Characteristics of Women Enrolled in a Patient Portal Intervention for Menopause

Avi H Lamba, Kiranmayee Muralidhar, Anika Jain, Fei Tang, Orlando Gomez-Marin, Silvina Levis, Stuti Dang, Avi H Lamba, Kiranmayee Muralidhar, Anika Jain, Fei Tang, Orlando Gomez-Marin, Silvina Levis, Stuti Dang

Abstract

Background: We developed a 6-month educational intervention addressing menopause and management of menopausal symptoms called "My HealtheVet to Enable And Negotiate for Shared decision-making" or MEANS. MEANS is offered through secure messaging via the My HealtheVet patient portal system. Materials and Methods: Women veterans aged 45-60 years registered at the Miami, West Palm Beach, and Orlando Veterans Affairs Healthcare Systems (VAHS). Intervention group: women in the Miami VAHS enrolled in My HealtheVet who were sent an invitation, agreed to participate, and completed the baseline survey. Comparison group: women from the Miami, West Palm Beach, and Orlando VAHS who responded to the baseline survey. Results: The intervention group enrolled 269 women at Miami VAHS: average age 53.2 years; 42.4% white, 43.1% black, and 24.2% Hispanic; 95.9% already used My Healthe Vet. The Comparison group had 590 women: average age 53.8 years; 70.8% white, 20.7% black, and 10.2% Hispanic; 57.6% already used My Healthe Vet. Conclusions: The differences between the intervention and comparison groups likely represent the regional demographic variations and the disparate recruitment techniques adopted for the two groups. Using within- and between-group comparisons at the end of the 6-month intervention, this novel project will evaluate the feasibility of a patient portal intervention on knowledge and shared decision-making regarding menopause among racially and ethnically diverse women. The study highlights the scalable and enormous potential for patient portals in nonurgent chronic disease management and shared decision-making, important in the existing health care climate, wherein "meaningful use" of electronic health records is mandated. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, medical care has abruptly changed to telehealth and this approach to patient education is more relevant now than ever before. This quality improvement project's registration number is ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03109145.

Keywords: menopausal symptoms; menopause; patient portal; shared decision-making.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

© Avi Lamba et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Menopause intervention delivered via My HealtheVet.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Enrollment in the MEANS project by site. MEANS, My HealtheVet to Enable And Negotiate for Shared decision-making.

References

    1. Trudeau KJ, Ainscough JL, Trant M, Starker J, Cousineau TM. Identifying the educational needs of menopausal women: A feasibility study. Womens Health Issues 2011;21:145–152
    1. Sood R, Kuhle CL, Kapoor E, et al. . Association of mindfulness and stress with menopausal symptoms in midlife women. Climacteric 2019;22:377–382
    1. Katon JG, Gray KE, Gerber MR, et al. . Vasomotor symptoms and quality of life among veteran and non-veteran postmenopausal women. Gerontologist 2016;56 Suppl 1:S40–S53
    1. Avis NE, Crawford SL, Greendale G, et al. . Duration of menopausal vasomotor symptoms over the menopause transition. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:531–539
    1. Dietz NA, Mijares-Cantrell T, Acevedo D, et al. . Women veterans and menopause: Knowledge and preferences. Women Health 2018;58:898–914
    1. Resurreccion DM, Motrico E, Rigabert A, et al. . Barriers for nonparticipation and dropout of women in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A systematic review. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017;26:849–859
    1. What is a patient portal? The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) Web site. Available at: Published 2017. Updated September 29, 2017. Accessed January1, 2018
    1. Vydra TP, Cuaresma E, Kretovics M, Bose-Brill S. Diffusion and use of tethered personal health records in primary care. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2015;12:1c
    1. Dang S, Siddharthan K, Ruiz DI, Gomez-Orozco CA, Rodriguez R, Gomez-Marin O. Evaluating an electronic health record intervention for management of heart failure among Veterans. Telemed J E Health 2018;24:1006–1013..
    1. Kuo A, Dang S. Secure messaging in electronic health records and its impact on diabetes clinical outcomes: A systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2016;22:769–777
    1. Davis S, Roudsari A, Raworth R, Courtney KL, MacKay L. Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: A scoping review at the crossroads. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017;24:857–866
    1. Liebovitz D. Meaningful EHR attributes for an era of accountability, transparency, shared decision making, and value assessment. J Leg Med 2013;34:43–53
    1. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. . Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361–1367
    1. Dang S, Thavalathil B, Ruiz D, Gomez-Orozco C, Gomez-Marin O, Levis S. A patient portal intervention for menopause knowledge and shared decision-making. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019;28:1614–1622
    1. Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, et al. . A three-talk model for shared decision making: Multistage consultation process. BMJ 2017;359:j4891.
    1. Haun JN, Lind JD, Shimada SL, et al. . Evaluating user experiences of the secure messaging tool on the Veterans Affairs' patient portal system. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e75.
    1. Haun JN, Patel NR, Lind JD, Antinori N. Large-scale survey findings inform patients' experiences in using secure messaging to engage in patient-provider communication and self-care management: A quantitative assessment. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e282.
    1. Pew Research Center. Mobile Fact Sheet. Available at: Published 2019. Accessed May30, 2020
    1. Bush NE, Wheeler WM. Personal technology use by US military service members and veterans: An update. Telemed EHealth 2015;21:245–258
    1. Irizarry T, DeVito Dabbs A, Curran CR. Patient portals and patient engagement: A state of the science review. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e148.
    1. Woods SS, Forsberg CW, Schwartz EC, et al. . The association of patient factors, digital access, and online behavior on sustained patient portal use: A prospective cohort of enrolled users. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e345.
    1. Beiter PA, Sorscher J, Henderson CJ, Talen M. Do electronic medical record (EMR) demonstrations change attitudes, knowledge, skills or needs? Inform Prim Care 2008;16:221–227
    1. Ancker JS, Mauer E, Hauser D, Calman N. Expanding access to high-quality plain-language patient education information through context-specific hyperlinks. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2016;2016:277–284
    1. Liao K, Hunter M. Preparation for menopause: Prospective evaluation of a health education intervention for mid-aged women. Maturitas 1998;29:215–224
    1. Kuo AM, Thavalathil B, Elwyn G, Nemeth Z, Dang S. The promise of electronic health records to promote shared decision making: A narrative review and a look ahead. Med Decis Making 2018;38:1040–1045

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren