Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in Patients Positive for COVID-19

Ho Yuen Frank Wong, Hiu Yin Sonia Lam, Ambrose Ho-Tung Fong, Siu Ting Leung, Thomas Wing-Yan Chin, Christine Shing Yen Lo, Macy Mei-Sze Lui, Jonan Chun Yin Lee, Keith Wan-Hang Chiu, Tom Wai-Hin Chung, Elaine Yuen Phin Lee, Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung, Tina Poy Wing Lam, Michael D Kuo, Ming-Yen Ng, Ho Yuen Frank Wong, Hiu Yin Sonia Lam, Ambrose Ho-Tung Fong, Siu Ting Leung, Thomas Wing-Yan Chin, Christine Shing Yen Lo, Macy Mei-Sze Lui, Jonan Chun Yin Lee, Keith Wan-Hang Chiu, Tom Wai-Hin Chung, Elaine Yuen Phin Lee, Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung, Tina Poy Wing Lam, Michael D Kuo, Ming-Yen Ng

Abstract

Background Current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) radiologic literature is dominated by CT, and a detailed description of chest radiography appearances in relation to the disease time course is lacking. Purpose To describe the time course and severity of findings of COVID-19 at chest radiography and correlate these with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, or SARS-CoV-2, nucleic acid. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 confirmed by using RT-PCR and chest radiographic examinations who were admitted across four hospitals and evaluated between January and March 2020. Baseline and serial chest radiographs (n = 255) were reviewed with RT-PCR. Correlation with concurrent CT examinations (n = 28) was performed when available. Two radiologists scored each chest radiograph in consensus for consolidation, ground-glass opacity, location, and pleural fluid. A severity index was determined for each lung. The lung scores were summed to produce the final severity score. Results The study was composed of 64 patients (26 men; mean age, 56 years ± 19 [standard deviation]). Of these, 58 patients had initial positive findings with RT-PCR (91%; 95% confidence interval: 81%, 96%), 44 patients had abnormal findings at baseline chest radiography (69%; 95% confidence interval: 56%, 80%), and 38 patients had initial positive findings with RT-PCR testing and abnormal findings at baseline chest radiography (59%; 95% confidence interval: 46%, 71%). Six patients (9%) showed abnormalities at chest radiography before eventually testing positive for COVID-19 with RT-PCR. Sensitivity of initial RT-PCR (91%; 95% confidence interval: 83%, 97%) was higher than that of baseline chest radiography (69%; 95% confidence interval: 56%, 80%) (P = .009). Radiographic recovery (mean, 6 days ± 5) and virologic recovery (mean, 8 days ± 6) were not significantly different (P = .33). Consolidation was the most common finding (30 of 64; 47%) followed by ground-glass opacities (21 of 64; 33%). Abnormalities at chest radiography had a peripheral distribution (26 of 64; 41%) and lower zone distribution (32 of 64; 50%) with bilateral involvement (32 of 64; 50%). Pleural effusion was uncommon (two of 64; 3%). The severity of findings at chest radiography peaked at 10-12 days from the date of symptom onset. Conclusion Findings at chest radiography in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 frequently showed bilateral lower zone consolidation, which peaked at 10-12 days from symptom onset. © RSNA, 2020.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Study flow chart
Figure 2a:
Figure 2a:
Chest x-ray scoring system. A score of 0-4 was assigned to each lung depending on the extent of involvement by consolidation or GGO (0 = no involvement; 1 = <25%; 2 = 25-50%; 3 = 50-75%; 4 = >75% involvement). The scores for each lung were summed to produce the final severity score. Examples of chest x-ray severity scoring in patients with COVD-19 (Days from symptom onset; R lung score + L lung score = total score): (A) Day 12; 1 + 0 = 1. (B) Day 5; 2 + 1 = 3. (C) Day 3; 1 + 3 = 4. (D) Day 10; 4 + 3 = 7.
Figure 2b:
Figure 2b:
Chest x-ray scoring system. A score of 0-4 was assigned to each lung depending on the extent of involvement by consolidation or GGO (0 = no involvement; 1 = <25%; 2 = 25-50%; 3 = 50-75%; 4 = >75% involvement). The scores for each lung were summed to produce the final severity score. Examples of chest x-ray severity scoring in patients with COVD-19 (Days from symptom onset; R lung score + L lung score = total score): (A) Day 12; 1 + 0 = 1. (B) Day 5; 2 + 1 = 3. (C) Day 3; 1 + 3 = 4. (D) Day 10; 4 + 3 = 7.
Figure 2c:
Figure 2c:
Chest x-ray scoring system. A score of 0-4 was assigned to each lung depending on the extent of involvement by consolidation or GGO (0 = no involvement; 1 = <25%; 2 = 25-50%; 3 = 50-75%; 4 = >75% involvement). The scores for each lung were summed to produce the final severity score. Examples of chest x-ray severity scoring in patients with COVD-19 (Days from symptom onset; R lung score + L lung score = total score): (A) Day 12; 1 + 0 = 1. (B) Day 5; 2 + 1 = 3. (C) Day 3; 1 + 3 = 4. (D) Day 10; 4 + 3 = 7.
Figure 2d:
Figure 2d:
Chest x-ray scoring system. A score of 0-4 was assigned to each lung depending on the extent of involvement by consolidation or GGO (0 = no involvement; 1 = <25%; 2 = 25-50%; 3 = 50-75%; 4 = >75% involvement). The scores for each lung were summed to produce the final severity score. Examples of chest x-ray severity scoring in patients with COVD-19 (Days from symptom onset; R lung score + L lung score = total score): (A) Day 12; 1 + 0 = 1. (B) Day 5; 2 + 1 = 3. (C) Day 3; 1 + 3 = 4. (D) Day 10; 4 + 3 = 7.
Figure 3a:
Figure 3a:
Chest x-ray findings in COVID-19: (A) patchy consolidations, (B) pleural effusion, (C) perihilar distribution, and (D) peripheral distribution.
Figure 3b:
Figure 3b:
Chest x-ray findings in COVID-19: (A) patchy consolidations, (B) pleural effusion, (C) perihilar distribution, and (D) peripheral distribution.
Figure 3c:
Figure 3c:
Chest x-ray findings in COVID-19: (A) patchy consolidations, (B) pleural effusion, (C) perihilar distribution, and (D) peripheral distribution.
Figure 3d:
Figure 3d:
Chest x-ray findings in COVID-19: (A) patchy consolidations, (B) pleural effusion, (C) perihilar distribution, and (D) peripheral distribution.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Change in COVID-19 chest x-ray (CXR) severity score with duration since symptom onset. A score of 0-4 was assigned to each lung depending on the extent of involvement by consolidation or GGO (0 = no involvement; 1 = 75% involvement). The scores for each lung were summed to produce the final severity score. Kruskal-Wallis test (p=0.01) indicated a significant difference between the scores at different time points.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Baseline chest x-ray (CXR) severity scores between COVID-19 patients with initially positive (n=58) and negative RT-PCR (n=6) for SARS-2COV nucleic acid. There was no statistical difference (p = 0.62).
Figure 6a:
Figure 6a:
Ground glass opacities seen on computed tomography in a patient with COVID-19 (Image A) but not visible on CXR (Image B). Abbreviations RT-PCR – reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, GGO- ground glass opacity
Figure 6b:
Figure 6b:
Ground glass opacities seen on computed tomography in a patient with COVID-19 (Image A) but not visible on CXR (Image B).

References

    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. . A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. January 2020. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017.
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. . Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
    1. World Health Organization . Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 51.; 2020.
    1. World Health Organization . Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 62.; 2020.
    1. Zhou S, Wang Y, Zhu T, Xia L. CT Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia in 62 Patients in Wuhan, China. Am J Roentgenol. March 2020:1–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.20.22975.
    1. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. . Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology. February 2020:200642. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200642.
    1. Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, et al. . Chest CT Findings in Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to Duration of Infection. Radiology. February 2020:200463. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200463.
    1. Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, et al. . Time Course of Lung Changes On Chest CT During Recovery From 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia. Radiology. February 2020:200370. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200370.
    1. Ng M-Y, Lee EY, Yang J, et al. . Imaging Profile of the COVID-19 Infection: Radiologic Findings and Literature Review. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2(1):e200034. doi:10.1148/ryct.2020200034.
    1. Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, et al. . CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology. February 2020:200230. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200230.
    1. Chinese Society of Radiology . Chinese Society of Radiology. Radiological diagnosis of new coronavirus infected pneumonitis: Expert recommendation from the Chinese Society of Radiology (First edition). Chin J Radiol. 2020;54(00):E001-E001. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2020.0001.
    1. Zu ZY, Di Jiang M, Xu PP, et al. . Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Perspective from China. Radiology. February 2020:200490. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200490.
    1. Zhang H-W, Yu J, Xu H-J, et al. . Corona Virus International Public Health Emergencies: Implications for Radiology Management. Acad Radiol. February 2020. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.02.003.
    1. Lessons from the frontline of the covid-19 outbreak - The BMJ. . Accessed March 22, 2020.
    1. ACR Recommendations for the use of Chest Radiography and Computed Tomography (CT) for Suspected COVID-19 Infection | American College of Radiology. . Accessed March 22, 2020.
    1. Imaging the coronavirus disease COVID-19. . Accessed March 23, 2020.
    1. Hong Kong SAR Government Centre for Health . Latest Situation of Cases of COVID-19.; 2020. .
    1. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: Glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246(3):697-722. doi:10.1148/radiol.2462070712.
    1. Warren MA, Zhao Z, Koyama T, et al. . Severity scoring of lung oedema on the chest radiograph is associated with clinical outcomes in ARDS. Thorax. 2018;73(9):840-846. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211280.
    1. Chan JF-W, Yip CC-Y, To KK-W, et al. . Improved molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by the novel, highly sensitive and specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay validated in vitro and with clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. March 2020:JCM.00310-20. doi:10.1128/JCM.00310-20.
    1. Yoon SH, Lee KH, Kim JY, et al. . Chest Radiographic and CT Findings of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Analysis of Nine Patients Treated in Korea. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(PG-10.3348/kjr.2020.0132):10.3348/kjr.2020.0132. doi:10.3348/kjr.2020.0132.
    1. Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review of Imaging Findings in 919 Patients. Am J Roentgenol. March 2020:1–7. doi:10.2214/AJR.20.23034.
    1. Wang Y, Dong C, Hu Y, et al. . Temporal Changes of CT Findings in 90 Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Longitudinal Study. Radiology. March 2020:200843. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200843.
    1. Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, et al. . Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RTPCR. Radiology. February 2020:200432. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200432.
    1. Wang X, Xu H, Jiang H, et al. . Follow-Up Study of 131 COVID-19 Discharged Patients: Is the Current Chinese Discharge Criteria Reliable? March 2020. . Accessed March 21, 2020.
    1. Xing Y, Mo P, Xiao Y, Zhao O, Zhang Y, Wang F. Post-discharge surveillance and positive virus detection in two medical staff recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), China, January to February 2020. Eurosurveillance. 2020;25(10):2000191. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000191.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren