An Augmented Reality-Based Guide for Mechanical Ventilator Setup: Prospective Randomized Pilot Trial

Sejin Heo, Suhyeon Moon, Minha Kim, Minsu Park, Won Chul Cha, Meong Hi Son, Sejin Heo, Suhyeon Moon, Minha Kim, Minsu Park, Won Chul Cha, Meong Hi Son

Abstract

Background: Recently, the demand for mechanical ventilation (MV) has increased with the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the conventional approaches to MV training are resource intensive and require on-site training. Consequently, the need for independent learning platforms with remote assistance in institutions without resources has surged.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an augmented reality (AR)-based self-learning platform for novices to set up a ventilator without on-site assistance.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled pilot study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center, Korea, from January to February 2022. Nurses with no prior experience of MV or AR were enrolled. We randomized the participants into 2 groups: manual and AR groups. Participants in the manual group used a printed manual and made a phone call for assistance, whereas participants in the AR group were guided by AR-based instructions and requested assistance with the head-mounted display. We compared the overall score of the procedure, required level of assistance, and user experience between the groups.

Results: In total, 30 participants completed the entire procedure with or without remote assistance. Fewer participants requested assistance in the AR group compared to the manual group (7/15, 47.7% vs 14/15, 93.3%; P=.02). The number of steps that required assistance was also lower in the AR group compared to the manual group (n=13 vs n=33; P=.004). The AR group had a higher rating in predeveloped questions for confidence (median 3, IQR 2.50-4.00 vs median 2, IQR 2.00-3.00; P=.01), suitability of method (median 4, IQR 4.00-5.00 vs median 3, IQR 3.00-3.50; P=.01), and whether they intended to recommend AR systems to others (median 4, IQR 3.00-5.00 vs median 3, IQR 2.00-3.00; P=.002).

Conclusions: AR-based instructions to set up a mechanical ventilator were feasible for novices who had no prior experience with MV or AR. Additionally, participants in the AR group required less assistance compared with those in the manual group, resulting in higher confidence after training.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05446896; https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05446896.

Keywords: augmented reality; critical care; digital health; digital learning; health care professional; learning platform; mechanical ventilation education; medical education; medical training; nurse; nursing; nursing education; virtual education; virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Sejin Heo, Suhyeon Moon, Minha Kim, Minsu Park, Won Chul Cha, Meong Hi Son. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (https://games.jmir.org), 22.07.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scenes from the study: (A) trainee following the instructions with the printed manual; (B) trainee following the augmented reality (AR) instruction with head mounted display (HMD); (C) hologram instruction shown to trainee via HMD; (D) AR direction with hologram (3D object) overlaid on the mechanical ventilator.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effectiveness of augmented reality (AR)–based instruction for ventilator set up; (A) independent learning—the number of participants who requested assistance; (B) independent learning—number of stages that required assistance; (C) user experience.

References

    1. Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 14;330(15):1056–1061. doi: 10.1056/nejm199404143301507.
    1. Wells CR, Fitzpatrick MC, Sah P, Shoukat A, Pandey A, El-Sayed AM, Singer BH, Moghadas SM, Galvani AP. Projecting the demand for ventilators at the peak of the COVID-19 outbreak in the USA. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1123–1125. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30315-7.
    1. Kwon AH, Slocum AH, Varelmann D, Nabzdyk CGS, MIT E-Vent Team Rapidly scalable mechanical ventilator for the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug 25;46(8):1642–1644. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06113-3.10.1007/s00134-020-06113-3
    1. Andellini M, De Santis S, Nocchi F, Bassanelli E, Pecchia L, Ritrovato M. Clinical needs and technical requirements for ventilators for COVID-19 treatment critical patients: an evidence-based comparison for adult and pediatric age. Health Technol. 2020 Jul 30;10(6):1403–1411. doi: 10.1007/s12553-020-00467-w.
    1. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 04;342(18):1301–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
    1. Adiyeke E, Koc BI, Coskun N, Bakan N, Sen E, Turan A, Ozturk H. The impact of a multidisciplinary education program for intensive care unit staff regarding ventilator care bundle on the frequency of ventilator-associated events. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2021;40(4):210–216. doi: 10.1097/dcc.0000000000000484.
    1. Mireles-Cabodevila E, Dugar S. On the need for standard definitions and education to optimize patient-ventilator interactions. Respir Care. 2017 Feb 20;62(2):248–249. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05452. 62/2/248
    1. Mogyoródi Bence, Dunai E, Gál János, Iványi Zsolt. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and the importance of education of ICU nurses on prevention - preliminary results. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2016 Dec;8(4):147–151. doi: 10.1556/1646.8.2016.4.9.
    1. Guilhermino MC, Inder KJ, Sundin D, Kuzmiuk L. Education of ICU nurses regarding invasive mechanical ventilation: findings from a cross-sectional survey. Aust Crit Care. 2014 Aug;27(3):126–32. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.10.064.S1036-7314(13)00257-9
    1. Guilhermino MC, Inder KJ, Sundin D. Education on invasive mechanical ventilation involving intensive care nurses: a systematic review. Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Sep 26;23(5):245–255. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12346.
    1. Pedigo R. Ventilator management of adult patients in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2020 Jul;22(7):1–20.
    1. Haisley KR, Dunst CM, Kizziar P, Swanström LL. Impact of focused hands-on training course on practice adoption of advanced endoscopic techniques and per-oral endoscopic myotomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Mar 01;32(3):251–255. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0029.
    1. Barsom EZ, Graafland M, Schijven MP. Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(10):4174–83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6. 10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6
    1. Barteit S, Lanfermann L, Bärnighausen Till, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C. Augmented, mixed, and virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: systematic review. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Jul 08;9(3):e29080. doi: 10.2196/29080. v9i3e29080
    1. Munzer BW, Khan MM, Shipman B, Mahajan P. Augmented reality in emergency medicine: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 17;21(4):e12368. doi: 10.2196/12368. v21i4e12368
    1. Williams MA, McVeigh J, Handa AI, Lee R. Augmented reality in surgical training: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2020 Sep 30;96(1139):537–542. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137600.postgradmedj-2020-137600
    1. Iqbal H, Tatti F, Rodriguez Y Baena F. Augmented reality in robotic assisted orthopaedic surgery: a pilot study. J Biomed Inform. 2021 Aug;120:103841. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103841.S1532-0464(21)00170-2
    1. Cofano F, Di Perna G, Bozzaro M, Longo A, Marengo N, Zenga F, Zullo N, Cavalieri M, Damiani L, Boges DJ, Agus M, Garbossa D, Calì Corrado. Augmented reality in medical practice: from spine surgery to remote assistance. Front Surg. 2021 Mar 30;8:657901. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.657901. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.657901.
    1. Wolf J, Wolfer V, Halbe M, Maisano F, Lohmeyer Q, Meboldt M. Comparing the effectiveness of augmented reality-based and conventional instructions during single ECMO cannulation training. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Jul 23;16(7):1171–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02408-y. 10.1007/s11548-021-02408-y
    1. Ingrassia PL, Mormando G, Giudici E, Strada F, Carfagna F, Lamberti F, Bottino A. Augmented reality learning environment for basic life support and defibrillation training: usability study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 12;22(5):e14910. doi: 10.2196/14910. v22i5e14910
    1. Azimi E, Winkler A, Tucker E, Qian L, Doswell J, Navab N, Kazanzides P. Can mixed-reality improve the training of medical procedures? Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4065–4068. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513387.
    1. Leary M, McGovern SK, Balian S, Abella BS, Blewer AL. A pilot study of CPR quality comparing an augmented reality application vs a standard audio-visual feedback manikin. Front Digit Health. 2020 Feb 28;2:1. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00001.
    1. Rochlen LR, Levine R, Tait AR. First-person point-of-view-augmented reality for central line insertion training: a usability and feasibility study. Simul Healthc. 2017 Feb;12(1):57–62. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000185.
    1. Azimi E, Winkler A, Tucker E, Qian L, Sharma M, Doswell J, Navab N, Kazanzides P. Evaluation of optical see-through head-mounted displays in training for critical care and trauma. IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces; 18-22 March; Reutlingen, Germany. 2018. Mar 22,
    1. Schrepp M, Hinderks A, Thomaschewski J. Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S) IJIMAI. 2017;4(6):103. doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001.
    1. Santos MEC, Chen A, Taketomi T, Yamamoto G, Miyazaki J, Kato H. Augmented reality learning experiences: survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Trans Learning Technol. 2014 Jan;7(1):38–56. doi: 10.1109/tlt.2013.37.
    1. Helin K, Kuula T, Vizzi C, Karjalainen J, Vovk A. User experience of augmented reality system for astronaut's manual work support. Front Robot AI. 2018 Sep 12;5:106. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00106. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00106.
    1. Wang C, Tsai N, Lu J, Wang MJ. Usability evaluation of an instructional application based on Google Glass for mobile phone disassembly tasks. Appl Ergon. 2019 May;77:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.007.S0003-6870(19)30018-3
    1. Sedlack RE, Petersen BT, Kolars JC. The impact of a hands-on ERCP workshop on clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan;61(1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02456-3.
    1. DiMusto PD, Chen H, Kent KC. Hands-on training in the operating room as a method of continuing education for surgeons in practice. JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 01;151(9):869–70. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1053.2537168
    1. Stovel RG, Gabarin N, Cavalcanti RB, Abrams H. Curricular needs for training telemedicine physicians: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2020 Nov;42(11):1234–1242. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1799959.
    1. Khurrum M, Asmar S, Joseph B. Telemedicine in the ICU: innovation in the critical care process. J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):1377–1384. doi: 10.1177/0885066620968518.
    1. du Toit M, Malau-Aduli B, Vangaveti V, Sabesan S, Ray RA. Use of telehealth in the management of non-critical emergencies in rural or remote emergency departments: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Oct 05;25(1):3–16. doi: 10.1177/1357633x17734239.
    1. Greenberg JA, Schwarz E, Paige J, Dort J, Bachman S. At-home hands-on surgical training during COVID19: proof of concept using a virtual telementoring platform. Surg Endosc. 2021 May 06;35(5):1963–1969. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08470-6. 10.1007/s00464-021-08470-6
    1. Siff L, Mehta N. An interactive holographic curriculum for urogynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;132 Suppl 1:27S–32S. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002860.00006250-201810001-00006
    1. Liang J, Wu S, Tsai C. Nurses' internet self-efficacy and attitudes toward web-based continuing learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Nov 31;31(8):768–73. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.021.S0260-6917(10)00247-9

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren