Insulin pump therapy, multiple daily injections, and cardiovascular mortality in 18,168 people with type 1 diabetes: observational study

Isabelle Steineck, Jan Cederholm, Björn Eliasson, Araz Rawshani, Katarina Eeg-Olofsson, Ann-Marie Svensson, Björn Zethelius, Tarik Avdic, Mona Landin-Olsson, Johan Jendle, Soffia Gudbjörnsdóttir, Swedish National Diabetes Register, Isabelle Steineck, Jan Cederholm, Björn Eliasson, Araz Rawshani, Katarina Eeg-Olofsson, Ann-Marie Svensson, Björn Zethelius, Tarik Avdic, Mona Landin-Olsson, Johan Jendle, Soffia Gudbjörnsdóttir, Swedish National Diabetes Register

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the long term effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (insulin pump therapy) on cardiovascular diseases and mortality in people with type 1 diabetes.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Swedish National Diabetes Register, Sweden 2005-12.

Participants: 18,168 people with type 1 diabetes, 2441 using insulin pump therapy and 15,727 using multiple daily insulin injections.

Main outcome measures: Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios for the outcomes, with stratification of propensity scores including clinical characteristics, risk factors for cardiovascular disease, treatments, and previous diseases.

Results: Follow-up was for a mean of 6.8 years until December 2012, with 114,135 person years. With multiple daily injections as reference, the adjusted hazard ratios for insulin pump treatment were significantly lower: 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.83) for fatal coronary heart disease, 0.58 (0.40 to 0.85) for fatal cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease or stroke), and 0.73 (0.58 to 0.92) for all cause mortality. Hazard ratios were lower, but not significantly so, for fatal or non-fatal coronary heart disease and fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular disease. Unadjusted absolute differences were 3.0 events of fatal coronary heart disease per 1000 person years; corresponding figures were 3.3 for fatal cardiovascular disease and 5.7 for all cause mortality. When lower body mass index and previous cardiovascular diseases were excluded, results of subgroup analyses were similar to the results from complete data. A sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders in all individuals showed that an unmeasured confounders with hazard ratio of 1.3 would have to be present in >80% of the individuals treated with multiple daily injections versus not presence in those treated with pump therapy to invalidate the significantly lower hazard ratios for fatal cardiovascular disease. Data on patient education and frequency of blood glucose monitoring were missing, which might have influenced the observed association.

Conclusion: Among people with type 1 diabetes use of insulin pump therapy is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality than treatment with multiple daily insulin injections.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: KE-O has received fees from Sanofi and Novo Nordisk for lectures outside the submitted work; ML-O lectures about diabetology and has been paid by different pharmaceutical companies.

© Steineck et al 2015.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4794062/bin/stei024170.f1_default.jpg
Fig 1 Kaplan-Meier crude survival curves in 18 168 individuals with type 1 diabetes according to treatment with insulin pump therapy or multiple daily injections. No of cases and individuals at risk are given in each group
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4794062/bin/stei024170.f2_default.jpg
Fig 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves for first incident hypoglycaemic events in patients with type 1 diabetes during seven years of follow-up. No of cases and individuals at risk are given for each group

References

    1. Lind M, Svensson AM, Kosiborod M, et al. Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1972-82.
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2643-53.
    1. Eeg-Olofsson K, Cederholm J, Nilsson PM, et al. Glycemic control and cardiovascular disease in 7454 patients with type 1 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Care 2010;33:1640-6.
    1. Lung TW, Petrie D, Herman WH, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and mortality after cardiovascular events for Type 1 diabetic patients in Sweden. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2974-81.
    1. Plotnick LP, Clark LM, Brancati FL, et al. Safety and effectiveness of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1142-6.
    1. Bruttomesso D, Pianta A, Crazzolara D, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in the Veneto region: efficacy, acceptability and quality of life. Diabet Med 2002;19:628-34.
    1. Misso ML, Egberts KJ, Page M, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD005103.
    1. Fatourechi MM, Kudva YC, Murad MH, et al. Hypoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy: a systematic review and meta analyses of randomized trials of CSII versus MDI. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:729-40.
    1. Jeitler K, Horvath K, Berghold A, et al Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2008;51:941-51.
    1. Monami M, Lamanna C, Marchionni N, et al. CSII versus MDI in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol 2010;47:77-81.
    1. Fredheim S, Johansen A, Thorsen SU, et al. Nationwide reduction in the frequency of severe hypoglycemia by half. Acta Diabetol 2014;52:591-9.
    1. Annual Report 2013. Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR), Sweden, 2013. .
    1. Gudbjörnsdottir S, Cederholm J, Nilsson PM, et al, for the Steering Committee of the National Diabetes Register. The National Diabetes Register in Sweden. An implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration for Quality Improvement in Diabetes Care. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1270-6.
    1. Cederholm J, Eeg-Olofsson K, Eliasson B, et al; Swedish National Diabetes Register. A new model for 5-year risk of cardiovascular disease in type 1 diabetes; from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabet Med 2011;28:1213-20.
    1. Eliasson B, Gudbjörnsdottir S. Diabetes care—improvement through measurement. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;106(suppl 2):S291-4.
    1. Geistanger A, Arends S, Berding C, et al. Statistical methods for monitoring the relationship between the IFCC reference measurement procedure for hemoglobin A1c and the designated comparison methods in the United States, Japan, and Sweden. Clin Chem 2008;54:1379-85.
    1. Merlo J, Lindblad U, Pessah-Rasmussen H, et al. Comparison of different procedures to identify probable cases of myocardial infarction and stroke in two Swedish prospective cohort studies using local and national routine registers. Eur J Epidemiol 2000;16:235-43.
    1. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, et al. Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents. Circulation 1994;90:583-612.
    1. Berglund P, Heeringa S, eds. Multiple imputation of missing data using SAS. SAS Institute, July 2014.
    1. D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998;17:2265-81.
    1. Faries DE, Leon AC, Haro JM, eds. Analysis of observational health care data using SAS. SAS Institute, February 2010.
    1. Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med 2007;26:734-53.
    1. Estimating Cox regression models with Proc Phreg. In: Allison PD, ed. Survival analysis using SAS. A practical guide. Chapter 5. 2nd ed. SAS Institute, April 2010.
    1. Lin DY, Psaty BM, Kronmal RA. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics 1998;54:948-63.
    1. Abdollah F, Schmitges J, Sun M, et al. Comparison of mortality outcomes after radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer: a population-based analysis. Int J Urol 2012;19:836-44.
    1. Eklind-Cervenka M, Benson L, Dahlström U, et al. Association of candesartan vs losartan with all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. JAMA 2011;305:175-82.
    1. Sooriakumaran P, Nyberg T, Akre O, et al. Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: observational study of mortality outcomes. BMJ 2014;348:g1502.
    1. Ekström N, Cederholm J, Zethelius B, et al. Aspirin treatment and risk of first incident cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002688.
    1. Pickup JC, Sutton AJ. Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in type 1diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabet Med 2008;25:765-74.
    1. Arbab-Zadeh A, Nakano M, Virmani R, et al. Acute coronary events. Circulation 2012;125:1147-56.
    1. Bode BW, Steed RD, Davidson PC. Reduction in severe hypoglycemia with long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1996;19:324-7.
    1. Yeh HC, Brown TT, Maruthur N, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:336-47.
    1. Chow E, Bernjak A, Williams S, et al. Risk of cardiac arrhythmias during hypoglycemia in patients with type diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Diabetes 2014;63:1738-47.
    1. Ray KK, Seshasai SR, Wijesuriya S, et al. Effects of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus. Lancet 2009;373:1765-72.
    1. Stahn A, Pistrosch F, Ganz X, et al. Relationship between hypoglycemic episodes and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: silent hypoglycemias and silent arrhythmias. Diabetes Care 2014;37:516-20.
    1. Health Quality Ontario. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pumps for type 1 and type 2 adult diabetic populations: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2009;9:1-58.
    1. Pickup JC. Insulin-pump therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1616-24.
    1. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009;360:129-39.
    1. Mellbin LG, Rydén L, Riddle MC, et al. Does hypoglycaemia increase the risk of cardiovascular events? A report from the ORIGIN trial. Eur Heart J 2013;34:3137-44.
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 1997;46:271-86.
    1. Gruden G, Barutta F, Chaturvedi N, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and cardiovascular disease incidence in type 1 diabetes: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1598-604.
    1. Gimenez M, Lopez JJ, Castell C, et al. Hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular disease in type 1 diabetes. Results from the Catalan National Public Health registry on insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;96:23-5.
    1. Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, et al. Effectiveness of sensor augmented insulin pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2010;363:311-20.
    1. Snow R, Humphrey C, Sandall J. What happens when patients know more than their doctors? Experiences of health interactions after diabetes patient education: a qualitative patient-led study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003583.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren