A Fixed Ratio Combination of Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide (IDegLira) Reduces Glycemic Fluctuation and Brings More Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Within Blood Glucose Target Ranges

Allen B King, Athena Philis-Tsimikas, Eric S Kilpatrick, Irene H Langbakke, Kamilla Begtrup, Tina Vilsbøll, Allen B King, Athena Philis-Tsimikas, Eric S Kilpatrick, Irene H Langbakke, Kamilla Begtrup, Tina Vilsbøll

Abstract

Background: Reducing glycemic fluctuation is important for optimal diabetes management. This post hoc analysis examined glycemic fluctuations and the proportion of subjects achieving recommended blood glucose targets with the fixed ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared to insulin degludec (IDeg) and liraglutide alone.

Methods: We analyzed nine-point self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) profiles from two randomized trials involving IDegLira in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from a subset of patients in one of these trials to assess glycemic fluctuation and day-to-day variability.

Results: Compared with IDeg, IDegLira resulted in a greater proportion of subjects with SMBG values within target ranges (3.9-9.0 mmol/L) than IDeg for all pre- and postprandial values, and for the full nine-point profile (P < 0.05 for all). IDegLira also resulted in a greater reduction in the range of SMBG values over 24 h than IDeg (P ≤ 0.0001). CGM data showed that IDegLira provided greater reductions in interstitial glucose (IG) fluctuation (P = 0.0018) and postprandial IG increment (P = 0.0288) compared with IDeg. Compared with liraglutide, IDegLira brought a higher proportion of subjects within SMBG target ranges (all pre- and all postprandial values, and the full nine-point profile, P < 0.01 for all) and resulted in a greater reduction of time outside the IG target range (P = 0.0072). IDegLira also reduced mean IG more than liraglutide (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Treatment with IDegLira allows more patients with T2D to maintain blood glucose within target ranges throughout the day than either IDeg or liraglutide alone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01336023 NCT01392573.

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; GLP-1 analog; Insulin degludec; Liraglutide; Type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

A.B.K. has received research support from Sanofi, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Animas, Takeda, and Amylin, speaker fees from Sanofi, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Animas, Takeda, Janssen, Lifescan, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amylin, and he has acted as a consultant to Sanofi, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Animas, Takeda, Janssen, and Lifescan. A.P.-T. has served on behalf of her organization on advisory panels for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Merck and Co., and Sanofi-Aventis, and she has received research support from Mylan, Lexicon, DexCom, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly and Company, and AstraZeneca LP. AP-T does not receive any personal reimbursement for these functions. E.S.K. has served on advisory panels for Novo Nordisk and Pfizer. K.B. and I.H.L. are full-time employees of, and own stock at, Novo Nordisk A/S. T.V. has received lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Sanofi, and Zealand Pharma, and has been an advisory-board member for Amgen, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda, and Bristol-Myers Squibb/AstraZeneca.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Nine-point SMBG† profile‡ showing calculation of range (a) and change from baseline to EOT in DUAL I and DUAL II (b). †SMBG assessed with glucose meter as plasma equivalent values of capillary whole blood glucose. ‡Illustrative example not intended to represent actual patients or treatment effects. Data are based on FAS, with LOCF for all subjects with a full nine-point profile at baseline; P-values are from ANCOVA with treatment, region, baseline HbA1c stratum (≤8.3% [≤67 mmol/mol], >8.3% [>67 mmol/mol]), and previous OAD treatment as fixed effects, and baseline value of the parameter included as covariate. ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; EOT, end-of-trial; ETD, estimated treatment difference; FAS, full analysis set; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; IDeg, insulin degludec; IDegLira, fixed ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide; Lira, liraglutide; LOCF, last observation carried forward; OAD, oral antidiabetic drug; NS, not significant; SMBG, self-monitored blood glucose.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Time (%) above (IG ≥9.0 mmol/L), within (3.9≤ IG 1c stratum (≤8.3% [≤67 mmol/mol], >8.3% [>67 mmol/mol]) and previous OAD treatment as fixed effects for both methods. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; CI, confidence interval; IG, interstitial glucose; Lira, liraglutide; SD, standard deviation.

References

    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. : Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:140–149
    1. Zenari L, Marangoni A: What are the preferred strategies for control of glycaemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus? Diabetes Obes Metab 2013;15(Suppl. 2):17–25
    1. Chon S, Lee YJ, Fraterrigo G, et al. : Evaluation of glycemic variability in well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013;15:455–460
    1. International Diabetes Federation: 2011 Guideline for the Management of PostMeal Glucose in Diabetes. Brussels: IDF; 2011. (accessed March62017)
    1. Nalysnyk L, Hernandez-Medina M, Krishnarajah G: Glycaemic variability and complications in patients with diabetes mellitus: evidence from a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Obes Metab 2010;12:288–298
    1. Qu Y, Jacober SJ, Zhang Q, et al. : Rate of hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes can be predicted from glycemic variability data. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:1008–1012
    1. Cavalot F, Petrelli A, Traversa M, et al. : Postprandial blood glucose is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly in women: lessons from the San Luigi Gonzaga Diabetes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:813–819
    1. DECODE Study Group. Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:397–405
    1. Nakagami T, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, et al. : Screen-detected diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia as predictors of cardiovascular mortality in five populations of Asian origin: the DECODA study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006;13:555–561
    1. Hirsch IB: Glycemic variability and diabetes complications: does it matter? Of course it does! Diabetes Care 2015;38:1610–1614
    1. Bergenstal RM: Glycemic variability and diabetes complications: does it matter? Simply put, there are better glycemic markers! Diabetes Care 2015;38:1615–1621
    1. Eng C, Kramer CK, Zinman B, Retnakaran R: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combination treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2014;384:2228–2234
    1. Buse JB, Vilsboll T, Thurman J, et al. : Contribution of liraglutide in the fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira). Diabetes Care 2014;37:2926–2933
    1. Gough SC, Bode B, Woo V, et al. : Efficacy and safety of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with its components given alone: results of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, 26-week, treat-to-target trial in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014;2:885–893
    1. Gough SC, Bode BW, Woo VC, et al. : One-year efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 26-week extension to a 26-week main trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:965–973
    1. Zinman B, Philis-Tsimikas A, Cariou B, et al. : Insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a 1-year, randomized, treat-to-target trial (BEGIN Once Long). Diabetes Care 2012;35:2464–2471
    1. Buse JB, Rosenstock J, Sesti G, et al. : Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6). Lancet 2009;374:39–47
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Last amended by the 59th WMA Assembly Seoul, October, 2008
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation Working Group. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R1). Geneva International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use June10, 1996 (accessed March6, 2017)
    1. Daenen S, Sola-Gazagnes A, M'Bemba J, et al. : Peak-time determination of post-meal glucose excursions in insulin-treated diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab 2010;36:165–169
    1. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes, 2014. Diabetes Care 2014;37:S14–S80
    1. Holst JJ, Buse JB, Rodbard HW, et al. : IDegLira improves both fasting and postprandial glucose control as demonstrated using continuous glucose monitoring and a standardized meal test. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015;10:389–397
    1. Ceriello A, Kilpatrick ES: Glycemic variability: both sides of the story. Diabetes Care 2013;36:S272–S275
    1. Graveling AJ, Frier BM: Hypoglycaemia: an overview. Primary Care Diabetes 2009;3:131–139
    1. Williams SA, Pollack MF, DiBonaventura M: Effects of hypoglycemia on health-related quality of life, treatment satisfaction and healthcare resource utilization in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;91:363–370
    1. Fritschi C, Quinn L: Fatigue in patients with diabetes: a review. J Psychosom Res 2010;69:33–41
    1. Penckofer S, Quinn L, Byrn M, et al. : Does glycemic variability impact mood and quality of life? Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:303–310
    1. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Chen X, Frias JP: Associations between improved glucose control and patient-reported outcomes after initiation of insulin pump therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:471–476
    1. Ayano-Takahara S, Ikeda K, Fujimoto S, et al. : Glycemic variability is associated with quality of life and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:e1–e2

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren