Scaling-up exclusive breastfeeding support programmes: the example of KwaZulu-Natal

Chris Desmond, Ruth M Bland, Gerard Boyce, Hoosen M Coovadia, Anna Coutsoudis, Nigel Rollins, Marie-Louise Newell, Chris Desmond, Ruth M Bland, Gerard Boyce, Hoosen M Coovadia, Anna Coutsoudis, Nigel Rollins, Marie-Louise Newell

Abstract

Background: Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for six months is the mainstay of global child health and the preferred feeding option for HIV-infected mothers for whom replacement feeding is inappropriate. Promotion of community-level EBF requires effective personnel and management to ensure quality counselling and support for women. We present a costing and cost effectiveness analysis of a successful intervention to promote EBF in high HIV prevalence area in South Africa, and implications for scale-up in the province of KwaZulu-Natal.

Methods and findings: The costing of the intervention as implemented was calculated, in addition to the modelling of the costs and outcomes associated with running the intervention at provincial level under three different scenarios: full intervention (per protocol), simplified version (half the number of visits compared to the full intervention; more clinic compared to home visits) and basic version (one third the number of visits compared to the full intervention; all clinic and no home visits). Implementation of the full scenario costs R95 million ($14 million) per annum; the simplified version R47 million ($7 million) and the basic version R4 million ($2 million). Although the cost of the basic scenario is less than one tenth of the cost of the simplified scenario, modelled effectiveness of the full and simplified versions suggest they would be 10 times more effective compared to the basic intervention. A further analysis modelled the costs per increased month of EBF due to each intervention: R337 ($48), R206 ($29), and R616 ($88) for the full, simplified and basic scenarios respectively. In addition to the average cost effectiveness the incremental cost effectiveness ratios associated with moving from the less effective scenarios to the more effective scenarios were calculated and reported: Nothing-Basic R616 ($88), Basic-Simplified R162 ($23) and Simplified-Full R879 ($126).

Conclusions: The simplified scenario, with a combination of clinic and home visits, is the most efficient in terms of cost per increased month of EBF and has the lowest incremental cost effectiveness ratio.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Intervention entrants.
Figure 1. Intervention entrants.
Figure 2. Activities and outcomes.
Figure 2. Activities and outcomes.

References

    1. WHO. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding.
    1. WHO. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Nutrient adequacy of exclusive breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life. .
    1. WHO. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Report of an expert consultation. .
    1. WHO. Effect of breastfeeding on infant and child mortality due to infectious diseases in less developed countries: a pooled analysis. WHO Collaborative Study Team on the Role of Breastfeeding on the Prevention of Infant Mortality. Lancet. 2000;355:451–455.
    1. Schack-Nielson L, Michaelsen K. Breast feeding and future health. Curr Opin Clin Nutri Metab Care. 2006;9:289–296.
    1. Coovadia H, Rollins N, Bland R, Little K, Coutsoudis A, et al. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection during exclusive breastfeeding: the first six months of life. Lancet. 2007;369:1607–1616.
    1. Illiff P, Piwoz E, Tavengwa NV, Zunguza CD, Marinda ET, et al. Early exclusive breastfeeding reduces the risk of postnatal HIV-1 transmission and increases HIV-free survival. AIDS. 2005;19:699–708.
    1. Creek T. Role of infant feeding and HIV in a severe outbreak of diarrhoea and malnutrition among young children - Botswana 2006; Durban, South Africa. Abstract #LB1, 2006 2006
    1. Taha T, Kumwenda N, Hoover D, Kafulafula G, Fiscus S, et al. The impact of breastfeeding on the health of HIV-positive mothers and their children in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull WHO. 2006;84:546–554.
    1. Thior I, Lockman S, Smeaton L, Shapiro R, Wester C, et al. Breastfeeding plus infant zidovudine prophylaxis for 6 months vs formula feeding plus infant zidovudine for 1 month to reduce mother-to-child transmission in Botswana. JAMA. 2006;296:794–805.
    1. Coutinho S, Cabral de Lira P, de Carvalho Lima M, Ashworth A. Comparison of the effect of two systems for the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding. Lancet. 2005;366:1094–1100.
    1. Haider R, Ashworth A, Kabir I, Huttly SR. Effect of community-based peer counsellors on exclusive breastfeeding practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1643–1647.
    1. Morrow AL, Guerrero ML, Shults J, Calva JJ, Lutter C, et al. Efficacy of home-based peer counselling to promote exclusive breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1226–1231.
    1. Bland R, Becquet R, Rollins N, Coutsoudis A, Coovadia H, et al. Breast health problems are rare in both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women who receive counseling and support for breast-feeding in South Africa. CID. 2007;45:1502–1510.
    1. Bland R, Little K, Coovadia H, Coutsoudis A, Rollins N, et al. AIDS In Press; 2008. Intervention to promote exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life in a high HIV prevalence area.
    1. Bland R, Rollins N, Coovadia H, Coutsoudis A, Newell M. Infant feeding counselling for HIV-infected and uninfected women: appropriateness of choice and practice. Bull WHO. 2007;85:289–296.
    1. Rice B, Batzing-Feigenbaum J, Hosegood V, Tanser F, Hill C, et al. Population and antenatal-based HIV prevalence estimates in a high contracepting female population in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(1):160.
    1. UNAIDS/WHO. AIDS Epidemic Update. www/ UNAIDS, Geneva. 2005.
    1. WHO/UNICEF. Breastfeeding counselling: A training course. Trainer's Guide: World Health Organization, Geneva. 1993.
    1. WHO/UNICEF/UNAIDS. HIV and infant feeding counselling: a training course. Trainers' Guide. 2000.
    1. Skordis J, Nattrass N. Paying to waste lives: the affordability of reducing mother-to-child transmission of HIV in South Africa. Journal of Health Economics. 2000;21:405–421.
    1. Sweat M, O'Reilly K, Schmid G, Denison J, de Zoysa I. Cost-effectiveness of nevirapine to prevent mother-to-child transmission in eight African countries. AIDS. 2004;18(12):20, 1661–1771.
    1. KwaZulu Natal Provincial Department of Health. Protocol for the phased implementation of a comprehensive package of care for the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV in KwaZulu Natal. Version 4ed. 2003
    1. Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes:
    1. KwaZulu Natal Provincial Government, 2006. Provincial Salary Scales. Facsimile Correspondence, 20th November 2006. Provincial Salaries Department, Pietermaritzburg
    1. Bland R, Rollins N, Coutsoudis A, Coovadia H. Breastfeeding practices in an area of high HIV prevalence in rural South Africa. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91:704–711.
    1. Chopra M, Piwoz E, Senwana J, Schaay N, Dunnett L, et al. Effect of a mother-to-child HIV prevention programme on infant feeding and caring practices in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2002;92:298–302.
    1. Latham M, Kisanga P. UNICEF ESARO; 2001. Current status of protection, support and promotion of breastfeeding in four African countries.
    1. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? Lancet. 2003;361:2–10.
    1. Jones G, Steketee R, Black RE, Bhutta Z, Morris S, et al. How many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet. 2003;362:11–17.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren