Ubrogepant Is Safe and Efficacious in Participants Taking Concomitant Preventive Medication for Migraine: A Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Trials

Andrew M Blumenfeld, Kerry Knievel, Aubrey Manack Adams, Lawrence Severt, Matthew Butler, Hongxin Lai, David W Dodick, Andrew M Blumenfeld, Kerry Knievel, Aubrey Manack Adams, Lawrence Severt, Matthew Butler, Hongxin Lai, David W Dodick

Abstract

Introduction: Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist indicated for acute treatment of migraine that can be used to treat breakthrough attacks in individuals taking preventive treatment for migraine. We evaluated the impact of preventive medication use on the efficacy and safety of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine.

Methods: This was an analysis of pooled efficacy data from the ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II phase 3 trials, in which efficacy of ubrogepant was assessed at 2 h after taking study medication for pain freedom, absence of most bothersome symptom (MBS), and pain relief. In addition, a long-term safety (LTS) extension trial was completed where safety was assessed on the basis of incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Outcomes were compared between participants with or without prior (within 6 months) preventive medication use (anticonvulsants, beta blockers, antidepressants, or onabotulinumtoxinA). For efficacy analyses, data were pooled across ACHIEVE trials for the 50 mg and placebo groups; for safety analyses, data for all dose groups (50 mg and 100 mg) in the LTS trial were pooled.

Results: Preventive treatments were used by 417 of 2247 (18.6%) participants analyzed in the ACHIEVE trials and by 143 of 813 (17.5%) participants in the LTS trial. Responder rates for all outcomes were similar between participants with or without preventive treatment within each dose group (p > 0.05). No significant differences were noted across the different preventive medications. Rates and types of TEAEs were similar between participants with or without preventive treatment. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Efficacy and safety of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine were similar between participants with or without prior or current use of concomitant preventive medication.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02828020 (ACHIEVE I), NCT02867709 (ACHIEVE II), and NCT02873221 (long-term safety trial).

Keywords: Acute treatment; Concomitant therapies; Migraine; Preventive treatment; Ubrogepant.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial schemas. F/U, follow-up; mITT, modified intent-to-treat [–21]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pain freedom response rates at 2 h after ubrogepant administration between participants with and without preventive treatment. The percentage of participants achieving pain freedom at 2 h after ubrogepant administration is shown for participants receiving placebo in both ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II (POOLED data; dark gray bars) or in ACHIEVE I only (light gray bars), for participants receiving ubrogepant 50 mg in both ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II (POOLED data; dark green bars), or ubrogepant 100 mg in ACHIEVE I only (light green bars) for participants who were taking preventive medication (left bars) or not (right bars). p values are based on Fisher exact test, two-tailed, vs placebo
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Absence of MBS response rates at 2 h after ubrogepant administration between participants with and without preventive treatment. The percentage of participants achieving absence of MBS at 2 h after ubrogepant administration is shown for participants receiving placebo in both ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II (POOLED data; dark gray bars) or in ACHIEVE I only (light gray bars), for participants receiving ubrogepant 50 mg in both ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II (POOLED data; dark green bars), or ubrogepant 100 mg in ACHIEVE I only (light green bars) for participants who were taking preventive medication (left bars) or not (right bars). p values are based on Fisher exact test, two-tailed, vs placebo. MBS, most bothersome symptom
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pain relief response rates at 2 h after ubrogepant administration between participants with and without preventive treatment. The percentage of participants achieving pain freedom at 2 h after ubrogepant administration is shown for participants receiving placebo in both ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II (POOLED data; dark gray bars) or in ACHIEVE I only (light gray bars), for participants receiving ubrogepant 50 mg in both ACHIEVE I and ACHIEVE II (POOLED data; dark green bars), or ubrogepant 100 mg in ACHIEVE I only (light green bars) for participants who were taking preventive medication (left bars) or not (right bars). p values are based on Fisher exact test, two-tailed, vs placebo

References

    1. Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA. Pathophysiology of migraine. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:365–391. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183717.
    1. World Health Organization. Headache disorders. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2016. . Accessed 9 Sept 2020.
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–349. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211.
    1. Silberstein SD. Migraine symptoms: results of a survey of self-reported migraineurs. Headache. 1995;35(7):387–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3507387.x.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Holland PR. An update: pathophysiology of migraine. Neurol Clin. 2019;37(4):651–671. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2019.07.008.
    1. American Headache Society The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2019;59(1):1–18.
    1. Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015;21(4 Headache):973–89.
    1. Curto M, Capi M, Cipolla F, Cisale GY, Martelletti P, Lionetto L. Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(7):755–759. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1721462.
    1. Loder E, Rizzoli P. Pharmacologic prevention of migraine: a narrative review of the state of the art in 2018. Headache. 2018;58(Suppl 3):218–229. doi: 10.1111/head.13375.
    1. Ubrelvy [package insert]. Madison, NJ: Allergan USA, Inc. 2020.
    1. Moore E, Fraley ME, Bell IM, et al. Characterization of ubrogepant: a potent and selective antagonist of the human calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2020;373(1):160–166.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Edvinsson L, Jakate A, Banerjee P. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of ubrogepant: a potent, selective calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for the acute treatment of migraine. J Fam Pract. 2020;69(1 suppl):S8–S12.
    1. Do TP, Guo S, Ashina M. Therapeutic novelties in migraine: new drugs, new hope? J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0974-3.
    1. Piccinni C, Cevoli S, Ronconi G, et al. A real-world study on unmet medical needs in triptan-treated migraine: prevalence, preventive therapies and triptan use modification from a large Italian population along two years. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1027-7.
    1. Lipton RB, Buse DC, Serrano D, Holland S, Reed ML. Examination of unmet treatment needs among persons with episodic migraine: results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache. 2013;53(8):1300–1311. doi: 10.1111/head.12154.
    1. Lipton RB, Hutchinson S, Ailani J, et al. Discontinuation of acute prescription medication for migraine: results from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache. 2019;59(10):1762–1772. doi: 10.1111/head.13642.
    1. Messali AJ, Yang M, Gillard P, et al. Treatment persistence and switching in triptan users: a systematic literature review. Headache. 2014;54(7):1120–1130. doi: 10.1111/head.12404.
    1. Dodick DW, Lipton RB, Ailani J, et al. Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(23):2230–2241. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813049.
    1. Lipton RB, Dodick DW, Ailani J, et al. Effect of ubrogepant versus placebo on pain and the most bothersome associated symptom in the acute treatment of migraine: the ACHIEVE II randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1887–1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16711.
    1. Ailani J, Lipton RB, Hutchinson S, et al. Long-term safety evaluation of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: phase 3, randomized, 52-week extension trial. Headache. 2020;60(1):141–152. doi: 10.1111/head.13682.
    1. Loo LS, Ailani J, Schim J, et al. Efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in patients using concomitant migraine preventive medications: findings from SAMURAI and SPARTAN, two randomized phase 3 trials. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1032-x.
    1. Lionetto L, Borro M, Curto M, et al. Choosing the safest acute therapy during chronic migraine prophylactic treatment: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(4):399–406. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2016.1154042.
    1. Ansari H, Ziad S. Drug-drug interactions in headache medicine. Headache. 2016;56(7):1241–1248. doi: 10.1111/head.12864.
    1. Pomes LM, Guglielmetti M, Bertamino E, Simmaco M, Borro M, Martelletti P. Optimising migraine treatment: from drug-drug interactions to personalized medicine. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1010-3.
    1. Singh A, Gupta D, Sahoo AK. Acute migraine: can the new drugs clinically outpace? SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(8):1132–1138. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00390-1.
    1. Topamax [package insert]. Titusville, NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2019.
    1. Jakate A, Blumenfeld AM, Boinpally R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of ubrogepant when coadministered with calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted monoclonal antibody migraine preventives in participants with migraine: a randomized phase 1b drug-drug interaction study. Headache. 2021;61(4):642–652. doi: 10.1111/head.14095.
    1. Li C, Palcza J, Xu J, et al. The effect of multiple doses of ubrogepant on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive in healthy women: results of an open-label, single-center, two-period, fixed-sequence study. Cephalalgia Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1177/2515816320905082.
    1. Jakate A, Boinpally R, Butler M, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction and safety of ubrogepant coadministered with acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a randomized trial. Cephalalgia Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1177/2515816320921186.
    1. Navratilova E, Behravesh S, Oyarzo J, Dodick DW, Banerjee P, Porreca F. Ubrogepant does not induce latent sensitization in a preclinical model of medication overuse headache. Cephalalgia. 2020;40:892–902. doi: 10.1177/0333102420938652.
    1. Aimovig [package insert]. Thousand Oaks, CA, and East Hanover, NJ: Amgen Inc., and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren