Bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: long-term inflammatory response and functionality

Huitzilihuitl Saucedo-Orozco, Jesus Vargas-Barron, Ricardo Márquez-Velazco, Julio Iván Farjat-Pasos, Karla Susana Martinez-Zavala, Valentin Jiménez-Rojas, Sergio Andres Criales-Vera, Jose Antonio Arias-Godínez, Giovanni Fuentevilla-Alvarez, Veronica Guarner-Lans, Israel Perez-Torres, Gabriela Melendez-Ramirez, Tomas Efrain Sanchez Perez, Maria Elena Soto, Huitzilihuitl Saucedo-Orozco, Jesus Vargas-Barron, Ricardo Márquez-Velazco, Julio Iván Farjat-Pasos, Karla Susana Martinez-Zavala, Valentin Jiménez-Rojas, Sergio Andres Criales-Vera, Jose Antonio Arias-Godínez, Giovanni Fuentevilla-Alvarez, Veronica Guarner-Lans, Israel Perez-Torres, Gabriela Melendez-Ramirez, Tomas Efrain Sanchez Perez, Maria Elena Soto

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of long-term inflammatory response and function in postoperative patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR) deserves special analysis because it is important to try to prevent reoperation and improve durability and functionality of the prostheses. It is our objective METHODS: In this study, we included a cohort of patients with aortic valve damage treated by AVR with mechanical prosthesis, bio prosthesis and we included a control group.

Results: We found that IL-4 and osteopontin levels were higher in patients with mechanical vs biological prostheses (p=0.01 and p=0.04, respectively), osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels were decreased (p=0.01), women had lower levels of ET-1 and IL-6, (p=0.02) (p=0.04), respectively. Patients older than 60 years had decreased levels of IL-1ß p<0.001) and a higher concentration of IL-4 p<0.05). IL-1ß, OPG and TNFα were higher in patients with less than 5 years of evolution vs more than 10 years (p=0.004, p=0.02 and p=0.03, respectively). Factors such as age, gender, prosthetic and elevated IL-1B and ET-1 levels are associated with valve dysfunction prosthetic. These results indicate that the inflammatory involvement present prior to valve replacement may be perpetuated by various factors in the long term.

Conclusions: The findings provide us with the opportunity to effectively treat patients with AVR in the postoperative period, which could prolong the functionality of the bio prostheses.

Trial registration number: NCT04557345.

Keywords: Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Echocardiography; Heart Valve Prosthesis.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bioprosthesis INC, manufactured at the ‘Ignacio Chávez’ National Cardiology Institute.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates did not show significant differences between patients with mechanical aortic valve and bioprosthetic valve.

References

    1. Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkilä J, et al. . Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:1220–5. 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90249-Z
    1. Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach DD, et al. . Characterization of the early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation 1994;90:844–53. 10.1161/01.CIR.90.2.844
    1. Kaden JJ, Dempfle C-E, Grobholz R, et al. . Interleukin-1 beta promotes matrix metalloproteinase expression and cell proliferation in calcific aortic valve stenosis. Atherosclerosis 2003;170:205–11. 10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00284-3
    1. Yetkin E, Waltenberger J. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 2009;135:4–13. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.03.108
    1. Grim JC, Aguado BA, Vogt BJ, et al. . Secreted factors from proinflammatory macrophages promote an osteoblast-like phenotype in valvular interstitial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020;40:e296–308. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315261
    1. Yu P-J, Skolnick A, Ferrari G, et al. . Correlation between plasma osteopontin levels and aortic valve calcification: potential insights into the pathogenesis of aortic valve calcification and stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:196–9. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.10.045
    1. Cao H, Li Q, Li M, et al. . Osteoprotegerin/RANK/RANKL axis and atrial remodeling in mitral valvular patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:702–8. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.099
    1. Soto ME, Salas JL, Vargas-Barron J, et al. . Pre- and post-surgical evaluation of the inflammatory response in patients with aortic stenosis treated with different types of prosthesis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017;17:100. 10.1186/s12872-017-0526-1
    1. Schanen BC, Karakoti AS, Seal S, et al. . Exposure to titanium dioxide nanomaterials provokes inflammation of an in vitro human immune construct. ACS Nano 2009;3:2523–32. 10.1021/nn900403h
    1. Du DT, McKean S, Kelman JA, et al. . Early mortality after aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic valves among Medicare beneficiaries: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1788–95. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4300
    1. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. . Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:254–75. 10.1093/ehjci/jew335
    1. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. . 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739–91. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391
    1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. . Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:e14:1–39. 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
    1. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. . Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Cchocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:975–1014. 10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.013
    1. Crowther JR, ELISA Crowther JR:. Elisa. theory and practice. Methods Mol Biol 1995;42:1–218. 10.1385/0-89603-279-5:1
    1. Juárez Hernández A SnPrT . Nueva generación de bioprótesis del Instituto Nacional de Cardiología “Ignacio Chávez”. Arch Cardiol Mex 2003;73:S73–8.
    1. Gilmanov A, Stolarski H, Sotiropoulos F. Flow-Structure interaction simulations of the aortic heart valve at physiologic conditions: the role of tissue constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 2018;140. 10.1115/1.4038885. [Epub ahead of print: 01 04 2018].
    1. Adamczyk T, Mizia-Stec K, Mizia M, et al. . Biomarkers of calcification and atherosclerosis in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis in relation to concomitant coronary artery disease. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2012;122:14–21. 10.20452/pamw.1128
    1. Kassem KM, Ali M, Rhaleb N-E. Interleukin 4: its role in hypertension, atherosclerosis, valvular, and nonvalvular cardiovascular diseases. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2020;25:7–14. 10.1177/1074248419868699
    1. Rodriguez-Hernandez A, Elena Soto M, Vargas-Barron J, et al. . Immunologic responses in biological and mechanical valve prostheses: inflammation and functionality are not always related. J Heart Valve Dis 2017;26:334–43.
    1. Lu F, Wu H, Bai Y, et al. . Evidence of osteogenic regulation in calcific porcine aortic valves. Heart Surg Forum 2018;21:E375–81. 10.1532/hsf.2033
    1. Makarović S, Makarović Z, Bilić-Ćurčić I, et al. . Serum osteoprotegerin in patients with calcified aortic valve stenosis in relation to heart failure. Acta Clin Croat 2017;56:733–41. 10.20471/acc.2017.56.04.22
    1. Lis GJ, Czubek U, Jasek-Gajda E, et al. . Influence of osteoclasts and osteoprotegerin on the mode of calcific degeneration of aortic valves. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2016;126:149–58. 10.20452/pamw.3326
    1. Peltonen T, Taskinen P, Näpänkangas J, et al. . Increase in tissue endothelin-1 and ETA receptor levels in human aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 2009;30:242–9. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn482
    1. Chester A. Chester AH: endothelin-1 and the aortic valve. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2005;3:353–7. 10.2174/157016105774329435
    1. Majak P, Bjørnstad JL, Braathen B, et al. . Endothelin-1 in the human myocardium and circulating plasma: evaluation before, during and after correction of aortic stenosis with aortic valve replacement. Cardiology 2012;123:1–10. 10.1159/000339756
    1. Raffa GM, Jackson V, Liska J, et al. . Endothelin-1 and brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels decrease after aortic surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 2010;19:724–30.
    1. Nadlonek N, Lee JH, Reece TB, et al. . Interleukin-1 beta induces an inflammatory phenotype in human aortic valve interstitial cells through nuclear factor kappa beta. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:155–62. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.013
    1. Walker GA, Masters KS, Shah DN, et al. . Valvular myofibroblast activation by transforming growth factor-beta: implications for pathological extracellular matrix remodeling in heart valve disease. Circ Res 2004;95:253–60. 10.1161/01.RES.0000136520.07995.aa
    1. Rattazzi M, Donato M, Bertacco E, et al. . L-Arginine prevents inflammatory and pro-calcific differentiation of interstitial aortic valve cells. Atherosclerosis 2020;298:27–35. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.02.024

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren