Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in insulin-treated individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk: The ODYSSEY DM-INSULIN randomized trial

Lawrence A Leiter, Bertrand Cariou, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Helen M Colhoun, Stefano Del Prato, Francisco J Tinahones, Kausik K Ray, Maja Bujas-Bobanovic, Catherine Domenger, Jonas Mandel, Rita Samuel, Robert R Henry, Lawrence A Leiter, Bertrand Cariou, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Helen M Colhoun, Stefano Del Prato, Francisco J Tinahones, Kausik K Ray, Maja Bujas-Bobanovic, Catherine Domenger, Jonas Mandel, Rita Samuel, Robert R Henry

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in participants with type 2 (T2D) or type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with insulin who have elevated LDL cholesterol levels despite maximally tolerated statin therapy.

Methods: Participants at high cardiovascular risk with T2D (n = 441) or T1D (n = 76) and LDL cholesterol levels ≥1.8 mmol/L (≥70 mg/dL) were randomized 2:1 to alirocumab:placebo administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks, for 24 weeks' double-blind treatment. Alirocumab-treated participants received 75 mg every 2 weeks, with blinded dose increase to 150 mg every 2 weeks at week 12 if week 8 LDL cholesterol levels were ≥1.8 mmol/L. Primary endpoints were percentage change in calculated LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 24, and safety assessments.

Results: Alirocumab reduced LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 24 by a mean ± standard error of 49.0% ± 2.7% and 47.8% ± 6.5% vs placebo (both P < .0001) in participants with T2D and T1D, respectively. Significant reductions were observed in non-HDL cholesterol (P < .0001), apolipoprotein B (P < .0001) and lipoprotein (a) (P ≤ .0039). At week 24, 76.4% and 70.2% of the alirocumab group achieved LDL cholesterol <1.8 mmol/L in the T2D and T1D populations (P < .0001), respectively. Glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose levels remained stable for the study duration. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 64.5% of alirocumab- vs 64.1% of placebo-treated individuals (overall population).

Conclusions: Alirocumab produced significant LDL cholesterol reductions in participants with insulin-treated diabetes regardless of diabetes type, and was generally well tolerated. Concomitant administration of alirocumab and insulin did not raise any safety concerns (NCT02585778).

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; clinical trial; lipid-lowering therapy; type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

L. A. L. has received personal fees from Aegerion, grants and personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi, and grants from Kowa and the Medicines Company, outside of this submitted work. B. C. has received research funding and personal fees from Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. during the conduct of the study, research funding from Pfizer, and honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, MSD (Merck & Co.), Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Takeda outside of this submitted work. D. M.‐W. has received speakers' bureau and consultant/advisory board fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD (Merck & Co.), Novartis, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. H. M. C. has received grants, personal fees and non‐financial support from Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. during the conduct of this study, grants, personal fees and non‐financial support from Eli Lilly and Company, and grants from Roche Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Bayer, outside of this submitted work. S. D. P. has received research funding from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Co., MSD (Merck & Co.) and Novo Nordisk, and has been a consultant for or received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Laboratoires Servier, MSD (Merck & Co.), Novartis Pharmaceuticals Co., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi‐Aventis and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. F. J. T. has received speakers' bureau and consultant/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, MSD (Merck & Co.), Novartis Pharmaceuticals Co., Novo Nordisk and Sanofi‐Aventis. K. K. R. has received personal fees (data safety monitoring board) from AbbVie Inc., consultant fees/honoraria from Aegerion, Algorithm, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerenis, Eli Lilly and Company, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, the Medicines Company, MSD (Merck & Co.), Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Reservlogix, Sanofi and Takeda, and research grants from Kowa, Pfizer and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M. B.‐B. and C. D. are employees of and shareholders in Sanofi. J. M. is an employee of IviData Stats, contracted to Sanofi. R. S. is an employee of and shareholder in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. R. R. H. has received research funding from Eli Lilly and Company, Fuji Chemicals, Hitachi, Lexicon, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Viacyte, and has been a consultant and advisory panel member for Alere Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Elcelyx, Intarcia, Ionis, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson and Sanofi‐Aventis.

The authors were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions, were involved in all stages of manuscript development, and have approved the final version.

© 2017 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram. ADA, antidrug antibody; ITT, intention‐to‐treat
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent change from baseline in LDL cholesterol over time per treatment randomization. A, Participants with T2D. B, Participants with T1D (intention‐to‐treat analysis)

References

    1. de Ferranti SD, de Boer IH, Fonseca V, et al. Type 1 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. Circulation. 2014;130:1110–1130.
    1. Rydén L, Grant PJ, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre‐diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre‐diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3035–3087.
    1. Mooradian AD. Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2009;5:150–159.
    1. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Diabetes and Dyslipidemia. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, et al., eds. Endotext: South Dartmouth, MA: Inc; 2000.
    1. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2999–3058.
    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaborators , Kearney PM, Blackwell L, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol‐lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2008;371:117–125.
    1. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2387–2397.
    1. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:685–696.
    1. Jacobson TA, Ito MK, Maki KC, et al. National lipid association recommendations for patient‐centered management of dyslipidemia: part 1 — full report. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9:129–169.
    1. American Diabetes Association . 9. Cardiovascular disease and risk management. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:S75–S87.
    1. Wong ND, Chuang J, Zhao Y, Rosenblit PD. Residual dyslipidemia according to low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B among statin‐treated US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009‐2010. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9:525–532.
    1. Leiter LA, Lundman P, da Silva PM, et al. Persistent lipid abnormalities in statin‐treated patients with diabetes mellitus in Europe and Canada: results of the Dyslipidaemia International Study. Diabet Med. 2011;28:1343–1351.
    1. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, et al. EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16:121–137.
    1. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1489–1499.
    1. Leiter L, Tinahones FJ, Karalis D, et al. Alirocumab safety in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: pooled data from 14 ODYSSEY trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1674.
    1. Leiter LA, Zamorano JL, Bujas‐Bobanovic M, et al. Lipid‐lowering efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with or without diabetes: a sub‐analysis of ODYSSEY COMBO II. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:989–996.
    1. Schmidt AF, Swerdlow DI, Holmes MV, et al. PCSK9 genetic variants and risk of type 2 diabetes: a mendelian randomisation study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:97–105.
    1. Ference BA, Robinson JG, Brook RD, et al. Variation in PCSK9 and HMGCR and risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2144–2153.
    1. Lotta LA, Sharp SJ, Burgess S, et al. Association between low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol‐lowering genetic variants and risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1383–1391.
    1. Cariou B, Leiter LA, Müller‐Wieland D, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in insulin‐treated patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk: rationale and design of the ODYSSEY DM‐INSULIN trial. Diabetes Metab. 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Tatlock S, Arbuckle R, Sanchez R, et al. Psychometric evaluation of a treatment acceptance measure for use in patients receiving treatment via subcutaneous injection. Value Health. 2017;20:430–440.
    1. Roth EM, Goldberg AC, Catapano AL, et al. Antidrug antibodies in patients treated with alirocumab. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1589–1590.
    1. Siddiqui O, Hung HM, O'Neill R. MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets. J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19:227–246.
    1. National Research Council . The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
    1. Sattar N, Preiss D, Robinson JG, et al. Lipid‐lowering efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab (AMG 145) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:403–410.
    1. Navar AM, Steen D, Wojdyla D, et al. Recurrent cardiovascular event rates in a contemporary cohort of 829,498 adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:59.
    1. Farnier M, Gaudet D, Valcheva V, Minini P, Miller K, Cariou B. Efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk populations with or without heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: pooled analysis of eight ODYSSEY phase 3 clinical program trials. Int J Cardiol. 2016;223:750–757.
    1. Kastelein JJ, Kereiakes DJ, Cannon CP, et al. Effect of alirocumab dose increase on LDL lowering and lipid goal attainment in patients with dyslipidemia. Coron Artery Dis. 2017;28:190–197.
    1. Ridker PM, Pradhan A, MacFadyen JG, Libby P, Glynn RJ. Cardiovascular benefits and diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: an analysis from the JUPITER trial. Lancet. 2012;380:565–571.
    1. Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta‐analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet. 2010;375:735–742.
    1. Preiss D, Seshasai SR, Welsh P, et al. Risk of incident diabetes with intensive‐dose compared with moderate‐dose statin therapy: a meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2011;305:2556–2564.
    1. Langhi C, Le May C, Gmyr V, et al. PCSK9 is expressed in pancreatic delta‐cells and does not alter insulin secretion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390:1288–1293.
    1. Cariou B, Si‐Tayeb K, Le May C. Role of PCSK9 beyond liver involvement. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2015;26:155–161.
    1. Colhoun HM, Ginsberg HN, Robinson JG, et al. No effect of PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab on the incidence of diabetes in a pooled analysis from 10 ODYSSEY phase 3 studies. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2981–2989.
    1. Blom DJ, Koren MJ, Roth E, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and glycaemic effects of evolocumab (AMG 145) in hypercholesterolaemic patients stratified by glycaemic status and metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:98–107.
    1. Vergès B, Duvillard L, Brindisi MC, et al. Lack of association between plasma PCSK9 and LDL‐apoB100 catabolism in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:342–348.
    1. Jones PH, Bays HE, Chaudhari U, et al. Safety of alirocumab (a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody) from 14 randomized trials. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:1805–1811.
    1. Roth EM, Bujas‐Bobanovic M, Louie MJ, Cariou B. Patient and physician perspectives on mode of administration of the PCSK9 monoclonal antibody alirocumab, an injectable medication to lower LDL‐C levels. Clin Ther. 2015;37:1945–1954.e6.
    1. Schwartz GG, Bessac L, Berdan LG, et al. Effect of alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, on long‐term cardiovascular outcomes following acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the ODYSSEY outcomes trial. Am Heart J. 2014;168:682–689.
    1. Sabatine MS, Leiter LA, Wiviott SD, et al. Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new‐onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017. [Epub ahead of print].

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren