EPISYNC study: predictors of patient-ventilator asynchrony in a prospective cohort of patients under invasive mechanical ventilation - study protocol

Mayson Laercio de Araujo Sousa, Rudys Magrans, Fátima K Hayashi, Lluis Blanch, R M Kacmarek, Juliana C Ferreira, Mayson Laercio de Araujo Sousa, Rudys Magrans, Fátima K Hayashi, Lluis Blanch, R M Kacmarek, Juliana C Ferreira

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common during the entire period of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. However, risk factors associated with asynchrony are not completely understood. The main objectives of this study are to estimate the incidence of asynchrony during invasive MV and its association with respiratory mechanics and other baseline patient characteristics.

Methods and analysis: We designed a prospective cohort study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. Inclusion criteria are adult patients under invasive MV initiated for less than 72 hours, and with expectation of remaining under MV for more than 24 hours. Exclusion criteria are high flow bronchopleural fistula, inability to measure respiratory mechanics and previous tracheostomy. Baseline assessment includes clinical characteristics of patients at ICU admission, including severity of illness, reason for initiation of MV, and measurement of static mechanics of the respiratory system. We will capture ventilator waveforms during the entire MV period that will be analysed with dedicated software (Better Care, Barcelona, Spain), which automatically identifies several types of asynchrony and calculates the asynchrony index (AI). We will use a linear regression model to identify risk factors associated with AI. To assess the relationship between survival and AI we will use Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank tests and Cox regression. The calculated sample size is 103 patients. The statistical analysis will be performed by the software R Programming (www.R-project.org) and will be considered statistically significant if the p value is less than 0.05.

Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Instituto do Coração, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil, and informed consent was waived due to the observational nature of the study. We aim to disseminate the study findings through peer-reviewed publications and national and international conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT02687802; Pre-results.

Keywords: automatic algorithms; mechanical ventilation; patient-ventilator asynchrony; respiratory mechanics.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RMK reports grants and personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Orange Medical, grants from Venner Medical, outside the submitted work. LB is inventor of one Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí owned US patent: ‘Method and system for managed related patient parameters provided by a monitoring device,’ US Patent No. 12/538,940, founder of BetterCare S.L. which is a research and development company, start up of Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí. JCF reports grants from FAPESP (Brazilian funding agency), during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of EPISYNC protocol. ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of asynchrony events detected by Better Care. INSP, inspiratory; PAW, airway pressure; RESP, respiratory; VT, tidal volume.

References

    1. Sassoon CS, Foster GT. Patient-ventilator asynchrony. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001;7:28–33. 10.1097/00075198-200102000-00005
    1. Thille AW, Brochard L. Promoting Patient-Ventilator Synchrony. Clin Pulm Med 2007;14:350–9. 10.1097/CPM.0b013e31815b1234
    1. Chao DC, Scheinhorn DJ, Stearn-Hassenpflug M. Patient-ventilator trigger asynchrony in prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest 1997;112:1592–9. 10.1378/chest.112.6.1592
    1. Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, et al. . Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:1515–22. 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8
    1. de Wit M, Miller KB, Green DA, et al. . Ineffective triggering predicts increased duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2740–5.
    1. Blanch L, Villagra A, Sales B, et al. . Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality. Intensive Care Med 2015;41:633–41. 10.1007/s00134-015-3692-6
    1. Ferreira JC, Diniz-Silva F, Moriya HT, et al. . Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) during spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a crossover trial. BMC Pulm Med 2017;17:139 10.1186/s12890-017-0484-5
    1. Branson RD, Blakeman TC, Robinson BR. Asynchrony and dyspnea. Respir Care 2013;58:973–89. 10.4187/respcare.02507
    1. Nava S, Bruschi C, Fracchia C, et al. . Patient-ventilator interaction and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in patients with different pathologies. Eur Respir J 1997;10:177–83. 10.1183/09031936.97.10010177
    1. Leung P, Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Comparison of assisted ventilator modes on triggering, patient effort, and dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1940–8. 10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196100
    1. Parthasarathy S, Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Cycling of inspiratory and expiratory muscle groups with the ventilator in airflow limitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1471–8. 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9802014
    1. Jolliet P, Tassaux D. Clinical review: patient-ventilator interaction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit Care 2006;10:236 10.1186/cc5073
    1. Colombo D, Cammarota G, Alemani M, et al. . Efficacy of ventilator waveforms observation in detecting patient-ventilator asynchrony. Crit Care Med 2011;39:2452–7. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318225753c
    1. Chacón E, Estruga A, Murias G, et al. . Nurses' detection of ineffective inspiratory efforts during mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care 2012;21:e89–93. 10.4037/ajcc2012108
    1. Ramirez II, Arellano DH, Adasme RS, et al. . Ability of ICU Health-Care Professionals to identify patient-ventilator asynchrony using waveform analysis. Respir Care 2017;62:144–9. 10.4187/respcare.04750
    1. Blanch L, Sales B, Montanya J, et al. . Validation of the Better Care® system to detect ineffective efforts during expiration in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot study. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:772–80. 10.1007/s00134-012-2493-4
    1. Murias G, Montanyà J, Chacón E, et al. . Automatic detection of ventilatory modes during invasive mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2016;20:1–7. 10.1186/s13054-016-1436-9
    1. Vaporidi K, Babalis D, Chytas A, et al. . Clusters of ineffective efforts during mechanical ventilation: impact on outcome. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:184–91. 10.1007/s00134-016-4593-z
    1. de Haro C, López-Aguilar J, Magrans R, et al. . Double cycling during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2018;46:1385–92. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003256
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344–9. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
    1. Azevedo LC, Park M, Salluh JI, et al. . Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Crit Care 2013;17:R63 10.1186/cc12594
    1. Pierson DJ. Patient-ventilator interaction. Respir Care 2011;56:214–28. 10.4187/respcare.01115

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren