of the randomized trial. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e5656.
    1. Stancáková A, Kuulasmaa T, Paananen J, et al. Association of 18 confirmed susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes with indices of insulin release, proinsulin conversion, and insulin sensitivity in 5,327 nondiabetic Finnish men. Diabetes 2009;58:2129–2136
    1. Baptiste-Roberts K, Gary TL, Beckles GL, et al. Family history of diabetes, awareness of risk factors, and health behaviors among African Americans. Am J Public Health 2007;97:907–912
    1. Florez JC. Clinical review: the genetics of type 2 diabetes: a realistic appraisal in 2008. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:4633–4642
    1. Uusitupa M, Lindi V, Louheranta A, Salopuro T, Lindström J, Tuomilehto J, Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group Long-term improvement in insulin sensitivity by changing lifestyles of people with impaired glucose tolerance: 4-year results from the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes 2003;52:2532–2538
    1. Mari A, Tura A, Natali A, et al. RISC Investigators Impaired beta cell glucose sensitivity rather than inadequate compensation for insulin resistance is the dominant defect in glucose intolerance. Diabetologia 2010;53:749–756

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren