Implementing an mHealth system for substance use disorders in primary care: a mixed methods study of clinicians' initial expectations and first year experiences

Marie-Louise Mares, David H Gustafson, Joseph E Glass, Andrew Quanbeck, Helene McDowell, Fiona McTavish, Amy K Atwood, Lisa A Marsch, Chantelle Thomas, Dhavan Shah, Randall Brown, Andrew Isham, Mary Jane Nealon, Victoria Ward, Marie-Louise Mares, David H Gustafson, Joseph E Glass, Andrew Quanbeck, Helene McDowell, Fiona McTavish, Amy K Atwood, Lisa A Marsch, Chantelle Thomas, Dhavan Shah, Randall Brown, Andrew Isham, Mary Jane Nealon, Victoria Ward

Abstract

Background: Millions of Americans need but don't receive treatment for substance use, and evidence suggests that addiction-focused interventions on smart phones could support their recovery. There is little research on implementation of addiction-related interventions in primary care, particularly in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that provide primary care to underserved populations. We used mixed methods to examine three FQHCs' implementation of Seva, a smart-phone app that offers patients online support/discussion, health-tracking, and tools for coping with cravings, and offers clinicians information about patients' health tracking and relapses. We examined (a) clinicians' initial perspectives about implementing Seva, and (b) the first year of implementation at Site 1.

Methods: Prior to staggered implementation at three FQHCs (Midwest city in WI vs. rural town in MT vs. metropolitan NY), interviews, meetings, and focus groups were conducted with 53 clinicians to identify core themes of initial expectations about implementation. One year into implementation at Site 1, clinicians there were re-interviewed. Their reports were supplemented by quantitative data on clinician and patient use of Seva.

Results: Clinicians anticipated that Seva could help patients and make behavioral health appointments more efficient, but they were skeptical that physicians would engage with Seva (given high caseloads), and they were uncertain whether patients would use Seva. They were concerned about legal obligations for monitoring patients' interactions online, including possible "cries for help" or inappropriate interactions. One year later at Site 1, behavioral health care providers, rather than physicians, had incorporated Seva into patient care, primarily by discussing it during appointments. Given workflow/load concerns, only a few key clinicians monitored health tracking/relapses and prompted outreach when needed; two researchers monitored the discussion board and alerted the clinic as needed. Clinician turnover/leave complicated this approach. Contrary to clinicians' initial concerns, patients showed sustained, mutually supportive use of Seva, with few instances of misuse.

Conclusions: Results suggest the value of (a) focusing implementation on behavioral health care providers rather than physicians, (b) assigning a few individuals (not necessarily clinicians) to monitor health tracking, relapses, and the discussion board, (c) anticipating turnover/leave and having designated replacements. Patients showed sustained, positive use of Seva.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01963234 ).

Keywords: Addiction; Behavioral health care; Primary care; mHealth.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Main menu of Seva on patients’ smartphones
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mockup of clinician report showing hypothetical patient profiles
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Patients’ use of Seva at site 1, reported by patients’ week on study

References

    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2014.
    1. Gorman A. Barriers remain despite health law’s push to expand substance abuse treatment. Washington: Kaiser Health News; 2014.
    1. National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) Principles of drug addiction treatment: a research-based guide. Washington: NIDA; 2012. How do we get more substance-abusing people into treatment?
    1. Rapp RC, Xu J, Carr CA, Lane DT, Wang J, Carlson R. Treatment barriers identified by substance abusers assessed at a centralized intake unit. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30(3):227–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.01.002.
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) A guide to substance abuse services for primary care clinicians. Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. 1997.
    1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Incorporating alcohol pharmacotherapies into medical practice. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment: Rockville; 2009.
    1. Humphreys K, McLellan AT. Brief intervention, treatment, and recovery support services for Americans who have substance use disorders: an overview of policy in the Obama administration. Psychol Serv. 2010;7(4):275. doi: 10.1037/a0020390.
    1. Barry KL, Blow FC, Willenbring ML, McCormick R, Brockmann LM, Visnic S. Use of alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary care settings: implementation and barriers. Subst Abus. 2004;25(1):27–36. doi: 10.1300/J465v25n01_05.
    1. Tracy SW, Trafton JA, Weingardt KR, Aton EG, Humphreys K. How are substance use disorders addressed in VA psychiatric and primary care settings? Results of a national survey. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(2):266–269. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.2.266.
    1. Ferguson L, Ries R, Russo J. Barriers to identification and treatment of hazardous drinkers as assessed by urban/rural primary care doctors. J Addict Dis. 2003;22(2):79–90. doi: 10.1300/J069v22n02_07.
    1. McCormick KA, Cochran NE, Back AL, Merrill JO, Williams EC, Bradley KA. How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(9):966–972. doi: 10.1007/BF02743146.
    1. Robinson P, Reiter J. Behavioral consultation and primary care: a guide to integrating services. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
    1. Quanbeck AR, Gustafson DH, Marsch LA, McTavish F, Brown RT, Mares ML, et al. Integrating addiction treatment into primary care using mobile health technology: protocol for an implementation research study. Implement Sci. 2014;9:65. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-65.
    1. Gustafson DH, Shaw BR, Isham A, Baker T, Boyle MG, Levy M. Explicating an evidence-based, theoretically informed, mobile technology-based system to improve outcomes for people in recovery for alcohol dependence. Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(1):96–111. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.521413.
    1. Marsch LA, Guarino H, Acosta M, Aponte-Melendez Y, Cleland C, Grabinski M, et al. Web-based behavioral treatment for substance use disorders as a partial replacement of standard methadone maintenance treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.08.012.
    1. Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Chih MY, Atwood AK, Johnson RA, Boyle MG, et al. A smartphone application to support recovery from alcoholism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(5):566–572. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4642.
    1. Campbell AN, Nunes EV, Matthews AG, Stitzer M, Miele GM, Polsky D, et al. Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(6):683–690. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13081055.
    1. Chih MY, DuBenske LL, Hawkins RP, Brown RL, Dinauer SK, Cleary JF, et al. Communicating advanced cancer patients’ symptoms via the Internet: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials examining caregiver preparedness, physical burden, and negative mood. Palliat Med. 2013;27(6):533–543. doi: 10.1177/0269216312457213.
    1. Ash JS. Bates DW Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(1):8–12. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1684.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren