Effects of intensity and amount of exercise on measures of insulin and glucose: Analysis of inter-individual variability

Louise de Lannoy, John Clarke, Paula J Stotz, Robert Ross, Louise de Lannoy, John Clarke, Paula J Stotz, Robert Ross

Abstract

Aim: To determine the separate effects of exercise amount and intensity on the rate of response for glucose and insulin variables, where rate of response was defined as the number of individuals with improvement in glucose and insulin values that was beyond the day-to-day variability of measurement.

Methods: Participants were 171 sedentary, middle-aged abdominally obese adults who completed a 24-week intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to (1) no-exercise control (n = 51), (2) low-amount, low-intensity exercise (LALI, n = 38), (3) high-amount, low-intensity exercise (HALI, n = 52), or (4) high-amount, high-intensity exercise (HAHI, n = 30). Two-hour glucose, insulin area under the curve (AUC), and fasting insulin were measured during a 2-hour, 75g oral glucose challenge. The day-to-day variability for these measures was calculated to be ±2.2 mmol/L, ±940.2 pmol/L, and ±38.9 pmol/L, respectively.

Results: At 24 weeks, the number of nonresponders for 2-hr glucose was 98.0%, 86.8%, 94.2%, 86.7% in the control, LALI, HALI, and HAHI groups, respectively. The number of nonresponders for insulin AUC was 88.0%, 75.7%, 75.0%, 80.0% in the control, LALI, HALI, and HAHI groups, respectively. The number of nonresponders for fasting insulin was 88.2%, 84.2%, 84.6%, 93.3% in the control, LALI, HALI, and HAHI groups, respectively. The rate of response was not different between control and any of the exercise groups for any measure (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The improvement in glucose and insulin measures did not exceed the day-to-day variability of measurement for approximately 80% of the participants independent of exercise amount or intensity.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Change in 2-hour glucose for…
Fig 1. Change in 2-hour glucose for each participant at 16 and 24 weeks across groups.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise. 2TEs = 2.2 mmol/L.
Fig 2. Change in insulin AUC for…
Fig 2. Change in insulin AUC for each participant at 24 weeks across groups.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise. 2TEs = 940.2 pmol/L.
Fig 3. Change in fasting insulin for…
Fig 3. Change in fasting insulin for each participant at 24 weeks across groups.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise. 2TEs = 38.9 pmol/L.
Fig 4. Change in body weight associated…
Fig 4. Change in body weight associated with 2-hour glucose and insulin AUC change for each participant across 24 weeks.
(A) Weight change (red bars; kg) with 2-hour glucose change (black bars; mmol/L) and (B) Weight change (red bars; kg) with insulin AUC change (black bars; pmol/L). Data for fasting insulin not shown. LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise. * indicates significant difference in weight change between responders and nonresponders at p

Fig 5. Change in sedentary time with…

Fig 5. Change in sedentary time with corresponding change in 2-hour glucose and insulin AUC…

Fig 5. Change in sedentary time with corresponding change in 2-hour glucose and insulin AUC for each participant at 24 weeks across groups.
(A) Change in sedentary time (red bars; min/d) with 2-hour glucose change (black bars; mmol/L) and (B) Change in sedentary time (red bars; min/d) with insulin AUC change (black bars; pmol/L). Data for fasting insulin not shown. LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise. * indicates 377 min/d of sedentary time, ** indicates -598 min/d of sedentary time.

Fig 6. Change in 2-hour glucose for…

Fig 6. Change in 2-hour glucose for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%,…

Fig 6. Change in 2-hour glucose for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%, and 90% adherence.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise.

Fig 7. Change in insulin AUC for…

Fig 7. Change in insulin AUC for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%,…

Fig 7. Change in insulin AUC for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%, and 90% adherence.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise.

Fig 8. Change in fasting insulin for…

Fig 8. Change in fasting insulin for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%,…

Fig 8. Change in fasting insulin for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%, and 90% adherence.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise.
All figures (8)
Fig 5. Change in sedentary time with…
Fig 5. Change in sedentary time with corresponding change in 2-hour glucose and insulin AUC for each participant at 24 weeks across groups.
(A) Change in sedentary time (red bars; min/d) with 2-hour glucose change (black bars; mmol/L) and (B) Change in sedentary time (red bars; min/d) with insulin AUC change (black bars; pmol/L). Data for fasting insulin not shown. LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise. * indicates 377 min/d of sedentary time, ** indicates -598 min/d of sedentary time.
Fig 6. Change in 2-hour glucose for…
Fig 6. Change in 2-hour glucose for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%, and 90% adherence.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise.
Fig 7. Change in insulin AUC for…
Fig 7. Change in insulin AUC for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%, and 90% adherence.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise.
Fig 8. Change in fasting insulin for…
Fig 8. Change in fasting insulin for each participant at 24 weeks at 70%, 80%, and 90% adherence.
LALI = low amount, low intensity exercise; HALI = high amount, low intensity exercise; HAHI = high amount, high intensity exercise.

References

    1. Rankinen T, Sarzynski MA, Ghosh S, Bouchard C. Are there genetic paths common to obesity, cardiovascular disease outcomes, and cardiovascular risk factors? Circ Res. 2015;116(5):909–22. doi:
    1. Bouchard C, Blair SN, Church TS, Earnest CP, Hagberg JM, Hakkinen K, et al. Adverse metabolic response to regular exercise: is it a rare or common occurrence? PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37887 doi:
    1. Boule NG, Weisnagel SJ, Lakka TA, Tremblay A, Bergman RN, Rankinen T, et al. Effects of exercise training on glucose homeostasis: the HERITAGE Family Study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(1):108–14.
    1. Hirsch S, Barrera G, Leiva L, de la Maza MP, Bunout D. Variability of glycemic and insulin response to a standard meal, within and between healthy subjects. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28(2):541–4. doi:
    1. Donga E, van Dijk M, van Dijk JG, Biermasz NR, Lammers GJ, van Kralingen KW, et al. A single night of partial sleep deprivation induces insulin resistance in multiple metabolic pathways in healthy subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(6):2963–8. doi:
    1. Dallman MF, Akana SF, Strack AM, Hanson ES, Sebastian RJ. The neural network that regulates energy balance is responsive to glucocorticoids and insulin and also regulates HPA axis responsivity at a site proximal to CRF neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;771:730–42.
    1. Vega-Lopez S, Ausman LM, Griffith JL, Lichtenstein AH. Interindividual variability and intra-individual reproducibility of glycemic index values for commercial white bread. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1412–7. doi:
    1. Ross R, de Lannoy L, Stotz PJ. Separate Effects of Intensity and Amount of Exercise on Interindividual Cardiorespiratory Fitness Response. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(11):1506–14. doi:
    1. Clarke J, de Lannoy L, Ross R. Comparison of Measures of Maximal and Submaximal Fitness in Response to Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016.
    1. Gurd BJ, Giles MD, Bonafiglia JT, Raleigh JP, Boyd JC, Ma JK, et al. Incidence of nonresponse and individual patterns of response following sprint interval training. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(3):229–34. doi:
    1. Ross R, Hudson R, Day AG, Lam M. Dose-response effects of exercise on abdominal obesity and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in adults: study rationale, design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;34(1):155–60. doi:
    1. Ross R, Hudson R, Stotz PJ, Lam M. Effects of exercise amount and intensity on abdominal obesity and glucose tolerance in obese adults: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(5):325–34. doi:
    1. Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJ, Smith H, Paddags A, Hudson R, et al. Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(2):92–103.
    1. Ross R, Janssen I, Dawson J, Kungl AM, Kuk JL, Wong SL, et al. Exercise-induced reduction in obesity and insulin resistance in women: a randomized controlled trial. Obes Res. 2004;12(5):789–98. doi:
    1. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. In: Services UDoHaH, editor. Washington, DC: ODPHP Publication; 2008.
    1. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–81.
    1. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [Internet]. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 [cited November 2015]. Available from: .
    1. Mooy JM, Grootenhuis PA, de Vries H, Kostense PJ, Popp-Snijders C, Bouter LM, et al. Intra-individual variation of glucose, specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: the Hoorn Study. Diabetologia. 1996;39(3):298–305.
    1. Utzschneider KM, Prigeon RL, Tong J, Gerchman F, Carr DB, Zraika S, et al. Within-subject variability of measures of beta cell function derived from a 2 h OGTT: implications for research studies. Diabetologia. 2007;50(12):2516–25. doi:
    1. Agresti A CB. Approximate is better than exact for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician. 2007;52(2):119–26.
    1. American Diabetes A. (4) Foundations of care: education, nutrition, physical activity, smoking cessation, psychosocial care, and immunization. Diabetes Care. 2015;38 Suppl:S20–30.
    1. Bouchard C, Daw EW, Rice T, Perusse L, Gagnon J, Province MA, et al. Familial resemblance for VO2max in the sedentary state: the HERITAGE family study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(2):252–8.
    1. Hong Y, Rice T, Gagnon J, Despres JP, Nadeau A, Perusse L, et al. Familial clustering of insulin and abdominal visceral fat: the HERITAGE Family Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(12):4239–45. doi:
    1. Boule NG, Weisnagel SJ, Lakka TA, Tremblay A, Bergman RN, Rankinen T, et al. Effects of exercise training on glucose homeostasis: the HERITAGE Family Study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(1):108–14.
    1. Hecksteden A, Kraushaar J, Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Theisen D, Senn S, Meyer T. Individual response to exercise training—a statistical perspective. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015;118(12):1450–9.
    1. Ranawana V, Monro JA, Mishra S, Henry CJ. Degree of particle size breakdown during mastication may be a possible cause of interindividual glycemic variability. Nutr Res. 2010;30(4):246–54. doi:
    1. Valdes CT, Elkind-Hirsch KE. Intravenous glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity changes during the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72(3):642–6. doi:

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren