Life interrupted and life regained? Coping with stroke at a young age

Kerry Kuluski, Clare Dow, Louise Locock, Renee F Lyons, Daniel Lasserson, Kerry Kuluski, Clare Dow, Louise Locock, Renee F Lyons, Daniel Lasserson

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability across the developed world, affecting an increasing number of younger people. In this article, we seek to understand the experience of stroke as a disabling life situation among young people and the strategies that they use to recover and cope. Directed content analysis was conducted from interviews with 17 community-dwelling stroke survivors aged 55 years and younger across the United Kingdom. The sample was drawn from a larger maximum variation sample of stroke survivors. Using the sociological concepts of biographical disruption and biographical repair as a guide, excerpts from the interviews pertaining to aspects of the patients' life that were interrupted, in addition to how they coped with the changes, were selected and analysed. All individuals described an "altered sense of self," a theme that included loss of identity, family disruption, and/or loss of valued activities. Individuals sought to adapt their sense of self by seeking external support, by restoring normality, and/or through positive reflection. Despite the adapted self that emerged, most individuals continued to experience impairments. While young stroke survivors adapt to their illness over time, they continue to experience impairments and disruptions in their personal and work lives. A holistic model of rehabilitation that helps individuals regain the capacity for everyday activities related to work, family life, and leisure can begin to address the emotional ramifications of diseases such as stroke, restore wellness, and work towards minimizing the burden felt by family caregivers and children.

Keywords: Stroke; coping; patient experience; qualitative; young.

References

    1. Bendz M. The first year of rehabilitation after a stroke—From two perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2003;17(3):215–222.
    1. Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1982;4(2):167–182.
    1. Charmaz K. Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1983;5:168–195.
    1. Charmaz K. Struggling for a self: Identity levels of the chronically ill. Research in the Sociology of Health Care. 1987;6:283–321.
    1. Charmaz K. Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1991.
    1. Charmaz K. Identity dilemmas of chronically ill men. The Sociological Quarterly. 1994;35(2):269–288.
    1. Charmaz K. The body, identity, and self: Adapting to impairment. Sociological Quarterly. 1995;36(4):657–680.
    1. Connolly K, Myers J. Wellness and mattering: The role of holistic factors in job satisfaction. Journal of Employment Counselling. 2003;40(4):152–160.
    1. Daniel K, Wolfe C. D, Busch M. A, McKevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):431–e440.
    1. Faircloth C. A, Boylstein C, Rittman M, Young M. E, Gubrium J. Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociology Health & Illness. 2004;26(2):242–261.
    1. Frank A. The rhetoric of self-change: Illness experience as narrative. The Sociological Quarterly. 1993;32(1):39–52.
    1. Frank A. The wounded storyteller: Body, illness and ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995.
    1. Frank A. O. Starting vocational rehabilitation early after stroke. BMJ. 2013;347:f4278.
    1. George M. G, Tong X, Kuklina E. V, Labarthe D. R. Trends in stroke hospitalizations and associated risk factors among children and young adults, 1995–2008. Annals of Neurology. 2011;70(5):713–721.
    1. Hsieh H. F, Shannon S. E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
    1. Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman H. C, Joice S, Scott C. L, MacWalter R. S, et al. Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: Randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain. 2011;134(Pt. 5):1373–1386.
    1. Jullamate P, De Azeredo Z, Paul C, Subgranon R. Informal stroke rehabilitation: What do Thai caregivers perform? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2006;29(4):309–314.
    1. Kersten P, Low J. T, Ashburn A, George S. L, McLellan D. L. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: Results of a national UK survey. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002;24(16):860–866.
    1. Lawrence M. Young adults’ experience of stroke: A qualitative review of the literature. The British Journal of Nursing. 2010;19(4):241–248.
    1. Lindsay M. P, Gubitz G, Bayley M, Hill M. D, Davies-Schinkel C, Singh S, et al. Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care (update 2010) Ottawa, ON: On behalf of the Canadian Stroke Strategy Best Practices and Standards Writing Group; 2010.
    1. Locock L, Ziebland S, Dumelow C. Biographical disruption, abruption and repair in the context of motor neurone disease. Sociology Health & Illness. 2009;31(7):1043–1058.
    1. Lyons R, Rudd A, Alvaro C. Advances in health policy. Stroke. 2007;39(2):264–267.
    1. Lyons R, Sullivan J, Ritvo P, Coyne J. Relationships in chronic illness and disability relationships in chronic illness and disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
    1. Morris R. The psychology of stroke in young adults: The roles of service provision and return to work. Stroke Research and Treatment. 2011;2011:534812.
    1. Murray J, Young J, Forster A, Ashworth R. Developing a primary care-based stroke model: The prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by patients and carers. The British Journal of General Practice. 2003;53(495):803–807.
    1. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Illness in the context of older age: The case of stroke. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1998;20(4):489–506.
    1. Roding J, Lindstrom B, Malm J, Ohman A. Frustrated and invisible—Younger stroke patients’ experiences of the rehabilitation process. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2003;25(15):867–874.
    1. Rothwell P. M, Coull A. J, Silver L. E, Fairhead J. F, Giles M. F, Lovelock C. E, et al. Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study) Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1773–1783.
    1. Rutten-Jacobs L. C, Arntz R. M, Maaijwee N. A, Schoonderwaldt H. C, Dorresteijn L. D, Van Dijk E. J, et al. Long-term mortality after stroke among adults aged 18 to 50 years. JAMA. 2013;309(11):1136–1144.
    1. Schaapsmeerders P, Maaijwee N. A, Van Dijk E. J, Rutten-Jacobs L. C, Arntz R. M, Schoonderwaldt H. C. Long-term cognitive impairment after first-ever ischemic stroke in young adults. Stroke. 2013;44(6):1621–1628.
    1. Singhal A. B, Biller J, Elkind M. S, Fullerton H. J, Jauch E. C, Kittner S. J, et al. Recognition and management of stroke in young adults and adolescents. Neurology. 2013;81(12):1089–1097.
    1. Stroke Association. Struggling to recover: Life after stroke campaign briefing. London: Author; 2012.
    1. Teasell R. W, McRae M. P, Finestone H. M. Social issues in the rehabilitation of younger stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000;81(2):205–209.
    1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012 Stroke statistics. Retrieved from
    1. Varona J. F, Bermejo F, Guerra J. M, Molina J. A. Long-term prognosis of ischemic stroke in young adults. Study of 272 cases. Journal of Neurology. 2004;251(12):1507–1514.
    1. Williams G. The genesis of chronic illness: Narrative re-construction. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1984;6(2):175–200.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren