A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial

Laura F Salazar, Alana Vivolo-Kantor, James Hardin, Alan Berkowitz, Laura F Salazar, Alana Vivolo-Kantor, James Hardin, Alan Berkowitz

Abstract

Background: Bystander intervention approaches offer promise for reducing rates of sexual violence on college campuses. Most interventions are in-person small-group formats, which limit their reach and reduce their overall public health impact.

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of RealConsent, a Web-based bystander approach to sexual violence prevention, in enhancing prosocial intervening behaviors and preventing sexual violence perpetration.

Methods: A random probability sample of 743 male undergraduate students (aged 18 to 24 years) attending a large, urban university located in the southeastern United States was recruited online and randomized to either RealConsent (n=376) or a Web-based general health promotion program (n=367). Participants were surveyed online at baseline, postintervention, and 6-months postintervention. RealConsent was delivered via a password-protected Web portal that contained six 30-minute media-based and interactive modules covering knowledge of informed consent, communication skills regarding sex, the role of alcohol and male socialization in sexual violence, empathy for rape victims, and bystander education. Primary outcomes were self-reported prosocial intervening behaviors and sexual violence perpetration. Secondary outcomes were theoretical mediators (eg, knowledge, attitudes).

Results: At 6-month follow-up RealConsent participants intervened more often (P=.04) and engaged in less sexual violence perpetration (P=.04) compared to controls. In addition, RealConsent participants reported greater legal knowledge of sexual assault (P<.001), greater knowledge of effective consent (P<.001), less rape myths (P<.001), greater empathy for rape victims (P<.001), less negative date rape attitudes (P<.001), less hostility toward women (P=.01), greater intentions to intervene (P=.04), less hyper-gender ideology (P<.001), less positive outcome expectancies for nonconsensual sex (P=.03), more positive outcome expectancies for intervening (P<.001), and less comfort with other men's inappropriate behaviors (P<.001).

Conclusions: Our results support the efficacy of RealConsent. Due to its Web-based format, RealConsent has potential for broad-based dissemination thereby increasing its overall public health impact on sexual violence.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01903876; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01903876 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6S1PXxWKt).

Keywords: Internet; public health; rape; sex offenses; students; universities.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Laura Salazar was the developer of RealConsent, but she did not derive financial income from the Web-based program. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of RealConsent’s bystander intervention module.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Unadjusted means for sexual violence perpetration across 3 time points for RealConsent and attention-placebo comparison conditions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Unadjusted means for prosocial intervening behavior across 3 time points for RealConsent and attention-placebo comparison conditions.

References

    1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. [2014-08-28]. .
    1. Casey EA, Lindhorst TP. Toward a multi-level, ecological approach to the primary prevention of sexual assault: prevention in peer and community contexts. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2009 Apr;10(2):91–114. doi: 10.1177/1524838009334129.
    1. Amar AF, Gennaro S. Dating violence in college women: associated physical injury, healthcare usage, and mental health symptoms. Nurs Res. 2005;54(4):235–42.
    1. Basile KC, Saltzman LE. Sexual violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Control and Violence Prevention; 2009. [2014-08-28]. .
    1. Abbey A, McAuslan P. A longitudinal examination of male college students' perpetration of sexual assault. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):747–56. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.747.
    1. Fisher BS, Cullen FT, Turner MG. The Sexual Vicitimization of College Women. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; 2000. Dec, [2014-08-28]. .
    1. Forke CM, Myers RK, Catallozzi M, Schwarz DF. Relationship violence among female and male college undergraduate students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jul;162(7):634–41. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.7.634.
    1. Banyard VL. Sexual violence: current perspectives on prevention and intervention. J Prev Interv Community. 2008;36(1-2):1–4. doi: 10.1080/10852350802022225.
    1. Banyard VL, Plante EG, Moynihan MM. Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. J Community Psychol. 2003 Jan;32(1):61–79. doi: 10.1002/jcop.10078.
    1. Ward KJ. Mentors in Violence Prevention: Evaluation 1999/2000. Boston: Northeastern University; 2001. [2014-08-28]. .
    1. Tabachnick J. Engaging bystanders in sexual violence prevention. Enola, PA: National Sexual Violence Resource Center; 2009. [2014-08-28]. .
    1. Foubert JD, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Brasfield H, Hill B. Effects of a rape awareness program on college women: increasing bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene. J Community Psychol. 2010 Aug 03;38(7):813–827. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20397.
    1. Gidycz CA, Orchowski LM, Berkowitz AD. Preventing sexual aggression among college men: an evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):720–42. doi: 10.1177/1077801211409727.
    1. Potter SJ. Using a multimedia social marketing campaign to increase active bystanders on the college campus. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(4):282–95. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.599350.
    1. Potter SJ, Stapleton JG. Bringing in the target audience in bystander social marketing materials for communities: suggestions for practitioners. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):797–812. doi: 10.1177/1077801211410364.
    1. Ahrens CE, Rich MD, Ullman JB. Rehearsing for real life: the impact of the InterACT Sexual Assault Prevention Program on self-reported likelihood of engaging in bystander interventions. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):760–76. doi: 10.1177/1077801211410212.
    1. Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Foubert JD, Brasfield HM, Hill B, Shelley-Tremblay S. The Men's Program: does it impact college men's self-reported bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene? Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):743–59. doi: 10.1177/1077801211409728.
    1. Coker AL, Cook-Craig PG, Williams CM, Fisher BS, Clear ER, Garcia LS, Hegge LM. Evaluation of Green Dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):777–96. doi: 10.1177/1077801211410264.
    1. Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Arnold JS, Eckstein RP, Stapleton JG. Sisterhood may be powerful for reducing sexual and intimate partner violence: an evaluation of the Bringing in the Bystander in-person program with sorority members. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):703–19. doi: 10.1177/1077801211409726.
    1. Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Crossman M. Reducing sexual violence on campus: the role of student leaders as empowered bystanders. Journal of College Student Development. 2009;50(4):446–457. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0083.
    1. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Nov 10;6(4):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40.
    1. Christensen H, Calear AL, Andersson G, Thorndike FP, Tait RJ. Beyond efficacy: the depth and diversity of current internet Interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e92. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2206.
    1. Cassell MM, Jackson C, Cheuvront B. Health communication on the Internet: an effective channel for health behavior change? J Health Commun. 1998;3(1):71–9.
    1. Cugelman B, Thelwall M, Dawes P. Online interventions for social marketing health behavior change campaigns: a meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e17.
    1. Evers KE, Prochaska JM, Prochaska JO, Driskell MM, Cummins CO, Velicer WF. Strengths and weaknesses of health behavior change programs on the internet. J Health Psychol. 2003 Jan;8(1):63–70. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001435.
    1. Muñoz RF. Using evidence-based internet interventions to reduce health disparities worldwide. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(5):e60. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1463.
    1. Christensen H, Leach LS, Barney L, Mackinnon Aj, Griffiths Km. The effect of web based depression interventions on self reported help seeking: randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN77824516] BMC Psychiatry. 2006;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-13.
    1. Kenardy J, McCafferty K, Rosa V. Internet-delivered indicated prevention for anxiety disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Cognit Psychother. 2003;31(3):279–289. doi: 10.1017/S1352465803003047.
    1. Zabinski MF, Pung MA, Wilfley DE, Eppstein DL, Winzelberg AJ, Celio A, Taylor CB. Reducing risk factors for eating disorders: targeting at-risk women with a computerized psychoeducational program. Int J Eat Disord. 2001 May;29(4):401–8.
    1. Maes L, Vereecken CA, Gedrich K, Rieken K, Sichert-Hellert W, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Kersting M, Manios Y, Plada M, Hagströmer M, Dietrich S, Matthys C, HELENA Study Group A feasibility study of using a diet optimization approach in a web-based computer-tailoring intervention for adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008 Nov;32 Suppl 5:S76–81. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.186.
    1. Celio AA, Winzelberg AJ, Wilfley DE, Eppstein-Herald D, Springer EA, Dev P, Taylor CB. Reducing risk factors for eating disorders: comparison of an Internet- and a classroom-delivered psychoeducational program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):650–7.
    1. Riper H, Kramer J, Smit F, Conijn B, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial. Addiction. 2008 Feb;103(2):218–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02063.x.
    1. Kypri K, Saunders JB, Williams SM, McGee RO, Langley JD, Cashell-Smith ML, Gallagher SJ. Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2004 Nov;99(11):1410–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00847.x.
    1. Bewick BM, Trusler K, Mulhern B, Barkham M, Hill AJ. The feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based personalised feedback and social norms alcohol intervention in UK university students: a randomised control trial. Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;33(9):1192–8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.05.002.
    1. Postel MG, de Haan HA, ter Huurne ED, Becker ES, de Jong CA. Effectiveness of a web-based intervention for problem drinkers and reasons for dropout: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(4):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1642.
    1. Riper H, Spek V, Boon B, Conijn B, Kramer J, Martin-Abello K, Smit F. Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1691.
    1. Lenert L, Muñoz RF, Stoddard J, Delucchi K, Bansod A, Skoczen S, Pérez-Stable EJ. Design and pilot evaluation of an internet smoking cessation program. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):16–20.
    1. Danielson CK, McCauley JL, Jones AM, Borkman AL, Miller S, Ruggiero KJ. Feasibility of delivering evidence-based HIV/STI prevention programming to a community sample of African American teen girls via the internet. AIDS Educ Prev. 2013 Oct;25(5):394–404. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2013.25.5.394.
    1. Mouthaan J, Sijbrandij M, de Vries GJ, Reitsma JB, van de Schoot R, Goslings JC, Luitse JS, Bakker FC, Gersons BP, Olff M. Internet-based early intervention to prevent posttraumatic stress disorder in injury patients: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e165. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2460.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143–64. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660.
    1. Fabiano PM, Perkins HW, Berkowitz A, Linkenbach J, Stark C. Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: evidence for a social norms approach. J Am Coll Health. 2003;52(3):105–12. doi: 10.1080/07448480309595732.
    1. Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Plante EG. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. J Community Psychol. 2007 May;35(4):463–481. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20159.
    1. The ISA Group. [2014-08-22].
    1. Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn't matter. J Pers Assess. 2003 Jun;80(3):217–22. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_01.
    1. Hennessy M, Bleakley A, Fishbein M. Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2012 Mar;640(1):42–57. doi: 10.1177/0002716211424709.
    1. Kilmartin C, Conway A, Friedberg A. Social conformity and sexism in all-male peer groups. Virginia Psychological Association Spring Convention; Virginia Psychological Association Spring Convention; Apr 1999; Virginia Beach, VA. 1999.
    1. Loh C, Gidycz CA, Lobo TR, Luthra R. A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. J Interpers Violence. 2005 Oct;20(10):1325–48. doi: 10.1177/0886260505278528.
    1. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues. 1996 May 01;17(3):283–316. doi: 10.1177/019251396017003001.
    1. Maxwell CD, Robinson AL, Post LA. The nature and predictors of sexual victimization and offending among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2003;32:465–77. doi: 10.1023/A:1025942503285.
    1. Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF. Rape myth acceptance: exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality. 1999 Mar;33(1):27–68. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.
    1. Hamburger ME, Hogben M, McGowan S, Dawson LJ. Assessing hypergender ideologies: development and initial validation of a gender-neutral measure of adherence to extreme gender-role beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality. 1996 Jun;30(2):157–178. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1996.0011.
    1. Deitz SR, Blackwell KT, Daley PC, Bentley BJ. Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982 Aug;43(2):372–84.
    1. Check JVP. The Hostility Toward Women Scale [dissertation] Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba; 1985.
    1. Burgess GH. Assessment of rape-supportive attitudes and beliefs in college men: development, reliability, and validity of the rape attitudes and beliefs scale. J Interpers Violence. 2007 Aug;22(8):973–93. doi: 10.1177/0886260507302993.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Piantadosi S. Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
    1. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1993.
    1. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
    1. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logisitic Regression. New York: John Wiley & sons; 1989.
    1. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co; 1998.
    1. Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. 2013. [2014-08-28]. .
    1. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized Estimating Equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2003.
    1. Liang K, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13–22. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13.
    1. Efron B. Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika. 1981;68:589–99.
    1. Vladutiu CJ, Martin SL, Macy RJ. College- or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: a review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011 Apr;12(2):67–86. doi: 10.1177/1524838010390708.
    1. Garrity SE. Sexual assault prevention programs for college-aged men: a critical evaluation. J Forensic Nurs. 2011 Mar;7(1):40–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01094.x.
    1. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
    1. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379–87. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379.
    1. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In: Bryant J, Zillmann D, editors. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994. pp. 61–90.
    1. Resnicow K, Baranowski T, Ahluwalia JS, Braithwaite RL. Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified. Ethn Dis. 1999;9(1):10–21.
    1. DeGue S, Holt MK, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL, Tharp AT, Valle LA. Looking ahead toward community-level strategies to prevent sexual violence. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012 Jan;21(1):1–3. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3263.
    1. Peels DA, Bolman C, Golsteijn RH, De Vries H, Mudde AN, van Stralen MM, Lechner L. Differences in reach and attrition between Web-based and print-delivered tailored interventions among adults over 50 years of age: clustered randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e179. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2229.
    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren