Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population

Yucel Demiral, Gul Ergor, Belgin Unal, Semih Semin, Yildiz Akvardar, Berna Kivircik, Köksal Alptekin, Yucel Demiral, Gul Ergor, Belgin Unal, Semih Semin, Yildiz Akvardar, Berna Kivircik, Köksal Alptekin

Abstract

Background: SF-36 has been both translated into different languages and adapted to different cultures to obtain comparable data on health status internationally. However there have been only a limited number of studies focused on the discriminative ability of SF-36 regarding social and disease status in developing countries. The aim of this study was to obtain population norms of the short form 36 (SF-36) health survey and the association of SF-36 domains with demographic and socioeconomic variables in an urban population in Turkey.

Methods: A cross-sectional study. Face to face interviews were carried out with a sample of households. The sample was systematically selected from two urban Health Districts in Izmir, Turkey. The study group consisted of 1,279 people selected from a study population of 46,290 people aged 18 and over.

Results: Internal consistencies of the scales were high, with the exception of mental health and vitality. Physical health scales were associated with both age and gender. On the other hand, mental health scales were less strongly associated with age and gender. Women reported poorer health compared to men in general. Social risk factors (employment status, lower education and economic strain) were associated with worse health profiles. The SF-36 was found to be capable of discriminating disease status.

Conclusion: Our findings, cautiously generalisable to urban population, suggest that the SF-36 can be a valuable tool for studies on health outcomes in Turkish population. SF-36 may also be a promising measure for research on health inequalities in Turkey and other developing countries.

References

    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual & interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI, Qualiymetric Incorporated; 2004.
    1. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305:160–164.
    1. Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Mosconi P, Rasmussen NK, Bullinger M, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A. Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: Results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research. 2004;13:283–298. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018472.46236.05.
    1. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplege A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Gandek B, Wagner A, Aaronson N, Bech P, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Ware JE. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:913–923. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00082-1.
    1. Wagner AK, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bullinger M, Bjorner J, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ware JE. Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:925–932. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00083-3.
    1. Brown N, Melville M, Gray D, Young T, Skene AM, Hampton JR. Comparison of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire with the Nottingham Health Profile in long-term survivors of a myocardial infarction. J Public Health Med. 2000;22:167–175. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.167.
    1. Hemingway H, Nicholson A, Stafford M, Roberts R, Marmot M. The impact of socioeconomic status on health functioning as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire: The Whitehall II study. American Journal of Public Health. 1997;87:1484–1490.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bech P, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:1159–1165. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00107-3.
    1. Sullivan M, Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: Results from normative population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:1105–1113. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00102-4.
    1. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:1171–1178. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7.
    1. Loge JH, Kaasa S. Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine. 1998;26:250–258.
    1. Wagner AK, Wyss K, Gandek B, Kilima PM, Lorenz S, Whiting D. A Kiswahili version of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Tanzania: translation and tests of scaling assumptions. Qual Life Res. 1999;8:101–110. doi: 10.1023/A:1026441415079.
    1. Pinar R. Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:259–264. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2393-3.
    1. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Short form 36: A study of a patients with romatoid disorder. . Journal of Drug and Therapy (in Turkish) 1999;12:102–106.
    1. Ware JEJ, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:903–912. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00081-X.
    1. Ware JEJ, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:945–952. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7.
    1. Ware JE, M K, SK K. SF-36 ® Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. 5th. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, Health Assessment Lab, New England Medical Center; 1994.
    1. Gandek B, Ware JE. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:953–959. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00086-9.
    1. Prieto L, Alonso J, Anto JM. Estimating sample sizes for studies using the SF-36 health survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50:473–474.
    1. Chang DF, Chun CA, Takeuchi DT, Shen H. SF-36 health survey: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability in a community sample of Chinese Americans. Med Care. 2000;38:542–548. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200005000-00010.
    1. Ahmed SM, Rana AK, Chowdhury M, Bhuiya A. Measuring perceived health outcomes in non-western culture: does SF-36 have a place? J Health Popul Nutr. 2002;20:334–342.
    1. Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:46–50.
    1. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ. 1993;306:1440–1444.
    1. Fuh JL, Wang SJ, Lu SR, Juang KD, Lee SJ. Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:675–683. doi: 10.1023/A:1008993821633.
    1. Ware JE, Gandek B, Kosinski M, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M, Thunedborg K. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51:1167–1170. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00108-5.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski MAKSD. SF-36 physical & mental health summary scales: a user manual. 5th. Boston,MA, Health Assessment Lab, New England Medical Center; 1994.
    1. Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham P, Grablowsky B. Multivariate data analysis . Tulsa: Petroleum Publishing Company; 1979.
    1. Wyss K, Wagner AK, Whiting D, Mtasiwa DM, Tanner M, Gandek B, Kilima PM. Validation of the Kiswahili version of the SF-36 Health Survey in a representative sample of an urban population in Tanzania. Qual Life Res. 1999;8:111–120. doi: 10.1023/A:1026431727374.
    1. Gandek B, Ware JEJ, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bjorner J, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Sullivan M. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1149–1158. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00106-1.
    1. Marmot M, Feeney A. Socioeconomic factors in CHD prevention. In: Gomer KO and Schneiderman N, editor. Behavioral medicine approaches to cardiovascular disease prevention. NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996. pp. 21–41.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren