A pharmacogenomic approach to the treatment of children with GH deficiency or Turner syndrome

P Clayton, P Chatelain, L Tatò, H W Yoo, G R Ambler, A Belgorosky, S Quinteiro, C Deal, A Stevens, J Raelson, P Croteau, B Destenaves, C Olivier, P Clayton, P Chatelain, L Tatò, H W Yoo, G R Ambler, A Belgorosky, S Quinteiro, C Deal, A Stevens, J Raelson, P Croteau, B Destenaves, C Olivier

Abstract

Objective: Individual sensitivity to recombinant human GH (r-hGH) is variable. Identification of genetic factors contributing to this variability has potential use for individualization of treatment. The objective of this study was to identify genetic markers and gene expression profiles associated with growth response on r-hGH therapy in treatment-naïve, prepubertal children with GH deficiency (GHD) or Turner syndrome (TS).

Design: A prospective, multicenter, international, open-label pharmacogenomic study.

Methods: The associations of genotypes in 103 growth- and metabolism-related genes and baseline gene expression profiles with growth response to r-hGH (cm/year) over the first year were evaluated. Genotype associations were assessed with growth response as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable divided into quartiles.

Results: Eleven genes in GHD and ten in TS, with two overlapping between conditions, were significantly associated with growth response either as a continuous variable (seven in GHD, two in TS) or as a categorical variable (four more in GHD, eight more in TS). For example, in GHD, GRB10 was associated with high response (≥ Q3; P=0.0012), while SOS2 was associated with low response (≤ Q1; P=0.006), while in TS, LHX4 was associated with high response (P=0.0003) and PTPN1 with low response (P=0.0037). Differences in expression were identified for one of the growth response-associated genes in GHD (AKT1) and for two in TS (KRAS and MYOD1).

Conclusions: Carriage of specific growth-related genetic markers is associated with growth response in GHD and TS. These findings indicate that pharmacogenomics could have a role in individualized management of childhood growth disorders.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00699855.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A and C) The first and second principal components (PCs), based on a PC analysis undertaken on Tag single nucleotide polymorphisms for children with (A) GH deficiency (GHD) and (C) Turner syndrome (TS). The first PC clearly demarcates children from Asian countries vs children from all other countries. (B and D) The relationship between first-year growth response and the first PC in children with (B) GHD and (D) TS. There is complete overlap in growth response between children from Asian countries vs children from all other countries. The same overlap occurs with the second PC (data not shown). Countries are Argentina, Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan and UK.
Figure 2
Figure 2
‘Heat map’ of genes associated with first-year growth response to r-hGH in (A) children with GH deficiency (GHD) and (B) girls with Turner syndrome (TS). Each column (x-axis) represents an individual child (with growth rate (cm) shown), and each row (y-axis) represents an individual gene. Red color in a cell indicates increased gene expression and green color in a cell represents decreased gene expression in the lowest quartile vs the rest. The box indicates the expression profiles of those in the lowest quartile. The ‘dendrogram’, which groups ‘clusters’ of genes with similar expression levels, is shown on the left side of each figure. Low Q, lowest quartile (≤Q1).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Biologic networks inferred from genes associated with growth response in children with (A) GH deficiency (GHD) and (B) Turner syndrome (TS). Blue shading indicates genes found to be associated with growth response in this study; orange shading indicates genes within the network associated with differences in baseline expression; orange/blue shading represents putative eQTLs, where there is both a genetic association and a change in gene expression; white shading represents genes in the inferred network, which have not been directly associated with growth response or gene expression difference. The tables show gene expression differences when comparing low growth response (quartile, Q1 vs Q2–Q4) and high growth response (quartile, Q4 vs Q1–Q3); green cells of the table represent downregulated gene expression; red cells of the table represent upregulated gene expression and gray cells of the table represent no change in gene expression.

References

    1. Ho KK. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with GH deficiency II: a statement of the GH Research Society in association with the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Lawson Wilkins Society, European Society of Endocrinology, Japan Endocrine Society, and Endocrine Society of Australia. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2007;157:695–700. doi: 10.1530/EJE-07-0631.
    1. Richmond E, Rogol AD. Current indications for growth hormone therapy for children and adolescents. Endocrine Development. 2010;18:92–108.
    1. Lee JM, Davis MM, Clark SJ, Hofer TP, Kemper AR. Estimated cost-effectiveness of growth hormone therapy for idiopathic short stature. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2006;160:263–269. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.3.263.
    1. Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Rindress D, Gregoire JP, Deal C. Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2010;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-8-4.
    1. NICE. Human growth hormone (somatropin) for the treatment of growth failure in children (review) (Technology appraisals, TA188) – Issued May 2010 (available at: , last accessed: 21 December 2012), 2010.
    1. Lango AH, Estrada K, Lettre G, Berndt SI, Weedon MN, Rivadeneira F, Willer CJ, Jackson AU, Vedantam S, Raychaudhuri S, et al. Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature. 2010;467:832–838. doi: 10.1038/nature09410.
    1. Lanktree MB, Guo Y, Murtaza M, Glessner JT, Bailey SD, Onland-Moret NC, Lettre G, Ongen H, Rajagopalan R, Johnson T, et al. Meta-analysis of dense genecentric association studies reveals common and uncommon variants associated with height. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2011;88:6–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.007.
    1. Dos Santos C, Essioux L, Teinturier C, Tauber M, Goffin V, Bougneres P. A common polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor is associated with increased responsiveness to growth hormone. Nature Genetics. 2004;36:720–724. doi: 10.1038/ng1379.
    1. Renehan AG, Solomon M, Zwahlen M, Morjaria R, Whatmore A, Audi L, Binder G, Blum W, Bougneres P, Santos CD, et al. Growth hormone receptor polymorphism and growth hormone therapy response in children: a Bayesian meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;175:867–877. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr408.
    1. Wassenaar MJ, Dekkers OM, Pereira AM, Wit JM, Smit JW, Biermasz NR, Romijn JA. Impact of the exon 3-deleted growth hormone (GH) receptor polymorphism on baseline height and the growth response to recombinant human GH therapy in GH-deficient (GHD) and non-GHD children with short stature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2009;94:3721–3730. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0425.
    1. Mitchell CJ, Nelson AE, Cowley MJ, Kaplan W, Stone G, Sutton SK, Lau A, Lee CM, Ho KK. Detection of growth hormone doping by gene expression profiling of peripheral blood. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2009;94:4703–4709. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1038.
    1. Whatmore AJ, Patel L, Clayton PE. A pilot study to evaluate gene expression profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from children with GH deficiency and Turner syndrome in response to GH treatment. Clinical Endocrinology. 2009;70:429–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03477.x.
    1. van't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415:530–536. doi: 10.1038/415530a.
    1. van de Vijver M, He YD, van't Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347:1999–2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967.
    1. Wang L, McLeod HL, Weinshilboum RM. Genomics and drug response. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;364:1144–1153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1001885.
    1. Sempé M, Pédron G & Roy-Pernot MP. In Auxologie, Méthode et Séquences. Paris: Theraplix, 1979.
    1. Elmlinger MW, Kuhnel W, Weber MM, Ranke MB. Reference ranges for two automated chemiluminescent assays for serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2004;42:654–664. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.112.
    1. Stevens A, Hanson D, Whatmore A, Destenaves B, Chatelain P, Clayton P. Network analysis of gene expression in different tissues through childhood highlights changes related to both age and growth. Hormone Research in Paediatrics. 2012;78(S1):33.
    1. The ENCODE Project Consortium. A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE) PLoS Biology. 2011;9:e1001046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001046.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, Price DA. Derivation and validation of a mathematical model for predicting the response to exogenous recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in prepubertal children with idiopathic GH deficiency. KIGS International Board. Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1999;84:1174–1183. doi: 10.1210/jc.84.4.1174.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, Price DA. Predicting the response to recombinant human growth hormone in Turner syndrome: KIGS models. KIGS International Board. Kabi International Growth Study. Acta Paediatrica. Supplement. 1999;88:122–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb14420.x.
    1. Ranke MB, Lindberg A. Observed and predicted growth responses in prepubertal children with growth disorders: guidance of growth hormone treatment by empirical variables. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2010;95:1229–1237. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1471.
    1. De Ridder MA, Stijnen T, Hokken-Koelega AC. Prediction model for adult height of small for gestational age children at the start of growth hormone treatment. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008;93:477–483. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1381.
    1. Schonau E, Westermann F, Rauch F, Stabrey A, Wassmer G, Keller E, Bramswig J, Blum WF. A new and accurate prediction model for growth response to growth hormone treatment in children with growth hormone deficiency. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2001;144:13–20. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1440013.
    1. Jogie-Brahim S, Feldman D, Oh Y. Unraveling insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 actions in human disease. Endocrine Reviews. 2009;30:417–437. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0028.
    1. Cheng I, DeLellis HK, Haiman CA, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Freedman ML, Le ML. Genetic determinants of circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein (BP)-1, and IGFBP-3 levels in a multiethnic population. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007;92:3660–3666. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0790.
    1. Das U, Whatmore AJ, Khosravi J, Wales JK, Butler G, Kibirige MS, Diamandi A, Jones J, Patel L, Hall CM, et al. IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 measurements on filter paper blood spots in children and adolescents on GH treatment: use in monitoring and as markers of growth performance. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2003;149:179–185. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1490179.
    1. Costalonga EF, Antonini SR, Guerra G, Jr, Coletta RR, Franca MM, Braz AF, Mendonca BB, Arnhold IJ, Jorge AA. Growth hormone pharmacogenetics: the interactive effect of a microsatellite in the IGF1 promoter region with the GHR-exon 3 and −202 A/C IGFBP3 variants on treatment outcomes of children with severe GH deficiency. Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2012;12:439–445. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.13.
    1. Westwood M, Tajbakhsh SH, Siddals KW, Whatmore AJ, Clayton PE. Reduced pericellular sensitivity to IGF-I in fibroblasts from girls with Turner syndrome: a mechanism to impair clinical responses to GH. Pediatric Research. 2011;70:25–30. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31821b570b.
    1. Koh WP, Yuan JM, Wang R, Govindarajan S, Oppenheimer R, Zhang ZQ, Yu MC, Ingles SA. Aromatase (CYP19) promoter gene polymorphism and risk of nonviral hepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:3383–3392. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25939.
    1. Tartaglia M, Gelb BD, Zenker M. Noonan syndrome and clinically related disorders. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2011;25:161–179. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.09.002.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonneren