Rehabilitation and Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Alessandro Picelli, Mirko Filippetti, Lidia Del Piccolo, Federico Schena, Leonardo Chelazzi, Chiara Della Libera, Massimo Donadelli, Valeria Donisi, Paolo Francesco Fabene, Stefania Fochi, Cristina Fonte, Marialuisa Gandolfi, Macarena Gomez-Lira, Elena Locatelli, Giovanni Malerba, Sofia Mariotto, Chiara Milanese, Cristina Patuzzo, Maria Grazia Romanelli, Andrea Sbarbati, Stefano Tamburin, Massimo Venturelli, Paola Zamparo, Alessandra Carcereri de Prati, Elena Butturini, Valentina Varalta, Nicola Smania, Alessandro Picelli, Mirko Filippetti, Lidia Del Piccolo, Federico Schena, Leonardo Chelazzi, Chiara Della Libera, Massimo Donadelli, Valeria Donisi, Paolo Francesco Fabene, Stefania Fochi, Cristina Fonte, Marialuisa Gandolfi, Macarena Gomez-Lira, Elena Locatelli, Giovanni Malerba, Sofia Mariotto, Chiara Milanese, Cristina Patuzzo, Maria Grazia Romanelli, Andrea Sbarbati, Stefano Tamburin, Massimo Venturelli, Paola Zamparo, Alessandra Carcereri de Prati, Elena Butturini, Valentina Varalta, Nicola Smania

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Nonetheless, the care pathway for stroke rehabilitation takes partially into account the needs of chronic patients. This is due in part to the lack of evidence about the mechanisms of recovery after stroke, together with the poor knowledge of related and influencing factors. Here we report on the study protocol "Rehabilitation and Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery," which consists of 7 work-packages and mainly aim to investigate the effects of long-term neurorehabilitation on stroke patients and to define a related profile of (clinical-biological, imaging, neurophysiological, and genetic-molecular) biomarkers of long-term recovery after stroke. The work-package 1 will represent the main part of this protocol and aims to compare the long-term effects of intensive self-rehabilitation vs. usual (rehabilitation) care for stroke. Methods: We planned to include a total of 134 adult subacute stroke patients (no more than 3 months since onset) suffering from multidomain disability as a consequence of first-ever unilateral ischemic stroke. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following groups: intensive self-rehabilitation (based on the principles of "Guided Self-Rehabilitation Contract") vs. usual care (routine practice). Treatment will last 1 year, and patients will be evaluated every 3 months according to their clinical presentation. The following outcomes will be considered in the main work-package: Fugl-Meyer assessment, Cognitive Oxford Screen Barthel Index, structural and functional neuroimaging, cortical excitability, and motor and somatosensory evoked potentials. Discussion: This trial will deal with the effects of an intensive self-management rehabilitation protocol and a related set of biomarkers. It will also investigate the role of training intensity on long-term recovery after stroke. In addition, it will define a set of biomarkers related to post-stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation outcome in order to detect patients with greater potential and define long-term individualized rehabilitation programs. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04323501.

Keywords: clinical neurophysiology; cognition; microRNAs; microbiota; movement; oxidative stress; prognosis; psychology.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Picelli, Filippetti, Del Piccolo, Schena, Chelazzi, Della Libera, Donadelli, Donisi, Fabene, Fochi, Fonte, Gandolfi, Gomez-Lira, Locatelli, Malerba, Mariotto, Milanese, Patuzzo, Romanelli, Sbarbati, Tamburin, Venturelli, Zamparo, Carcereri de Prati, Butturini, Varalta and Smania.

References

    1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2017) 135:e146–603. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000491
    1. Stinear CM. Stroke rehabilitation research needs to be different to make a difference. F1000Research. (2016) 5:1467. 10.12688/f1000research.8722.1
    1. Stinear CM, Byblow WD. Predicting and accelerating motor recovery after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. (2014) 27:624–30. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000153
    1. Pradines M, Baude M, Marciniak C, Francisco G, Gracies JM, Hutin E, et al. . Effect on passive range of motion and functional correlates after a long-term lower limb self-stretch program in patients with chronic spastic paresis. PM R. (2018) 10:1020–31. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.02.013
    1. Marsal C, Gracies JM, Dean C, Mesure S, Bayle N. Beliefs of rehabilitation professionals towards guided self-rehabilitation contracts for post stroke hemiparesis. Top Stroke Rehabil. (2017) 24:608–13. 10.1080/10749357.2017.1373501
    1. Sarfo FS, Ulasavets U, Opare-Sem OK, Ovbiagele B. Tele-Rehabilitation after stroke: an updated systematic review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2018) 27:2306–18. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.013
    1. Cramer SC. Treatments to promote neural repair after stroke. J Stroke. (2018) 20:57–70. 10.5853/jos.2017.02796
    1. Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, Xu W, Liu XN, Ren CC. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2015) 24:2660–8. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.014
    1. Fochi S, Giuriato G, De Simone T, Gomez-Lira M, Tamburin S, Del Piccolo L, et al. . Regulation of microRNAs in satellite cell renewal, muscle function, sarcopenia and the role of exercise. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:E6732. 10.3390/ijms21186732
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. (1975) 12:189–98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
    1. Gracies JM, Vecchio M, Blondel R, Gault-Colas C, Bayle N. Contratto di Autoriabilitazione Guidata Nella Paresi Spastica. Milano: Edi.Ermes; (2014).
    1. Gracies JM, Pradines M, Ghédira M, Loche CM, Mardale V, Hennegrave C, et al. . Guided self-rehabilitation Contract vs conventional therapy in chronic stroke-induced hemiparesis: NEURORESTORE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. (2019) 19:39. 10.1186/s12883-019-1257-y
    1. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. (1993) 73:447–54. 10.1093/ptj/73.7.447
    1. Mancuso M, Varalta V, Sardella L, Capitani D, Zoccolotti P, Antonucci G, et al. . Italian normative data for a stroke specific cognitive screening tool: the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS). Neurol Sci. (2016) 37:1713–21. 10.1007/s10072-016-2650-6
    1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. (1965) 14:61–5. 10.1037/t02366-000
    1. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. (1995) 39:315–25. 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-O
    1. Gandolfi M, Donisi V, Marchioretto F, Battista S, Smania N, Del Piccolo L. A prospective observational cohort study on pharmacological habitus, headache-related disability and psychological profile in patients with chronic migraine undergoing OnabotulinumtoxinA prophylactic treatment. Toxins. (2019) 11:504. 10.3390/toxins11090504
    1. Donisi V, Mazzi MA, Gandolfi M, Deledda G, Marchioretto F, Battista S, et al. Exploring emotional distress, psychological traits and attitudes in patients with chronic migraine undergoing OnabotulinumtoxinA prophylaxis versus withdrawal treatment. Toxins. (2020) 12:577 10.3390/toxins12090577
    1. Derogatis LR, Saviz KL. The SCL-90-R and the brief symptom inventory (BSI) in primary care. In: Maruish ME, editor. Handbook of Psychological Assessment in Primary Care Settings (New York, NY: Routledge; ) (2000) 297–334.
    1. Eysenck HJ, Sybil BG, Eysenck Eysenck personality questionnaire (junior and adult). Br J med Psychol. (1977) 50:203–5. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1977.tb02414.x
    1. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Personality Social Psychol. (1989) 56:267–83. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
    1. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. Windsor: NFER-NELSON; (1995) 35–37.
    1. Rochefort C, Baldwin AS, Chmielewski M. Experiential avoidance: an examination of the construct validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ. Behav Ther. (2018) 49:435–49. 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.008
    1. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Personality Assess. (1988) 52:30–41. 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
    1. Ling Y, Gong T, Zhang J, Gu Q, Gao X, Weng X, et al. . Gut microbiome signatures are biomarkers for cognitive impairment in patients with ischemic stroke. Front Aging Neurosci. (2020) 12:511–62. 10.3389/fnagi.2020.511562
    1. Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther. (2008) 88:652–63. 10.2522/ptj.20070255
    1. Schneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, Schmidt J. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. (2016) 62:182–7. 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.006

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren