Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions

Marion McAllister, Graham Dunn, Katherine Payne, Linda Davies, Chris Todd, Marion McAllister, Graham Dunn, Katherine Payne, Linda Davies, Chris Todd

Abstract

Background: Health policy in the UK and elsewhere is prioritising patient empowerment and patient evaluations of healthcare. Patient reported outcome measures now take centre-stage in implementing strategies to increase patient empowerment. This article argues for consideration of patient empowerment itself as a directly measurable patient reported outcome for chronic conditions, highlights some issues in adopting this approach, and outlines a research agenda to enable healthcare evaluation on the basis of patient empowerment.

Discussion: Patient empowerment is not a well-defined construct. A range of condition-specific and generic patient empowerment questionnaires have been developed; each captures a different construct e.g. personal control, self-efficacy/self-mastery, and each is informed by a different implicit or explicit theoretical framework. This makes it currently problematic to conduct comparative evaluations of healthcare services on the basis of patient empowerment. A case study (clinical genetics) is used to (1) illustrate that patient empowerment can be a valued healthcare outcome, even if patients do not obtain health status benefits, (2) provide a rationale for conducting work necessary to tighten up the patient empowerment construct (3) provide an exemplar to inform design of interventions to increase patient empowerment in chronic disease. Such initiatives could be evaluated on the basis of measurable changes in patient empowerment, if the construct were properly operationalised as a patient reported outcome measure. To facilitate this, research is needed to develop an appropriate and widely applicable generic theoretical framework of patient empowerment to inform (re)development of a generic measure. This research should include developing consensus between patients, clinicians and policymakers about the content and boundaries of the construct before operationalisation. This article also considers a number of issues for society and for healthcare providers raised by adopting the patient empowerment paradigm.

Summary: Healthcare policy is driving the need to consider patient empowerment as a measurable patient outcome from healthcare services. Research is needed to (1) tighten up the construct (2) develop consensus about what is important to include (3) (re)develop a generic measure of patient empowerment for use in evaluating healthcare (4) understand if/how people make trade-offs between empowerment and gain in health status.

References

    1. Payne K, McAllister M, Davies L. Valuing the economic benefits of complex interventions: when maximising health is not sufficient. Health Econ. 2012. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Kleinmann A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and the human condition. Basic Books, US; 1988.
    1. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient Participation in Decision-Making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:329–39. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-8.
    1. Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Pat Ed Counsel. 2005;57:153–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.008.
    1. Aujoulat I, D’Hoore W, Deccache A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Pat Ed Counsel. 2007;66:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008.
    1. Aujoulat I, Marcolongo R, Bonadiman L, Deccache A. Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: A critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:1228–39. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.034.
    1. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa FJ, Armas J. Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:641–51. doi: 10.1177/0145721709335006.
    1. Lorig K, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:1–7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.
    1. Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Patient Empowerment: A Look Back, A Look Ahead. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29:454–64. doi: 10.1177/014572170302900310.
    1. National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking. 2005. [ ] (accessed 4 April 2012)
    1. Sen A. Capability and well-being. In The Quality of Life Edited byNussbaum MC. Clarendon Press, Oxford; 1993.
    1. Coast J, Smith R, Lorgelly P. Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: the spread of ideas in health economics. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1190–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.027.
    1. Coast J, Smith R, Lorgelly P. Should the capability approach be applied in health economics? Health Economics. 2008;17:667–670. doi: 10.1002/hec.1359.
    1. Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–882. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.015.
    1. Zimmerman MA. In: Handbook of Community Psychology. Rapaport J, Seldman E, editor. Plenum, New York; 2000. Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis.
    1. Holmstrom I, Roing M. The relation between patient-centredness and patient empowerment: A discussion of concepts. Pat Ed Counsel. 2009;79:167–72.
    1. Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, Gardner C, Gately C, Rogers A. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a national lay-led self-care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:254–61. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.053538.
    1. Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, Lee V, Reeves D, Richardson G. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust. 2008;189:S21–S24.
    1. Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998;15:165–71. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.165.
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and Testing of a Short Form of the Patient Activation Measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1918–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
    1. Rogers ES, Chamberlain J, Ellison ML, Crean T. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48:1042–7.
    1. Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Fitzgerald JT, Marrero DG. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale: A measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:739–43. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.6.739.
    1. Bulsara C, Styles I, Ward AM, Bulsara M. The Psychometrics of Developing the Patient Empowerment Scale. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24:1–16.
    1. McAllister M, Wood A, Dunn G, Shiloh S, Todd C. The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale: A New Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Clinical Genetics Services. Clinical Genetics. 2011;79:413–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01636.x.
    1. NHS White Paper. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. 2010. [ ] (accessed 14 July 2010)
    1. Department of Health. High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review final report. [ ] (accessed 1 July 2009)
    1. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester; 2007.
    1. Ader DN. Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Med Care. 2007;45((Suppl 1))
    1. Salmon P, Hall GM. Patient empowerment and control: a psychological discourse in the service of medicine. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1969–80. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00063-7.
    1. Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network report, Copenhagen; 2006. [ ] (accessed 4 September 2009)
    1. The George Institute. Realising the potential of patient empowerment for tackling chronic disease: Moving from concept to business as usual. [ ] (accessed 6 January 2012)
    1. McAllister M, Payne K, MacLeod R, Nicholls S, Donnai D, Davies S. Patient Empowerment in Clinical Genetics Services. J Hlth Psychol. 2008;13:895–905.
    1. McAllister M, Dunn G, Todd C. Empowerment: Qualitative Underpinning of a New Patient Reported Outcome for Clinical Genetics Services. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19:125–30. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.160.
    1. Wolfe BJ, Sirois FM. Beyond standard quality of life measures: the subjective experiences of living with inflammatory bowel disease. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:877–86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9362-1.
    1. Byrne R, Davies L, Morrison AP. Priorities and preferences for the outcomes of treatment of psychosis: A service user perspective. Psychosis. 2010;2:210–217. doi: 10.1080/17522430903456913.
    1. George JT, Valdovinos AP, Russell I, Dromgoole P, Lomax S, Torgerson DJ, Wells T, Thowe JC. Clinical effectiveness of a brief educational intervention in Type 1 diabetes: results from the BITES (Brief Intervention in Type 1 diabetes, Education for Self-efficacy) trial. Diabet Med. 2008;25:1447–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02607.x.
    1. Lowe J, Linjawi S, Mensch M, James K, Attia J. Flexible eating and flexible insulin dosing in patients with diabetes: Results of an intensive self-management course. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80:439–43. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.02.003.
    1. McCarrier KP, Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Lewis G, Martin DP, Zimmerman FJ, Goldberg HI. Web-based collaborative care for type 1 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:211–17. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0063.
    1. Tengland P-A. Empowerment: A goal or a means for health promotion? Med Hlth Care & Philosophy. 2007;10:197–207. doi: 10.1007/s11019-006-9027-1.
    1. Elwyn G, Gray J, Clarke A. Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling. J Med Genet. 2000;37:135–138. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.2.135.
    1. Baker RM. Economic rationality and health and lifestyle choices for people with diabetes. Social Science & Medicine. 2006;63:2341–2353. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.007.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren