Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk

Mansoor Husain, Stephen C Bain, Ole K Jeppesen, Ildiko Lingvay, Rasmus Sørrig, Marianne B Treppendahl, Tina Vilsbøll, Mansoor Husain, Stephen C Bain, Ole K Jeppesen, Ildiko Lingvay, Rasmus Sørrig, Marianne B Treppendahl, Tina Vilsbøll

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effects of semaglutide versus comparators on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular [CV] death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] and nonfatal stroke) and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in the SUSTAIN (subcutaneous semaglutide) and PIONEER (oral semaglutide) trials across subgroups of varying CV risk.

Methods: Post hoc analyses of individual patient-level data combined from SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 were performed to assess MACE and HF. MACE were analysed in subjects with and without: established CV disease and/or chronic kidney disease; prior MI or stroke; and prior HF. MACE in the SUSTAIN and PIONEER glycaemic efficacy trials were also assessed.

Results: In SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 combined, the hazard ratio (HR) for effect of semaglutide versus placebo on overall MACE was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62, 0.92), which was mainly driven by the effect on nonfatal stroke (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.43, 0.97]). The HR for hospitalization for HF was 1.03 (95% CI 0.75, 1.40). The HRs for MACE were <1.0 in all subgroups, except for those with prior HF (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.72, 1.57]); P-values for interaction of subgroup on treatment effect were >0.05, except for HF (0.046). In the combined glycaemic efficacy trials, the HR for effect of semaglutide versus comparators on MACE was 0.85 (95% CI 0.55, 1.33).

Conclusions: In SUSTAIN and PIONEER combined, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue semaglutide showed consistent effects on MACE versus comparators across varying CV risk. No effect of semaglutide on MACE was observed in subjects with prior HF.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02054897 NCT01930188 NCT01885208 NCT02128932 NCT02305381 NCT01720446 NCT02906930 NCT02863328 NCT02607865 NCT02863419 NCT02827708 NCT02692716 NCT02849080 NCT03021187 NCT03018028 NCT03015220.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; clinical trial; glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue; phase III study; type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

M.H. discloses personal fees for advisory panel consultancy and speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen Inc.; grants for investigator‐initiated research studies and personal fees for advisory panel consultancy from AstraZeneca and Merck & Co; personal fees for advisory panel consultancy from Roche; and grants for investigator‐initiated preclinical research and personal fees for advisory panel consultancy and speaker honoraria from Novo Nordisk. S.C.B. discloses grants, personal fees and other potential conflicts of interest from Novo Nordisk, and personal fees and other potential conflicts of interest from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Sanofi‐Aventis, all for honoraria, teaching and research sponsorship or grants; also discloses other potential conflicts of interest from Elsevier and Medscape for development of educational programmes, and nonfinancial potential conflicts of interest from the All‐Wales Medicines Strategy Group, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence UK for providing expert advice; and discloses a potential conflict of interest for owning shares in Glycosmedia. O.K.J., R.S. and M.B.T. are full‐time employees of Novo Nordisk; O.K.J. and M.B.T. also report potential conflicts of interest for owning shares in Novo Nordisk. I.L. discloses institutional grant payments from Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Mylan and GI Dynamics; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, TARGETPharma, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jenssen, Mannkind, Valeritas, Intarcia and Sanofi for consultancy. T.V. discloses personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk and Sun Pharma for advisory panels and consultancy.

© 2020 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative incidence plot of time to first occurrence of event adjudication committee‐confirmed three‐component major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular [CV] death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] and nonfatal stroke) with semaglutide versus placebo in SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6. Combined population omitted owing to different trial durations; SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 have already been individually reported.32, 33 Data are “in‐trial”, analysed using Cox proportional hazards models with treatment as categorical fixed factor, stratified by CV risk at screening (established cardiovascular disease [CVD] and/or chronic kidney disease [CKD], or CV risk factors only). †Not prespecified. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OD, once daily; OW, once weekly; s.c., subcutaneous
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to first occurrence of event adjudication committee‐confirmed three‐component major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular [CV] death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] and nonfatal stroke) and its components with semaglutide versus placebo in SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6. SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 have already been individually reported.32, 33 Data are “in‐trial”, analysed using Cox proportional hazards models with treatment as a categorical fixed factor, stratified by trial (SUSTAIN 6 or PIONEER 6) and CV risk at screening (established cardiovascular disease [CVD] and/or chronic kidney disease [CKD], or CV risk factors only). CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to first occurrence of event adjudication committee‐confirmed three‐component major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular [CV] death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] and nonfatal stroke) with semaglutide versus placebo in SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 CV risk subgroups. SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 have already been individually reported.32, 33 Data are “in‐trial”, analysed using Cox proportional hazards models with treatment and subgroup as categorical fixed factors, with interaction term between treatment and subgroup, stratified by trial and CV risk at screening. P‐value: unadjusted interaction test between treatment and subgroups. CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; NYHA, New York Heart Association
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time to first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiovascular [CV] death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] and nonfatal stroke) across the SUSTAIN and PIONEER phase 3a glycaemic efficacy trials. Data are “in‐trial” from SUSTAIN 1–5 and two SUSTAIN JAPAN trials, and PIONEER 1–5, 7–8 and the two PIONEER Japanese trials (9 and 10). Times from randomization to first event adjudication committee‐confirmed MACE analysed using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model with treatment as a categorical fixed factor and stratified by trial. See Tables S2 and S3 for details of comparators. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio

References

    1. Matheus AS, Tannus LR, Cobas RA, Palma CC, Negrato CA, Gomes MB. Impact of diabetes on cardiovascular disease: an update. Int J Hypertens. 2013;2013:653789.
    1. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown‐Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311‐322.
    1. Hernandez AF, Green JB, Janmohamed S, et al. Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double‐blind, randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392:1519‐1529.
    1. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double‐blind, randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:121‐130.
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117‐2128.
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644‐657.
    1. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:347‐357.
    1. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2019;140:e596‐e646.
    1. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre‐diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:255‐323.
    1. Khat DZ, Husain M. Molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2i and GLP‐1RA. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18:45.
    1. Rakipovski G, Rolin B, Nøhr J, et al. The GLP‐1 analogs liraglutide and semaglutide reduce atherosclerosis in apoE‐/‐ and LDLr‐/‐ mice by a mechanism that includes inflammatory pathways. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018;3:844‐857.
    1. Lau J, Bloch P, Schäffer L, et al. Discovery of the once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analogue semaglutide. J Med Chem. 2015;58:7370‐7380.
    1. Buckley ST, Bækdal TA, Vegge A, et al. Transcellular stomach absorption of a derivatized glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaar7047.
    1. Granhall C, Donsmark M, Blicher TM, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of the novel oral human GLP‐1 analogue, oral semaglutide, in healthy subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019;58:781‐791.
    1. Davies M, Pieber TR, Hartoft‐Nielsen ML, Hansen OKH, Jabbour S, Rosenstock J. Effect of oral semaglutide compared with placebo and subcutaneous semaglutide on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1460‐1470.
    1. Sorli C, Harashima SI, Tsoukas GM, et al. Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:251‐260.
    1. Ahrén B, Masmiquel L, Kumar H, et al. Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly semaglutide versus once‐daily sitagliptin as an add‐on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56‐week, double‐blind, phase 3a, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:341‐354.
    1. Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, et al. Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56‐week, open‐label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:258‐266.
    1. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly semaglutide versus once‐daily insulin glargine as add‐on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin‐naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open‐label, parallel‐group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:355‐366.
    1. Rodbard HW, Lingvay I, Reed J, et al. Semaglutide added to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:2291‐2301.
    1. Seino Y, Terauchi Y, Osonoi T, et al. Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly vs sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:378‐388.
    1. Kaku K, Yamada Y, Watada H, et al. Safety and efficacy of once‐weekly semaglutide versus additional oral antidiabetic drugs, in Japanese subjects with inadequately controlled T2D: a randomised trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1202‐1212.
    1. Aroda VR, Rosenstock J, Terauchi Y, et al. PIONEER 1: randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide monotherapy with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1724‐1732.
    1. Rodbard HW, Rosenstock J, Canani LH, et al. Oral semaglutide vs empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin: the PIONEER 2 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:2272‐2281.
    1. Rosenstock J, Allison D, Birkenfeld AL, et al. Effect of additional oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin on glycated hemoglobin in adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin alone or with sulfonylurea: the PIONEER 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1466‐1480.
    1. Pratley R, Amod A, Hoff ST, et al. Oral semaglutide versus subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 4): a randomised, double‐blind, phase 3a trial. Lancet. 2019;394:39‐50.
    1. Mosenzon O, Blicher TM, Rosenlund S, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment (PIONEER 5): a placebo‐controlled, randomised, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:515‐527.
    1. Pieber TR, Bode B, Mertens A, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide with flexible dose adjustment versus sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 7): a multicentre, open‐label, randomised, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:528‐539.
    1. Zinman B, Aroda VR, Buse JB, et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide versus placebo added to insulin ± metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PIONEER 8 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:2262‐2271.
    1. Yamada Y, Katagiri H, Hamamoto Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide monotherapy vs placebo or liraglutide in Japanese T2D patients: PIONEER 9 trial. Paper presented at: Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes, February 7–9, 2019; Osaka, Japan.
    1. Yabe D, Nakamura J, Kaneto H, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral semaglutide vs dulaglutide in Japanese T2D patient: the PIONEER 10 trial. Paper presented at: Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes, February 7–9, 2019; Osaka, Japan.
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834‐1844.
    1. Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, et al. Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:841‐851.
    1. Overgaard RV, Navarria A, Hertz CL, Ingwersen SH. Similar efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability versus exposure for oral and subcutaneous semaglutide. Presentation at the 55th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, Barcelona, Spain, September 16–20, 2019.
    1. Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ, et al. Effects of once‐weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1228‐1239.
    1. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R, et al. Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2247‐2257.
    1. Verma S, Poulter NR, Bhatt DL, et al. Effects of liraglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Circulation. 2018;138:2884‐2894.
    1. Verma S, Bhatt DL, Bain SC, et al. Effect of liraglutide on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and polyvascular disease: results of the LEADER trial. Circulation. 2018;137:2179‐2183.
    1. Husain M, Bain SC, Mann JFE, et al. No increased risk of heart failure hospitalization of major cardiovascular events observed with liraglutide in patients with or without a history of heart failure – results from the LEADER trial. Paper presented at: American College of Cardiology, March 10–12, 2018; Orlando, FL.
    1. Mentz RJ, Thompson VP, Aguilar D, et al. Effects of once‐weekly exenatide on clinical outcomes in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2018;138:2576‐2578.
    1. Caruso I, Cignarelli A, Giorgino F. Heterogeneity and similarities in GLP‐1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcomes trials. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019;30:578‐589.
    1. Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Jhund PS, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP‐1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;10:776‐785.
    1. Jorsal A, Kistorp C, Holmager P, et al. Effect of liraglutide, a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue, on left ventricular function in stable chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes (LIVE)‐a multicentre, double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:69‐77.
    1. Margulies KB, Hernandez AF, Redfield MM, et al. Effects of liraglutide on clinical stability among patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:500‐508.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren