Comparison of VerifyNow-P2Y12 test and Flow Cytometry for monitoring individual platelet response to clopidogrel. What is the cut-off value for identifying patients who are low responders to clopidogrel therapy?

Cosmo Godino, Loredana Mendolicchio, Filippo Figini, Azeem Latib, Andrew Sp Sharp, John Cosgrave, Giliola Calori, Michela Cera, Alaide Chieffo, Alfredo Castelli, Attilio Maseri, Zaverio M Ruggeri, Antonio Colombo, Cosmo Godino, Loredana Mendolicchio, Filippo Figini, Azeem Latib, Andrew Sp Sharp, John Cosgrave, Giliola Calori, Michela Cera, Alaide Chieffo, Alfredo Castelli, Attilio Maseri, Zaverio M Ruggeri, Antonio Colombo

Abstract

Background: Dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine (DAT) is used to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Low response to clopidogrel therapy (LR) occurs, but laboratory tests have a controversial role in the identification of this condition.

Methods: We studied LR in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI, all on DAT for at least 7 days, by comparing: 1) Flow cytometry (FC) to measure platelet membrane expression of P-selectin (CD62P) and PAC-1 binding following double stimulation with ADP and collagen type I either in the presence of prostaglandin (PG) E1; 2) VerifyNow-P2Y12 test, in which results are reported as absolute P2Y12-Reaction-Units (PRU) or % of inhibition (% inhibition).

Results: Thirty controls and 52 patients were analyzed. The median percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding by FC evaluation after stimulation in the presence of PG E1 was 25.4% (IQR: 21.4-33.1%) and 3.5% (1.7-9.4%), respectively. Only 6 patients receiving DAT (11.5%) had both values above the 1st quartile of controls, and were defined as LR. Evaluation of the same patients with the VerifyNow-P2Y12 test revealed that the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p < 0.0001) for % inhibition and 0.85 (0.72-0.93, p < 0.005) for PRU. Cut-off values of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU gave the maximum accuracy for the detection of patients defined as having LR by FC.

Conclusion: In conclusion our findings show that a cut-off value of ≤ 15% inhibition or > 213 PRU in the VerifyNow-P2Y12 test may provide the best accuracy for the identification of patients with LR.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves defining the sensitivity and specificity of the VerifyNow-P2Y12 test in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Sensitivity and specificity in discriminating responders from non-responders to treatment was based on the arbitrary definition of positive patients (Low responders to clopidogrel; n = 6) and negative patients (High plus Intermediate responders to clopidogrel; n = 46) based on the percentage of platelets exhibiting CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding after stimulation in the presence of PG E1. The two curves shown here, for results expressed as PRU (absolute P2Y12 Reaction Unit) and % of inhibition (% inhibition), respectively, define cut-off values of PRU > 213 and ≤ 15% inhibition, as those giving the highest accuracy (minimal false negative and positive results) in the VerifyNow-P2Y12 test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between the results obtained by flow cytometric evaluation of platelet activation parameters and VerifyNow-P2Y12 test in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The percent of inhibition (% inhibition) was plotted against the percentage of platelets that expressed P-selectin (CD62P) after stimulation with 20 μM ADP and 5 μg/mL collagen type I for 110 min at room temperature in the presence of 1 μM PG E1. (§) First quartile of control values for CD62P expression. Patients receiving antiplatelet therapy with levels of CD62P expression and PAC-1 binding above this limit were defined as "Low-responder"; those with both values below this limit were defined as "High-Responder"; those with one value above and the other below the corresponding limit were defined as "Intermediate-responder". ($) Cut-off value for % of inhibition in the VerifyNow-P2Y12 test giving minimal false negative and positive results (see Figure 1).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between the results obtained by flow cytometric evaluation of platelet activation parameters and VerifyNow-P2Y12 test in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The percent of inhibition (% inhibition) was plotted against the percentage of platelets that expressed bound PAC-1 after stimulation with 20 μM ADP and 5 μg/mL collagen type I for 110 min at room temperature in the presence of 1 μM PG E1. (§) First quartile of control values for PAC-1 binding. The others abbreviations as reported in the Figure 2.

References

    1. Pereillo J-M, Maftouh M, Andrieu A, Uzabiaga M-F, Fedeli O, Savi P, Pascal M, Herbert J-M, Maffrand J-P, Picard C. Structure and stereochemistry of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Drug Metab Dispo. 2002;30:1288–1295. doi: 10.1124/dmd.30.11.1288.
    1. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJG, Bertrand ME, Lewis BS, Natarajan MK, Malmberg K, Rupprecht HJ, Zhao F, Chrolavicius S. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The PCI-CURE study. The Lancet. 2001;358:527–533. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05701-4.
    1. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK, Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events Trial Investigators Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without st-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010746.
    1. Airoldi F, Colombo A, Morici N, Latib A, Cosgrave J, Buellesfeld L, Bonizzoni E, Carlino M, Gerckens U, Godino C, et al. Incidence and predictors of drug-eluting stent thrombosis during and after discontinuation of thienopyridine treatment. Circulation. 2007;116:745–754. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.686048.
    1. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Colombo A, Dawkins KD, Grube E, Cutlip DE, Friedman M, Baim DS, Koglin J. Offsetting impact of thrombosis and restenosis on the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction after paclitaxel-eluting and bare metal stent implantation. Circulation. 2007;115:2842–2847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.687186.
    1. Serebruany VL, Oshrine BR, Malinin AI, Atar D, Michelson AD, Ferguson JJ. Noncompliance in cardiovascular clinical trials. Am Heart. 2005;150:882–886. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.039.
    1. Nguyen TA, Diodati JG, Pharand C. Resistance to clopidogrel: A review of the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1157–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.034.
    1. Lev EI, Patel RT, Maresh KJ, Guthikonda S, Granada J, DeLao T, Bray PF, Kleiman NS. Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention the role of dual drug resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.058.
    1. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, Ramírez C, Barrera-Ramirez C, Sabaté M, Hernández R, Moreno R, Escaned J, Alfonso F, et al. Identification of low responders to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting. Thrombosis Research. 2005;115:101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.07.007.
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, O'Connor CM. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: Response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation. 2003;107:2908–2913. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072771.11429.83.
    1. Matetzky S, Shenkman B, Guetta V, Shechter M, Bienart R, Goldenberg I, Novikov I, Pres H, Savion N, Varon D, Hod H. Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109:3171–3175. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130846.46168.03.
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Guyer K, Cho PW, Zaman KA, Kreutz RP, Bassi AK, Tantry US. Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting results of the prepare post-stenting study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1820–1826. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.041.
    1. Michelson AD, Frelinger AL, Furman MI. Current options in platelet function testing. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:4N–10N. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.008.
    1. Geiger J, Teichmann L, Grossmann R, Aktas B, Steigerwald U, Walter U, Schinzel R. Monitoring of clopidogrel action: Comparison of methods. Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:957–965. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.047050.
    1. Price MJ, Endemann S, Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Stinis CT, Levisay JP, Ernst A, Sawhney NS, Schatz RA, Teirstein PS. Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:992–1000. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn046.
    1. Patti G, Nusca A, Mangiacapra F, Gatto L, D'Ambrosio A, Di Sciascio G. Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1128–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.038.
    1. Marcucci R, Gori AM, Paniccia R, Giusti B, Valente S, Giglioli C, Buonamici P, Antoniucci D, Abbate R, Gensini GF. Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to adp detected by a point-of-care assay: A 12-month follow-up. Circulation. 2009;119:237–242. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812636.
    1. Schmitz G, Rothe G, Ruf A, Barlage S, Tschope D, Clemetson KJ, Goodall AH, Michelson AD, Nurden AT, Shankey TV. European working group on clinical cell analysis: Consensus protocol for the flow cytometric characterisation of platelet function. Thromb Haemost. 1998;79:885–896.
    1. Shattil SJ, Cunningham M, Hoxie JA. Detection of activated platelets in whole blood using activation-dependent monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry. Blood. 1987;70:307–315.
    1. von Beckerath N, Pogatsa-Murray G, Wieczorek A, Sibbing D, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Correlation of a new point-of-care test with conventional optical aggregometry for the assessment of clopidogrel responsiveness. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:910–911.
    1. Zou KH, O'Malley AJ, Mauri L. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation. 2007;115:654–657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594929.
    1. Angiolillo DJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E, Ramirez C, Sabate M, Banuelos C, Hernandez-Antolin R, Escaned J, Moreno R, Alfonso F, et al. High clopidogrel loading dose during coronary stenting: Effects on drug response and interindividual variability. European Heart Journal. 2004;25:1903–1910. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.036.
    1. Lordkipanidzé M, Pharand C, Nguyen TA, Schampaert E, Diodati JG. Assessment of verifynow P2Y12 assay accuracy in evaluating clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 2008;30:372–378. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181757c59.
    1. Gurbel PA, Becker RC, Mann KG, Steinhubl SR, Michelson AD. Platelet function monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1822–1834. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.051.
    1. Aleil B, Ravanat C, Cazenave JP, Rochoux G, Heitz A, Gachet C. Flow cytometric analysis of intraplatelet vasp phosphorylation for the detection of clopidogrel resistance in patients with ischemic cardiovascular diseases. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:85–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.01063.x.
    1. Van Werkum JW, Stelt CAK Van Der, Seesing TH, Hackeng CM, Ten Berg JM. A head-to-head comparison between the verifynow P2Y12 assay and light transmittance aggregometry for monitoring the individual platelet response to clopidogrel in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:2516–2518. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02187.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren