Explaining the effects of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses: a process evaluation alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial

Anita Huis, Gerda Holleman, Theo van Achterberg, Richard Grol, Lisette Schoonhoven, Marlies Hulscher, Anita Huis, Gerda Holleman, Theo van Achterberg, Richard Grol, Lisette Schoonhoven, Marlies Hulscher

Abstract

Background: There is only limited understanding of why hand hygiene improvement strategies are successful or fail. It is therefore important to look inside the 'black box' of such strategies, to ascertain which components of a strategy work well or less well. This study examined which components of two hand hygiene improvement strategies were associated with increased nurses' hand hygiene compliance.

Methods: A process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in which part of the nursing wards of three hospitals in the Netherlands received a state-of-the-art strategy, including education, reminders, feedback, and optimising materials and facilities; another part received a team and leaders-directed strategy that included all elements of the state-of-the-art strategy, supplemented with activities aimed at the social and enhancing leadership. This process evaluation used four sets of measures: effects on nurses' hand hygiene compliance, adherence to the improvement strategies, contextual factors, and nurses' experiences with strategy components. Analyses of variance and multiple regression analyses were used to explore changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance and thereby better understand trial effects.

Results: Both strategies were performed with good adherence to protocol. Two contextual factors were associated with changes in hand hygiene compliance: a hospital effect in long term (p < 0.05), and high hand hygiene baseline scores were associated with smaller effects (p < 0.01). In short term, changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance were positively correlated with experienced feedback about their hand hygiene performance (p < 0.05). In the long run, several items of the components 'social influence' (i.e., addressing each other on undesirable hand hygiene behaviour p < 0.01), and 'leadership' (i.e., ward manager holds team members accountable for hand hygiene performance p < 0.01) correlated positively with changes in nurses' hand hygiene compliance.

Conclusion: This study illustrates the use of a process evaluation to uncover mechanisms underlying change in hand hygiene improvement strategies. Our study results demonstrate the added value of specific aspects of social influence and leadership in hand hygiene improvement strategies, thus offering an interpretation of the trial effects.

Trial registration: The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, dossier number: NCT00548015.

References

    1. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:iii–72.
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care First Global Patient Safety Challenge. Clean Care is Safer Care; 2009. .
    1. Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Altman DG, Bastian H, Boutron I, Brice A. Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ. 2010;341:c3852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3852.
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332:413–416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
    1. Strange V, Allen E, Oakley A, Bonell C, Johnson A, Stephenson J. Integrating process with outcome data in a randomised controlled trial of sex education. Evaluation. 2006;12:330–352. doi: 10.1177/1356389006069138.
    1. Campbell MC, Elbourne D, Altman D. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2004;328:702–708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.
    1. Mihalic SF, Fagan AA, Argamaso S. Implementing the LifeSkills Training drug prevention program: factors related to implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2008;3:5. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-5.
    1. Grol R, Wensing M, In Improving patient care. Effective implementation: A model. London: Elsevier: Edited by Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M; 2005. pp. 41–57.
    1. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:237–256. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.237.
    1. Hulscher ME, Laurant MG, Grol RP. Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:40–46. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.40.
    1. Rossi P, Freeman H, Lipsey M. Evaluation. A systematic approach., seventh edition edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2003.
    1. Linnan L, Steckler A, In Process Evaluation in Public Health Interventions and Research. Process evaluation and public health interventions: An overview. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers: Edited by Steckler A, Linnan L; 2002. pp. 1–23.
    1. Bonell C, Hargreaves J, Strange V, Pronyk P, Porter J. Should structural interventions be evaluated using RCTs? The case of HIV prevention. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:1135–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.026.
    1. Hasson H. Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implement Sci. 2010;5:67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-67.
    1. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme. Lancet. 2000;356:1307–1312.
    1. Allegranzi B, Pittet D. Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2009;73:305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.019.
    1. Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection Control Program. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:126–130.
    1. Gould DJ, Moralejo D, Drey N, Chudleigh JH. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD005186
    1. Naikoba S, Hayward A. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing handwashing in healthcare workers - a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2001;47:173–180. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0882.
    1. van Achterberg T. Schoonhoven L, Grol R: Nursing implementation science: how evidence-based nursing requires evidence-based implementation. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40:302–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00243.x.
    1. Jumaa PA. Hand hygiene: simple and complex. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005;9:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.05.005.
    1. Pittet D. The Lowbury lecture: behaviour in infection control. J Hosp Infect. 2004;58:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.06.002.
    1. Huis A, Schoonhoven L, Grol R, Donders R, Hulscher M, Van AT. Impact of a team and leaders-directed strategy to improve nurses' adherence to hand hygiene guidelines: A cluster randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012.
    1. Huis A, Schoonhoven L, Grol R, Borm G, Adang E, Hulscher M. Helping hands: A cluster randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of two different strategies for promoting hand hygiene in hospital nurses. Implement Sci. 2011;6:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-101.
    1. Bandura A. Social foundation and thought of action: a social cognitive theory. New York: Prentice Hall; 1986.
    1. Mittman BS, Tonesk X, Jacobson PD. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:413–422.
    1. Shortell SM, Marsteller JA, Lin M, Pearson ML, Wu SY, Mendel P. The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care. Med Care. 2004;42:1040–1048. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200411000-00002.
    1. West MA, In Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. The social psychology of innovation in groups. John Wiley and Sons: Edited by West MA&FJl. Chichester; 1990. pp. 309–333.
    1. OVretveit J. The Leaders' Role in Quality and Safety Improvement; a review of Re-search and Guidance; the "Improving Improvement Action Evaluation Project. Association of County Councils (Lanstingsforbundet): Stockholm; 2004.
    1. Werkgroep Infectiepreventie. Handhygiëne medewerkers ziekenhuizen. 2007. .
    1. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.
    1. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:119–127. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.2.119.
    1. Larson EL, Bryan JL, Adler LM, Blane C. A multifaceted approach to changing handwashing behavior. Am J Infect Control. 1997;25:3–10. doi: 10.1016/S0196-6553(97)90046-8.
    1. McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Seers K. Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of 'context'. J Adv Nurs. 2002;38:94–104. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02150.x.
    1. Wagner GJ, Kanouse DE. Assessing usual care in clinical trials of adherence interventions for highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33:276–277. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200306010-00026.
    1. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. Linking theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: Edited by Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK; 1997. pp. 19–35.
    1. Bond GR, Evans L, Salyers MP, Williams J, Kim HW. Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Ment Health Serv Res. 2000;2:75–87. doi: 10.1023/A:1010153020697.
    1. Pocock SJ, Abdalla M. The hope and the hazards of using compliance data in randomized controlled trials. Stat Med. 1998;17:303–317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980215)17:3<303::AID-SIM764>;2-0.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors en medewerkers

Medische omstandigheden

Geneesmiddelinterventies

3
Abonneren