Neuropsychological sequelae of haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Investigators of the HUS Cognitive Study

A Schlieper, E Orrbine, G A Wells, M Clulow, P N McLaine, P C Rowe, A Schlieper, E Orrbine, G A Wells, M Clulow, P N McLaine, P C Rowe

Abstract

Background: Severe haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) in childhood can cause stroke, hemiplegia, cortical blindness, and psychomotor retardation. These outcomes are evident at the time of discharge immediately after the acute illness. Less is known about the neuropsychological outcomes of less severely affected children who recover from acute HUS.

Aims: This multicentre case control study investigated the hypothesis that children who survive an acute episode of HUS without recognizable neurological injuries have greater impairment of cognitive, academic, and behavioural functions than controls.

Design: Children with HUS were eligible if they had no evidence of severe neurological dysfunction when discharged from one of six Canadian hospitals. Controls had been admitted to hospital for a non-HUS illness and were matched by age, sex, first language, and socioeconomic status. All subjects underwent evaluation of behaviour, academic achievement, cognitive function, and verbal abilities using standardised tests administered by a psychometrist blinded to the case or control status.

Results: Ninety-one case control pairs were enrolled. No important differences between patients with HUS and paired controls were evident on tests of IQ, behaviour, verbal abilities, or academic achievement. There was no increased risk of attention deficit disorder among patients with HUS. There was no correlation between the severity of acute renal failure and neuropsychological measures, although scores on some verbal ability tests were lower in those with the highest serum creatinine concentrations during illness.

Conclusions: Children discharged from hospital without apparent neurological injury after an episode of acute HUS do not have an increased risk of subclinical problems with learning, behaviour, or attention.

References

    1. J Pediatr. 1991 Aug;119(2):218-24
    1. Pediatr Nephrol. 1990 Jan;4(1):11-5
    1. J Pediatr. 1964 Apr;64:478-91
    1. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1955 Sep 20;85(38-39):905-9
    1. Pediatr Nephrol. 1996 Aug;10(4):504-6
    1. J Pediatr. 1998 May;132(5):777-82
    1. Public Health Rep. 1970 Sep;85(9):815-27
    1. J Pediatr. 1971 Mar;78(3):420-5
    1. Aust Paediatr J. 1971 Mar;7(1):28-33
    1. Nephron. 1973;11(2):174-92
    1. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1976 Aug;18(4):447-59
    1. Pediatrics. 1980 Jan;65(1):115-20
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1980 Sep;134(9):869-72
    1. J Pediatr. 1983 Mar;102(3):402-4
    1. Lancet. 1983 Mar 19;1(8325):619-20
    1. J Pediatr. 1984 Jun;104(6):819-25
    1. Ann Neurol. 1986 Jan;19(1):90-3
    1. J Pediatr. 1987 Dec;111(6 Pt 1):863-6
    1. J Child Neurol. 1989 Apr;4(2):108-13
    1. Can J Public Health. 1990 May-Jun;81(3):232-3
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Jul;67(7):930-4

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren